Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004739
Original file (20130004739.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  22 October 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130004739 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.  

2.  The applicant states he informed his commander that he was having surgery. He contends that his commander failed to act in his behalf and did not submit a request for the Purple Heart knowing he was being medically evacuated out of Vietnam.  He continues that he was flown to Japan for surgery to remove a residual lymphoma in the left lower quadrant of the abdomen but it was never looked into or followed up, resulting in no action but labeled as just a scar.  

3.  The applicant provides a DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United Sates Report of Transfer or Discharge), and a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Corporate Award and Rating Data.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army on 19 September 1967.  He was awarded military occupational specialty 13F (Cannoneer) upon completion of initial entry training.  

3.  Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in Vietnam from 26 February 1968 to 28 January 1969.  Item 
38 (Record of Assignments) shows he was in a patient status, assigned to the 7th Field Hospital, APO 96344 (Japan) from 25 January 1969 to 25 March 1969. Item 40 (Wounds) is blank and item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not show the Purple Heart.

4.  There is no evidence of record that indicates he was recommended for or awarded the Purple Heart or that he was treated for a combat-related wound.

5.  He was honorably released from active duty on 18 September 1969.

6.  Review of The Adjutant General's Office, Casualty Division's Vietnam casualty listing does not show the applicant's name as a casualty.

7.  Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command Military Awards Branch, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to the applicant.

8.  He provides a VA Corporate Award and Rating Data that suggests he was granted service connected disability compensation for a number of medical conditions including a scar, left lower quadrant of the abdomen.  This document does not show he was wounded as a result of hostile actions.  

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that he should be awarded the Purple Heart has been carefully considered.

2.  His DA Form 20 contains no entries indicating he was wounded in action and there is no evidence in his military record that indicates he was treated for a combat-related wound.  His name is not listed on the Vietnam casualty listing.

3.  Evidence shows he was medically evacuated to Japan.  However, there is no evidence showing he was evacuated due to wounds received as a result of hostile actions.  

4.  The governing regulation requires that substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the injury was the result of hostile action and that the injury required treatment by medical personnel.  In the absence of such corroborating evidence, the documents provided are insufficient evidence for award of the Purple Heart.  

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_X__  __X______  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130004739



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130004739



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011917

    Original file (20080011917.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, there is no evidence of record which verifies his injuries were a result of hostile action in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding the Purple Heart for wounds sustained in July 1969 and showing this award on his DD Form 214. ______________________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011928

    Original file (20070011928.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that two additional awards of the Purple Heart be included on his Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214). United States Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided, in pertinent part, for award of the Purple Heart. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show that he was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017092

    Original file (20080017092.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 25 (Selected Administrative Data) of this form shows the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart by 12th Evacuation Hospital, General Order 234, dated 6 October 1968. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected to show...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014367

    Original file (20080014367.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He states he was wounded a third time on 10 August 1970. Orders from the 12th Evacuation Hospital, the entry in Item 40 of the applicant's DA Form 20, and the Vietnam Casualty Listing all show the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action on 10 August 1970. In the absence of military records which show that the applicant was wounded or treated for wounds resulting from hostile action more than once, there is insufficient evidence upon which to base a second award of the Purple...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003440

    Original file (20140003440.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the award. A review of the applicant's military personnel record failed to reveal any orders or other evidence that shows he was awarded the Purple Heart. His available military service records do not show any evidence that he was wounded or injured in action as a result of a hostile act of the enemy.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017607

    Original file (20110017607.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. The Purple Heart requires: * a wound was the result of hostile action * treatment of the wound by military medical personnel * documentation of the wound in official records * official orders awarding the decoration 4. Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence to support award of the Purple Heart in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017314

    Original file (20100017314.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 also states the Purple Heart was awarded for an injury or wound sustained as a result of hostile action. The evidence of record also shows he had "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings during his service in the Army, he attained the rank and pay grade of sergeant/E-5, served in Vietnam, and was wounded in action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100009363

    Original file (20100009363.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military records show that he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 3 December 1968. Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017185

    Original file (20080017185.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge (DD Form 214) to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal; however, it does not show the three bronze service stars to which he is entitled for his campaign participation. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004859

    Original file (20090004859.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 provides that during the Vietnam era the Combat Infantryman Badge was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. To be awarded the Purple Heart, substantiating evidence must be presented to show that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of...