Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004095
Original file (20130004095.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  24 October 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130004095 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her rank/grade as private first class (PFC)/E-3 instead of private (PV2)/E-2.

2.  The applicant states she was advanced to PFC/E-3 on 7 October 2011.  She has a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) stating she was advanced to PFC/E-3.  However, her DD Form 214 shows she was a PV2/E-2.  She noticed the error when her unit tried to advance her to PFC/E-3.  She is now concerned because she was not receiving the correct pay from 7 October 2011 to 2 August 2012.  Additionally, her application for educational benefits was also denied because of the incorrect pay grade on her DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214, dated 29 March 2012
* DA Form 4187, dated 7 October 2011
* DA Form 4187, dated 2 August 2012

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the California Army National Guard (ARNG) in the rank/grade of private/E-1 on 15 March 2011.  She was advanced to the rank/grade of PV2/E-2 on 26 June 2011.

2.  She entered active duty for training (ADT) on 18 July 2011 and she completed the required training for military occupational specialty 15N (Avionic Mechanic).  She was honorably released from ADT on 29 March 2012.  Her DD Form 214 shows in:

* item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) – PV2
* item 4b (Pay Grade) – E02
* item 12i (Effective Date of Pay Grade) – 2011  06  26

3.  She provides two DA Forms 4187 as follows:

	a.  A DA Form 4187, dated 7 October 2011, shows her advancement to PFC/E-3 with an effective date and date of rank of 7 October 2011 in accordance with Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions).

	b.  A DA Form 4187, dated 2 August 2012, shows her advancement to PFC/E-3 with an effective date and new date of rank of 16 March 2012 in accordance with Army Regulation 600-8-19.

4.  The case analyst of record contacted the applicant' chain of command on multiple occasions by email and telephone in an effort to establish the correct date of promotion.  The chain of command (specifically, the immediate commander), the battalion S-1, and the battalion personnel sergeant, failed to respond.

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-19 prescribes the enlisted promotion and reduction functions of the military personnel system.  Advancement from E-2 to E-3 requires 12 months of time in service and 4 months of time in grade.  Advancement to PFC may be waived at 6 months of time in service and 2 months of time in grade.

6.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  Chapter 2 contains guidance for preparation of the DD Form 214 and states that items 4a and 4b show the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of separation and are obtained from the Soldier's records (promotion or reduction orders).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was advanced to PV2/E-2 on 26 June 2011 and she entered ADT on 18 July 2011.  She was released from active duty, and her DD Form 214 shows her rank/grade a PV2/E-2 with an effective date of rank of 26 June 2011.  She provides two conflicting DA Forms 4187.  The first shows she was advanced to PFC/E-3 effective 7 October 2011 while the second shows she was advanced effective 16 March 2012.  It is unclear which DA Form 4187 is correct.

2.  Since she enlisted in the ARNG on 15 March 2011 and she was advanced to E-2 on 26 June 2011, the earliest she would have been advanced to PFC/E-3 with waivers would have been 15 September 2011 (a waiver of 6 months of time in service and 2 months of time in grade).  The first DA Form 4187 advancing her to PFC/E-3 effective 7 October 2011 does not indicate she received any waivers.

3.  The second DA Form 4187 shows she was advanced to PFC/E-3 effective 16 March 2012, which is before the ending date of her DD Form 214.  She would have been entitled to correction of her DD Form 214 if this DA Form 4187 is the correct one.

4.  There is insufficient evidence to determine which date the applicant was advanced to PFC/E-3.  As such, there is insufficient evidence to correct her DD Form 214.

5.  As for her pay issue, the applicant is advised to discuss pay issues with her chain of command, battalion S-1, or servicing finance officer.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130004095



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130004095



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003939

    Original file (20140003939.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) by: a. revoking the DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 24 February 2012, which erroneously advanced him from the rank/grade of private (PV1)/E-1 to the rank/grade of private (PV2)/E-2 and removing it from his AMHRR; b. amending the DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code for Military Justice (UCMJ)), dated 4 April 2012, to show he held the rank/grade of private first class...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020911

    Original file (20110020911.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Her DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) shows she was promoted as follows: * PV1- 23 December 1988 * PV2- 22 August 1989 * PFC - no entry * SPC - 16 February 1990 7. With regard to the rank/grade of E-1 recorded on the applicants DD Form 214; she enlisted in the USAR as a PV1 on 23 December 1988 and was promoted to PV2 on 22 August 1989. Additionally, the characterization of service for USAR Soldiers who successfully complete a period of IADT and are in entry level status is...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022224

    Original file (20110022224.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her military records to show her correct rank. The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) she was issued at the time shows in: * Item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) the entry "PFC" * Item 4b (Pay Grade) the entry "E03" * Item 12i (Effective Date of Pay Grade) the entry "2009 06 11" (11 June 2009) 4. While undergoing physical disability processing, she met the requirements for promotion to SPC on 11 June 2011 and a DA Form 4187...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016814

    Original file (20110016814.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reinstatement to the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 and correction of her records to show she was promoted to SGT/E-5 with a date of rank (DOR) of September 2004. The DD Form 214 she was issued for this period of service shows her rank as SGT and DOR as 1 February 2002. d. Based on the above, recommend that: * All documents in the applicant's file from 1 February 2002 to 23 November 2004 reflecting the rank of SGT be amended to reflect the rank of PFC * The Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017094

    Original file (20110017094.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of the DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her rank as specialist (SPC)/E-4. Chapter 2 contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214 and states that items 4a and 4b show the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at the time of separation and are obtained from the Soldier's records (promotion or reduction orders). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012291

    Original file (20090012291.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant's military service records show that she enlisted in the Army on 25 October 1994. The applicant's military service records contain a DD Form 214 which shows that she was discharged on 18 December 1995 after completing 1 year, 1 month, and 24 days of active service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007930

    Original file (20080007930.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. If a unit commander elects not to recommend a Soldier for promotion on the automatic promotion date, then a DA Form 4187 denying the promotion will be submitted not later than the 20th day of the month preceding the month of automatic promotion. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020569

    Original file (20110020569.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show his retired rank as specialist (SPC), pay grade E-4. He was placed on the retired list effective 30 March 2009, in the rank of SPC, pay grade E-4. Further, the Soldier will be promoted to the designated grade effective the Soldiers separation date.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008826

    Original file (20090008826.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction to her records to show she was promoted to the rank of specialist (SPC), pay grade E-4, and is entitled to back pay and allowances as a result of her promotion to pay grade E-4. The applicant submitted a copy of a DA Form 4187, dated 2 March 2007, showing her advancement/promotion to pay grade E-4 under the provisions of Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions), paragraph 2-3, with an effective date and date of rank of 20...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011433

    Original file (20140011433.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), ending on 12 May 1990, to show in: * Item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) - private first class (PFC) * Item 4b (Pay Grade) - E-3 * Items 12a-e (Record of Service) - Reserve Officers Training Corps (ROTC) service credit * Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbon Awarded or Authorized) - Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge * Item 14 (Military...