IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 24 October 2013
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130004139
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests combat-related special compensation (CRSC) for hearing problems.
2. The applicant states:
a. He believes the decision by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) to deny his claim of CRSC for the hearing loss in his left ear and tinnitus to be in error. The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has conceded acoustic trauma and the medical evidence shows the loss was present before he left the service.
b. The 21 May 2012 letter from HRC shows that the denial of CRSC was due to "no official evidence indicating a combat award or exposure to weapons, tanks or aircraft..." and "no evidence in the claim to show that a combat related event caused the condition." His entire military career was served in combat units, such as Cavalry, Armor and Mechanized Infantry, and his assignments were either on the line or as a master gunner or training noncommissioned officer (NCO) all of which were exposed to live fire. The denial was arbitrary and capricious.
3. The applicant provides:
* DA Form 2860 (Claim for CRSC), dated 30 April 2012
* HRC CRSC denial letters, dated 21 May, 31 July, and 16 October 2012
* DD Form 2216 (Hearing Conservation Data), dated 2 December 1985
* DD Form 2215 (Reference Audiogram), dated 20 October 1983
* DD Form 2215, dated 29 December 1993
* Standard Form 513 (Medical Record Consultation Sheet), dated 29 April 1999
* page 3 of medical examination for retirement
* DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record Part II)
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant retired in the rank/grade of sergeant first class/E-7 on 31 March 2002.
3. He applied for CRSC for right shoulder tendiopathy, cervical strain, lumbar strain, tinnitus, and left ear hearing loss. He has consistently been denied CRSC for tinnitus and left ear hearing loss. The reasons listed for the denials are:
a. Left Ear Hearing Loss: "No official evidence indicating a combat award or exposure to weapons, explosions, tanks or aircraft in your claim."
b. Tinnitus: "No evidence in claim to show that a combat-related event caused condition."
4. The applicant provides:
a. copies of his CRSC request and three denial letters from HRC,
b. medical documents reflecting the status of his hearing, and
c. page 3 of a medical examination for his retirement showing he had a mild hearing loss and should protect his hearing.
5. The Under Secretary of Defense for Military Personnel Policy provided policy guidance for processing CRSC appeals. The guidance states there must be evidence of the condition having a direct, causal relationship to war or the simulation of war for a condition to be considered combat related.
6. CRSC, as established by Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1413a, as amended, provides for the payment of the amount of money a military retiree would receive from the VA for combat-related disabilities if it weren't for the statutory prohibition for a military retiree to receive a VA disability pension.
a. Payment is made by the Military Department, not the VA, and is tax free.
b. Eligible members are those retirees who have 20 years of service for retired pay computation (or 20 years of service creditable for Reserve retirement at age 60) and who have disabilities that are the direct result of armed conflict, especially hazardous military duty, training exercises that simulate war, or caused by an instrumentality of war.
c. Qualified disabilities must be compensated by the VA and rated at least 10-percent disabling.
d. Military retirees who are approved for CRSC must have waived a portion of their military retired pay because CRSC requires the Military Department to return a portion of the waived retired pay to the military retiree.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant contends he is eligible for CRSC for his hearing loss and tinnitus because the VA has conceded acoustic trauma and the medical evidence shows the loss was present before he left the service.
2. The applicant's requests for CRSC were denied because the available evidence failed to show his medical conditions were combat related. He has not provided any additional documentary evidence to indicate otherwise.
3. The CRSC criteria are specifically for those military retirees who have combat-related disabilities. Incurring disabilities while in a theater of operations or in training exercises is not, in and of itself, sufficient to grant a military retiree CRSC. The military retiree must show the disability was incurred while engaged in combat or while performing duties simulating war.
4. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship of the applicant's VA-rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is an insufficient basis on which to grant his request.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X___ ____X___ ___X__ _ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ X ______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120000988
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130004139
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130007201
The applicant states: * he has a valid hearing loss certified by the VA due to armor training, annual weapons qualification, and over 1900 hours of flight time in various helicopters from 1969 until 1988 * his aviation training started in 1969 and he earned his senior army aviator badge * due to military flight training, he failed many hearing tests from 1975 and 1976, that date forward, and was granted a waiver from 1976 through 1989, in order to pass a flight physical * he is requesting...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010150
Records showed the applicant had a back disability which pre-existed his service. However, the VA examiner stated he did not receive treatment from the VA for this claimed condition. Service-connection for VA purposes means the VA has determined that the disability was incurred or aggravated during military service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020373
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show that the leg injury he sustained on 23 January 1991 was caused by a simulation of war; therefore, in accordance with Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) guidelines it was combat-related and service-connected for the purpose of qualifying for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). Eligible members are those retirees who have...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011512
He provides: a. a MEDDAC Form 113, this 15 April 1975 Audiometric Evaluation Record shows an "H2" physical profile, secondary to acoustic trauma; b. a VA letter, this 26 May 1987 document informed the applicant that his hearing loss has been rated at 20 percent; c. a VA Rating Decision, dated 27 March 2010, informed the applicant that his impaired hearing had been reevaluated at 30 percent; and d. an HRC letter, dated 24 March 2011, denied the applicant's CRSC request upon reconsideration...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002114
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 31 July 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120002114 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states he was denied Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC) although his disabilities resulted from combat action in Vietnam. In his application, he stated he incurred the conditions during active combat in Vietnam.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019477
The applicant provides, in support of his request, copies of his separation documents, a "buddy statement, two Army medical records, a neurology consultation, civilian physical therapy records, and Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and CRSC rating decisions. The evidence of record shows the VA awarded the applicant a rating of 10% service-connected disability (emphasis added) for s/p lumbar strain. The CRSC Division, USA HRC, denied the applicant's request for CRSC based on s/p lumbar...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003955C070206
The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disabilities for impaired hearing (100 percent) and tinnitus (10 percent) be approved for Combat-Related Special Compensation (CRSC). The applicant provides the denial of his request to reconsider his CRSC application, excerpts from his military records, and VA rating decisions. Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s hearing loss and tinnitus to war or the simulation of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007466
His complete service and/or medical records are not available for review with this case; however, he provides a letter, dated 13 March 2012, from HRC-KNX denying his CRSC claim for tinnitus by reason of no official evidence indicating exposure to weapons, explosions, tanks, or aircraft in his claim. CRSC, as established by section 1413a, Title 10, U.S. Code, as amended, provides for the payment of the amount of money a military retiree would receive from the Department of Veterans Affairs...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001222C070206
Member Ms. Linda D. Simmons Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant concludes that his years of exposure to the noise of weapons fire caused his hearing loss, and weapons fire is combat related. The denial means that he will not be compensated for his hearing loss (and other service related disabilities not approved for CRSC) in the first group of military retirees being given this compensation.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001222C070206
Linda D. Simmons | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant concludes that his years of exposure to the noise of weapons fire caused his hearing loss, and weapons fire is combat related. The denial means that he will not be compensated for his hearing loss (and other service related disabilities not approved for CRSC) in the first group of military retirees being given this compensation.