BOARD DATE: 29 October 2013
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130004498
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show this award.
2. The applicant states he served honorably and with no disciplinary infractions for over 1 year during a time of war (Vietnam); therefore, he is eligible for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.
3. The applicant provides a letter and his DD Form 214.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 2 April 1969. He held military occupational specialty 71B (Clerk Typist) and attained the rank/grade of specialist four/E-4.
3. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows:
a. He served in Vietnam from 16 January 1970 to on or about 4 December 1970. He was assigned to the 8th Military Police Group (Criminal Investigations) from 21 January 1970 to 4 December 1970.
b. He was awarded or authorized the:
* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
* two overseas service bars
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16)
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14)
4. He was honorably released from active duty on 8 December 1970 as an overseas returnee. His DD Form 214 shows he served in Vietnam from 16 January 1970 to 7 December 1970 and he was awarded or authorized the:
* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)
* two overseas service bars
* Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16)
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14)
5. A review of his service records shows no derogatory information in the form of lost time, nonjudicial punishment, or suspension of favorable personnel actions that would disqualify him for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal during the period 2 April 1969 through 8 December 1970. With the exception of one service school efficiency rating of "good" based on academic proficiency, he received consistently "excellent" ratings for his conduct and efficiency. There are also no entries in his record to indicate that his commanders denied him award of the Army Good Conduct Medal during this period of service.
6. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings. Ratings of "unknown" for portions of the period under consideration were not disqualifying. Service school efficiency ratings based upon academic proficiency of at least "good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 were not disqualifying. There must have been no convictions by a court-martial. However, there was no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander made a positive recommendation for its award and until the awarding authority announced the award in general orders.
7. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the regulatory guidance for award of Vietnam Service Medal. A bronze service star is authorized with this award for each Vietnam campaign a member is credited with participating in. Appendix B shows during his service in Vietnam, participation credit was awarded for the following three campaigns:
* Vietnam Winter-Spring 1970 (1 November 1969-30 April 1970)
* Sanctuary Counteroffensive (1 May-30 June 1970)
* Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VII (1 July 1970-30 June 1971)
8. Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, dated 1974, awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to Headquarters, U.S. Military Assistance Command, and its subordinate units during the period 8 February 1962 to 28 March 1973 and to Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam, and its subordinate units during the period 20 July 1965 to 28 March 1973.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to add this badge.
2. The evidence of record shows he participated in three campaigns while serving in Vietnam. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show three bronze service stars to be affixed to his previously-awarded Vietnam Service Medal.
3. General orders awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to all U.S. Army units serving in Vietnam. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this unit award.
4. He served honorably during the period 2 April 1969 through 8 December 1970. His records do not contain any derogatory information in the form of lost time, nonjudicial punishment, or suspension of favorable personnel actions that would disqualify him for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. There are no entries in his record to indicate that his commander denied him this award and with the exception of one service school efficiency rating of "good" based on academic proficiency, he received consistently "excellent" ratings for his conduct and efficiency. Therefore, he should be awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) and his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.
BOARD VOTE:
___X__ ___X_____ ___X_____ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 2 April 1969 through 8 December 1970;
b. adding the following awards to his DD Form 214:
* Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation
* Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Grenade Bar
* three bronze service stars for wear on his previously-awarded Vietnam Service Medal
___________X______________
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130004498
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130004498
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009472
The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Air Medal, the Army Commendation Medal, the Good Conduct Medal, and the Presidential Unit Citation. There are no General Orders in the applicant's records that show he was awarded the Good Conduct Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for exemplary behavior, efficiency, and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019795
Item 24 of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. General orders awarded the applicants unit of assignment the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation which is not shown on his records; therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show this award. The evidence of record also shows that the applicant participated in four campaigns during his service in the Republic of Vietnam, two of which are not shown on his records;...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100013348
However, there is no evidence in the available record, nor has he provided any evidence, showing he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal and three Presidential Unit Citations. The applicant is authorized the following awards that should be added to his DD Form 214: * Valorous Unit Award * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation * Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle, Machine Gun, and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011295
Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to show that he is entitled to award of the Purple Heart and correction of his records to show this award. Record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds sustained in the Republic of Vietnam on 27 May 1970, awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 22 July 1969...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004268
Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time of the applicant's separation, provides that the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. Based on this excellent record of service, he is eligible for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 11 September 1969 through 15 April 1971 and to have it added to his DD Form 214. As a result,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015026
The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Army Good Conduct Medal, Vietnam Service Medal with two or three bronze service stars, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and any other awards and decorations he is authorized based on his military service. The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show the Army Good Conduct Medal, Vietnam Service Medal with two or three bronze service...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003085597C070212
The applicant's DD Form 214 shows the Vietnam Service Medal as an authorized award. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows the Vietnam Service Medal as an authorized award. Therefore, the applicant's DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080001853
Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who had completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period from 9 December 1968 to 8 December 1970; b. deleting the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars and replacing it with...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070013154
Lacking any derogatory information on file that would have disqualified him, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service. Evidence of record shows that the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026408
The applicant's record shows he was wounded in action on 12 April 1969 and received treatment that is a matter of official record. It is appropriate to award the applicant the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for his period of service from 18 April 1968 through 17 April 1970. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for being wounded in action on 12 April 1969; b. awarding him...