Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003063
Original file (20130003063.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130003063 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the removal of his "dishonorable discharge" from his records.  However, the applicant was in fact discharged from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) with an under other than honorable conditions discharge and it appears he desires to have his discharge upgraded.

2.  The applicant states he made a mistake when he was young because he could not obtain transportation to his unit for drills and finally gave up trying and subsequently was discharged for unsatisfactory participation.

3.  The applicant provides:

* a one-page self-authored letter explaining his application
* a copy of his high school diploma and résumé
* his Certificate of Marriage
* seven third-party letters
* a Certificate of Satisfaction
* a criminal history records check
* financial documents related to loans
* his homeowner’s association bulletin

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error 


or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the USAR in Richmond, VA on 1 February 1979 for a period of 6 years.  He was residing in Skippers, VA at the time of his enlistment.  At the time of his enlistment he acknowledged that he understood he was required to attend all unit training assemblies unless excused by proper authority and that five or more unexcused absences within a 1-year period could result in his being declared an unsatisfactory participant.  He was also advised if he was declared an unsatisfactory participant he could be discharged or ordered to active duty.

3.  He was ordered to initial active duty training (IADT) on 27 April 1979 and he was transferred to Fort Sill, OK to undergo his one-station unit training as a cannon crewman.

4.  On 20 July 1979, he was honorably released from IADT and he was returned to his USAR unit in Virginia.

5.  During the period of 16 September to 16 November 1981, the applicant’s commander sent four notices of unsatisfactory participation to the applicant using accountable mail.  The last notice informed the applicant that he had
12 unexcused absences.

6.  The specific facts and circumstances surrounding his administrative discharge are not present in the available records; however, a DA Form 2496 (Disposition Form), dated 26 April 1982, that is contained in his records and was prepared by the Staff Judge Advocate’s office at Fort Lee, VA indicates that 45 days had elapsed since the notification of separation had been sent to the applicant at his address in Skippers, VA.

7.  Orders Number D-04-907227, issued by the USAR Personnel Center, St. Louis, MO, dated 20 April 1985, discharged the applicant under the provisions of Army Regulation 135-178, effective 20 April 1985.  He was discharged with an under other than honorable conditions discharge 


8.  The applicant provides seven third-party letters who attest to his dependability, trustworthiness, attention to detail, willingness to help others, and his capability to get the job done.

9.  There is no evidence in the available records that shows the applicant petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board’s 15-year statute of limitations.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it must be presumed that the applicant’s administrative discharge was accomplished in accordance with applicable laws and regulations with no violations of any of the applicant’s rights.

2.  Likewise, it must also be presumed that his service was properly characterized based on his overall record of performance and the basis for his discharge at the time.

3.  The applicant’s contentions and supporting documents have been noted; however, lacking the specific facts and circumstances surrounding his discharge, there does not appear to be a basis to upgrade his discharge, especially since the applicant has admitted that he made the mistake of not satisfactorily participating in his Reserve meetings.

4.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary it must be presumed that the applicant was properly discharged and that his service was appropriately characterized.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X__  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _________X_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130003063



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130003063



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080020059

    Original file (20080020059.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's unit commander notified him in the 15 June 1991 letter that he had accumulated 9 unexcused absences within a 1 year period, that he decided not to excuse the absences, and that he was declaring the applicant an unsatisfactory participant and transferring him to the IRR for the balance of the applicant's military service obligation (MSO). The evidence of record confirms the applicant was REFRAD upon completion of his IADT after completing 5 months and 18 days. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017203

    Original file (20080017203.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides his active duty separation document (DD Form 214) and Army National Guard (ARNG) separation document (NGB Form 22) in support of his application. Chapter 7 of the version of the regulation in effect at the time of the applicant's discharge provided for the discharge of enlisted members from the ARNG for continuous and willful absence from military duty (unsatisfactory...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110010476

    Original file (20110010476.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 22 March 1979 for 6 years. The applicant's record is void of the circumstances surrounding his unexcused absences; however, the Commander, Company A, 3rd Battalion, 18th Infantry notified the applicant by certified mail that the unit's records showed he had been absent from scheduled Unit Training Assemblies (UTA) on 2 August 1981, 13 December 1981, 22 and 23 May 1982, and 12 and 13 June 1982. As such, he was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004473

    Original file (20090004473.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records further show that he was notified in writing of his unexcused absence and that each notification letter advised him that if he accumulated nine unexcused absences within a one year period, he could be declared an unsatisfactory participant and transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) for the balance of his service obligation. The records show that he acknowledged receipt of the notification letters as follows: a. on 10 March 1980, by certified letter, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013519

    Original file (20130013519.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her military record to: * show her rank/grade of private (PV2)/E-2 instead of private PV1/E-1) * show her correct time in service in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) * fulfill her Student Loan Re-payment Program (SLRP) agreement 2. The applicant states: * her rank of E-1 was given after a commanding officer in another unit made them give her a rank * her time in service is incorrect; she completed her 2-week drills and one weekend a month drills * she had...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014260

    Original file (20080014260.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that after being honorably released from active duty and being returned to his United States Army Reserve (USAR) unit in Glenview, Illinois, he attended drills for about 2 years before requesting of his first sergeant to be transferred to a unit in Chicago because he did not have transportation to get to his unit. There is no evidence in the available records to show that he ever applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110001290

    Original file (20110001290.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's records show he enlisted in the USAR on 13 July 1979. This regulation states that a member is an unsatisfactory participant when he or she accrues nine or more unexcused absences from scheduled drills during a 1 year period. There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide convincing evidence which shows he encountered problems with his car while serving in his USAR unit.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002837

    Original file (20090002837.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the under other than honorable conditions discharge that she received from the Army National Guard (ARNG) be upgraded to an honorable discharge. There is no evidence in the applicant's records that show she fulfilled the requirements of the conditional release. The applicant’s National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) shows she was separated with an under other than honorable conditions discharge, due to unsatisfactory...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150007495

    Original file (20150007495.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests: * correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his separation date as 17 December 1985 vice 25 October 1979 * upgrade of his under other than honorable conditions discharge from the U.S. Army Reserve to honorable 2. On 4 August 1982, Headquarters, First U.S. Army, Fort Meade, MD published Orders 149-20 ordering the applicant released from Company A, 99th Signal Battalion, and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075963C070403

    Original file (2002075963C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The record contains seven returned letters from the applicant’s USAR unit notifying him that he was being charged with either unexcused absences or being absent without leave (AWOL) from annual active duty training (AT). The first of these returned letters is for an unexcused absence of five drill periods, 10-12 April 1981. Further, it is not clear from the October 1982 memorandum whether the unit’s request was for evidence that the applicant had enlisted in the Navy or if it was for...