IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 2 December 2013
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130004201
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests that his general discharge under honorable conditions be upgraded to an honorable discharge.
2. The applicant states he has learned a valuable lesson and wishes to continue his growth into an upstanding citizen.
3. The applicant provides no additional evidence.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 24 July 2001. Upon completion of initial entry training, he was awarded military occupational specialty 89B (Engineer). The highest rank/grade he attained while serving on active duty was specialist/E-4.
2. His military service record reveals:
a. he was referred to the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Program on 29 April 2004 following an alcohol-related incident.
b. he had several adverse counseling sessions for:
* being drunk on duty
* failing to report to accountability formations
* departing his appointed place of duty
* being disrespectful to a noncommissioned officer (NCO)
* drug abuse
* alcohol abuse
* anger management
* personal appearance
* potential for elimination from the service with a less than honorable discharge unless his duty performance and conduct improved
3. On 10 January 2005, the applicant's unit commander notified him he was initiating action which could result in separation from the Army with a general discharge under honorable conditions under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 14, for commission of numerous serious offenses: numerous occasions of failing to report to his place of duty, disrespecting an NCO, and reporting to work while under the influence of alcohol. He was advised of his rights and the impact of the discharge. He acknowledged receipt of the notification and his right to consult with counsel.
4. He consulted with legal counsel and was advised of the basis for the contemplated action to accomplish his separation for misconduct and its effects; the rights available to him; and the effects of any action taken by him in waiving his rights. He elected not to submit statements in his own behalf. He also indicated his understanding that if he received a discharge certificate or character of service which was less than honorable, he could make application to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) or the ABCMR for upgrading; however, he realized that an act of consideration by either board did not imply that his discharge would be upgraded.
5. The unit commander subsequently recommended that the applicant be separated from the service based on his commission of serious offenses. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general discharge under honorable conditions.
6. The separation authority approved the applicant's separation and directed that the applicant be separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, for misconduct commission of a serious offense. He determined his service would be characterized as under honorable conditions and that he would be issued a General Discharge Certificate.
7. On 11 February 2005, the applicant was discharged accordingly. His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) shows:
* his service was characterized as under honorable conditions
* he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c
* his narrative reason for separation was "Misconduct"
8. The applicant applied to the ADRB for an upgrade of his general discharge to an honorable discharge so he could utilize the GI Bill to further his education. On 26 January 2012, by letter, the applicant was advised that after careful review of his application, military records, his testimony, and all other available evidence, the ADRB determined he was properly and equitably discharged. Accordingly, his request for a change in the character and/or reason of his discharge was denied.
9. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 deals with separation for various types of misconduct and provides that individuals identified as offenders may be separated prior to their normal date of expiration of term of service. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impracticable or is unlikely to succeed. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally appropriate for a Soldier discharged under this chapter. However, the separation authority may direct a general discharge if such is merited by the Soldier's overall record.
10. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's contention that his record should be corrected by upgrading his discharge to an honorable discharge was carefully considered.
2. The evidence shows the applicant was properly and equitably discharged in accordance with the statutes and regulations in effect at the time. There is no indication of procedural errors which would have jeopardized his rights. All requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process. Further, the applicant's discharge accurately reflects his overall record of service.
3. Based on his record of indiscipline, the quality of the applicant's service clearly did not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel to warrant an honorable discharge. Therefore, he is not entitled to an upgrade of his general discharge to an honorable discharge.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
___x____ ____x____ ___x____ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ x_______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130004201
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130004201
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019805
The applicant requests an upgrade of his general discharge under honorable conditions and correction of the narrative reason for separation from misconduct to relief from active duty. On 10 April 2001, the separation authority (CG, III Corps and Fort Hood) approved the applicant's discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense and directed characterization of his service as under other than honorable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021343
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. On 29 July 1987, he was advised by his unit commander that he was initiating action to discharge him from the Army for misconduct under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 14, with a general, under honorable conditions characterization of service. He acknowledged he understood he could apply to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) or this Board for an upgrade of his discharge...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009879
If that is the case, then the Soldier should receive a general discharge under chapter 9. On 16 February 2012, the Division commander/separation authority directed that the separation action be referred to a standing administrative separation board, and stated that the board would determine whether the applicant should be discharged and recommend the appropriate characterization of service. Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions), paragraph 10-15(a) states that when...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012715
The applicant requests upgrade of his general discharge to an honorable discharge. On 31 January 2002, the applicant's squad leader counseled him pertaining to separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), chapter 14-12b, for misconduct. He further advised the applicant that he was taking the counseling statement to the first sergeant and company commander for further consideration.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004891
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 3 November 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason misconduct (serious offense). On 23 November 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, the evidence of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | ar20130011798
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012232
The board recommended the applicants discharge with characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. On 2 December 2011, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicants service record contains documentation that supports a diagnosis of several in-service medical conditions; however, a careful review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130012903
Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. The applicable Army regulation states there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization. However, Soldiers being processed for separation are assigned reentry codes based on their service records or the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130001967
The applicant requests to upgrade his characterization of service from general, under honorable conditions to fully honorable. On 1 September 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000467
Paragraph 10-1 (Reductions) of Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions) states, in pertinent part, that when the separation authority determines that a Soldier is to be discharged from the service under other than honorable conditions the Soldier will be reduced to the lowest enlisted grade. However, since the separation authority directed the issuance of a discharge under other than honorable conditions, in accordance with the governing regulation the applicant was...