Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004862
Original file (20130004862.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  17 December 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130004862 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his rank/grade as captain (CPT)/O-3 vice first lieutenant (1LT)/O-2.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he was due to be promoted to CPT on his four year anniversary, 2 November 1998.  His name was on the CPT promotion list and he should have been promoted.  He was honorably discharged for a disability with severance pay on 16 November 1998, 14 days after his date of rank (DOR) for CPT.  

3.  The applicant provides:

* A supplemental information sheet
* Congratulatory letter, dated 29 September 1998
* DD Form 214 
* A letter from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), dated 13 February 2013

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was appointed as a Reserve commissioned officer on 
12 August 1994 and entered active duty on 2 November 1994.  He served in area of concentration 91A (Ordnance General) and 11A (Infantry).

3.  Order Number 320-049, issued by the U.S. Total Army Personnel Command (now the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC)), on 16 November 1998.  These orders:

* show he was scheduled to be promoted to CPT with an effective date and DOR of 1 December 1998
* state that the promotion is not valid and will be revoked if the officer concerned is not in a promotable status on the effective date of the promotion

4.  He was honorably discharged from active duty on 16 November 1998.  His DD Form 214 shows at the time of his discharge he was serving in the grade of 1LT with the DOR of 2 November 1996 and he was discharged by reason of disability, severance pay.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-29 (Officer Promotions), paragraph 1-12 (Promotion Lists) in effect at the time, states an officer who is on a promotion list and is removed from the active duty list (ADL) prior to the effective date of promotion shall not be promoted from the ADL promotion list.  A subsequent return to the ADL does not warrant a return to promotion list status held prior to release from active duty.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he should have been promoted to CPT prior to his discharge because he was on the promotion list and he was due to be promoted to CPT on his four year anniversary, on 2 November 1998.  

2.  However, the evidence shows he was scheduled to be promoted with the effective date and DOR of 1 December 1998, after he was discharged.

3.  Army regulations in effect at the time and the orders that would have promoted him to CPT specifically state that an officer who is on a promotion list and is removed from the ADL prior to the effective date of promotion shall not be promoted from the ADL promotion list.  Additionally, any promotion orders previously issued will be considered invalid and revoked if the officer concerned is not in a promotable status on the effective date of the promotion.

4.  The evidence of record shows he was discharged and, therefore, removed from the ADL prior to the effective date of his promotion.  As such, he was not eligible for promotion to CPT because he held no military status on the date the promotion orders became effective.  Additionally, at the time of his discharge there was no regulatory or statutory provision for promoting officers who were discharged due to a medical disability.

5.  Based on the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting his requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   x_______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130004862





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130004862



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060016197

    Original file (20060016197.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This order shows, in pertinent part, that the applicant was promoted to the grade of rank of CPT, effective and with a DOR of 1 March 2005. The applicant adds, in effect, that the Reserve Support Command should be able to confirm another person was assigned as the MP Platoon Leader and that he was assigned as the Operations Officer (i.e., a captain's position) from 16 July 2001 through 9 February 2003. Chief, Office of Promotions, RC, USA HRC, St. Louis, Missouri, effect necessary action...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006276

    Original file (20110006276.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was promoted to the rank of 1LT on 5 November 1992. In a rebuttal to the advisory opinion, dated 18 November 2011, he stated it is obvious he was passed over for promotion to CPT due to his time in the IRR. The evidence of record shows that due to an administrative error on the part of the Army the applicant was erroneously promoted to the rank of CPT on 4 December 2000.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016040

    Original file (20140016040.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * a 12-page list titled "2012 CPT AMEDD (Army Medical Department) Promotion Selection Board Results by Competitive Category" * her CPT promotion order * two copies of her 1LT promotion order CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. If she had not been in the USAR, she would have attended the active duty BOLC prior to starting USAGPAN when she entered active duty on 25 May 2012, and therefore would have been board eligible for the FY13 CPT AMEDD ADL PSB. Enclosure 3, 4(c)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015111

    Original file (20130015111.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF BOARD DATE: 10 June 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130015111 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his date of rank (DOR) to captain (CPT) in the Texas Army National Guard (TXARNG) from 28 March 2013 to 1 September 2010. Having had prior enlisted service, the applicant was appointed as a Regular Army Medical Services (MS) officer and executed an Oath of Office on 2 August 2007.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017564

    Original file (20110017564.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The entry grade and DOR or promotion service credit in grade of a commissioned officer shall be determined by the entry-grade credit awarded upon appointment. Synthesizing the requirements of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 533, and DODI 1312.03 in determining his entry grade upon his original appointment in the RA on 30 August 2010, PP&TO and HRC were required to calculate and award the sum of his commissioned service in an active status and his CSC for law school. The evidence of record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020576

    Original file (20110020576.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was granted the appropriate amount of constructive credit upon entry in the U.S. Army, adjustment of the effective dates and dates of rank (DOR) for his subsequent promotions, and payment of all back pay due as a result of the corrections. Headquarters, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, Orders 149-02, dated 29 May 2007, that reassigned the applicant from the USUHS Student Detachment, Bethesda, MD, to the USA Center...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010732

    Original file (20130010732.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    HRC, Officer Promotions Branch has stated that the applicant's separation on 22 July 2012 was after the approval date of her respective board and there was no proof she was in a non-promotable status on the effective date of her separation; therefore, the active duty promotion orders should stand and her DD Form 214 should be corrected to show her rank as CPT. Based on this correction, Orders Number C-02-302825, dated 15 February 2013, issued by HRC, should be amended to list her rank as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001416

    Original file (20080001416.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pay information received via electronic mail (email) from the Defense Military Pay Office, Fort McCoy, Wisconsin provides that, in accordance with the Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation, Volume 7, Chapter 1, certain USAR officers credited with 1,460 retirement points for enlisted service were entitled to a special, increased rate of basic pay for pay grades O-1E, O-2E, and O-3E. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002072743C070403

    Original file (2002072743C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20 August 1997, the OKARNG issued a NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) honorably discharging the applicant from the OKARNG as a SGT, pay grade E-5, by reason of the individual's request. The investigation further substantiated that: the applicant submitted false information on his application for Army National Guard federal recognition in January 1987 by stating “No” to the question, “Have you ever been arrested or convicted by a civil court of other than minor...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100018890

    Original file (20100018890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    An officer who does not complete the USUHS program is added to the Active Duty List (ADL) as a 2LT with a DOR of the date of disenrollment unless they have prior creditable commissioned service time before they entered the USUHS program. Accordingly, he should have been promoted to 1LT on 10 December 2008, the date he was academically disenrolled from the USUHS, and promoted to CPT effective 10 July 2010. The evidence of record shows he entered active duty as a student on 26 May 2007.