Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003032
Original file (20130003032.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  12 September 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130003032 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show award of the Army Commendation Medal. 

2.  The applicant states he was put in for the Army Commendation Medal just before he was separated.  He received it after leaving Vietnam.  However, after he got home, he misplaced this award. 

3.  The applicant does not provide any evidence. 

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 12 March 1969 and he held military occupational specialty 72C (Telephone Switchboard Operator). 

3.  He served in Vietnam from 28 September 1969 to 27 September 1970 and 15 May 1971 to 31 January 1972. 

4.  He was honorably released from active duty on 3 February 1972.  His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) does not list the Army Commendation Medal. 

5.  His records do not contain official orders showing he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal.  Additionally, item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show award of the Army Commendation Medal.

6.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Army Commendation Medal.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Army Commendation Medal may be awarded to any member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, while serving in any capacity with the Army after 6 December 1941, distinguishes himself or herself by heroism, meritorious achievement, or meritorious service.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

There is insufficient evidence in the available records that shows the applicant was awarded the Army Commendation Medal.  The governing Army regulation states that for personal decorations (which include the Army Commendation Medal) formal recommendation, approval through the chain of command, and announcement of orders are required.  In the absence of orders, there is insufficient evidence to correct his records to show this award. 





BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130003032





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130003032



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005097

    Original file (20140005097.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal (2nd Award) and the Army Commendation Medal. A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command failed to reveal orders that show the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010385

    Original file (20130010385.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 shows the following awards: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal * Good Conduct Medal * Vietnam Campaign Medal * two Overseas Service Bars 5. Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR)), paragraph 2-9, provides that the Board begins its consideration of each case with the presumption of administrative regularity. Although he provides a newspaper article stating he received the Army Commendation Medal, there are no...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000927

    Original file (20130000927.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * an Army Commendation Medal Certificate and Citation, dated 14 June 1969, wherein it shows he was awarded the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service in Vietnam during the period July 1968 to July 1969 * a Vietnam Combat Certificate, undated, issued by the 1st Cavalry Division wherein it shows he faithfully served in Vietnam with Battery C, 1st Battalion, 30th Artillery, from January to July 1969 7. The evidence of record is void of orders showing the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005325

    Original file (20120005325.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His record does not contain orders awarding him the Army Commendation Medal. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence in the available record that shows the applicant was awarded the Army Commendation Medal. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019111

    Original file (20140019111.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record does not contain orders for the Army Commendation Medal (1st or 2nd Awards). His record does not include orders awarding him the Army Commendation Medal (1st and 2nd Awards). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 15 July 1969 through 14 July 1971; and b. amending his DD Form 214 by deleting the Vietnam Service Medal and adding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011841

    Original file (20130011841.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Air Medal and two awards of the Army Commendation Medal. Regrettably, in the absence of orders, there is insufficient evidence to correct his DD Form 214 to show award of the Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award). As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting from his DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080011151

    Original file (20080011151.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 that he was issued at the time of his release from active duty, as amended by a DD Form 215, essentially shows that he was awarded the Air Medal, the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with Two Bronze Service Stars to signify that he participated in two campaigns during his service in Vietnam, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with "1960" Device, the Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar, and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012644

    Original file (20090012644.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military personnel records do not contain any orders or other evidence that shows he was awarded the Air Medal. There are no orders or other evidence in the applicant's military personnel records that shows he was awarded the Air Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for exemplary conduct, efficiency, and fidelity for the period 22 December...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000063

    Original file (20100000063.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he is entitled to the following unit awards for his service in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN): Army Presidential Unit Citation, Army Valorous Unit Award, Army Meritorious Unit [Commendation], RVN Presidential Unit Citation, RVN Gallantry Cross Unit Citation, and possibly others. The applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021015

    Original file (20090021015.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his Standard Form (SF) 88 (Report of Medical Examination) shows he sustained fragment wounds to his legs and his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), Item 41 (Awards and Decorations), shows award of the Purple Heart by General Orders Number 17847, Headquarters, 23rd Infantry Division. General Orders Number 17847, as listed in Item 41 of the applicant's DA Form 20, awarding him the Purple Heart was not available for review; however, available orders show he was...