Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002732
Original file (20130002732.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  12 September 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130002732 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the removal of a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)), dated 
1 March 2012, from his Army Military Human Resource Records, formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that the DA Form 2627 should be removed from his official records based on a commander’s inquiry that resulted in the dismissal of the Article 15 based on “Clear Injustice” as documented on DA Form 2627-2 (Record of Supplementary Action under Article 15, UCMJ) signed by his battalion commander on 24 January 2013.

3.  The applicant provides a list of documents submitted with his application.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was assigned to a Medical Logistics Company at Fort Hood, TX, when his unit deployed to Afghanistan in support of a medical task force.  The applicant was assigned as the stock control supervisor of the storage section of Class VIII medical supplies and equipment. 

2.  On 30 December 2011, the applicant’s commander (a promotable captain) appointed a first lieutenant as an investigating officer (IO) for a commander’s inquiry to conduct an investigation into the facts and circumstances surrounding the incident of improper/negligent operations in the warehouse storage section.

3.  Upon completion of the investigation, the IO recommended that the applicant be removed from his position as the storage noncommissioned officer in charge, that legal counsel be sought for UCMJ action, and that the applicant be counseled regarding his unethical practices.

4.  On 1 March 2012, nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against him for dereliction in the performance of his duties on divers occasions during the period 9 September to 30 December 2011 by failure to account for stock in the warehouse and for concealing excess medical supplies in unauthorized locations.  His punishment consisted of a forfeiture of pay and extra duty and restriction.  The imposing commander directed that the DA Form 2627 be filed in the performance section of his AMHRR.  

5.  The applicant elected to appeal his punishment but did not submit additional matters.

6.  On 6 March 2012, the applicant’s appeal was denied by a lieutenant colonel (LTC) commanding a veterinary detachment.  A legal review was conducted by the staff judge advocate of the 82d Airborne Division.  

7.  The applicant was reassigned to another location in Afghanistan and subsequently returned to Fort Hood in July 2012.

8.  On 23 October 2012, the applicant’s battalion commander (a LTC) appointed a major as a fact-finding officer to investigate the facts and circumstances surrounding the alleged improper or negligent operations in the Medical Logistics Company warehouse while deployed to Afghanistan between August and  December 2011.

9.  On 26 November 2012, the fact-finding officer submitted a memorandum indicating that after reviewing the evidence presented by the applicant, his chain of command, and the previous command inquiry, he found the allegations to be unfounded.

10.  On 4 December 2012, the applicant submitted an appeal of the imposition of the NJP to his battalion commander who was located at Fort Hood requesting that the punishment be set aside.

11.  On 3 January 2013, the battalion commander authored a memorandum in response to the applicant’s appeal in which he recommended that the NJP be revoked, that the documents related to the NJP be removed from his official records, that all monies withheld be returned to him, that his Good Conduct Medal be reinstated, and that he be submitted for an end of tour award.
12.  On 24 January 2013, the battalion commander completed a DA Form 2627-2 in which he set aside the punishment imposed on 1 March 2012 due to a clear injustice and designated himself as the superior authority.

13.  The DA Form 2627-2 is currently filed in the performance section of his AMHRR with no addenda or attachments.

14.  A review of his official records shows that the applicant also has a DA Form 2627, dated 15 January 2009, filed in the restricted section of his AMHRR.

15.  Army Regulation 27-10 (Military Justice) provides that the decision to file DA Forms 2627 in the performance or restricted section of the AMHRR would be determined by the imposing commander at the time punishment was imposed.  The filing decision of the imposing commander is final and is indicated in item 5 of the DA Form 2627. 

16.  Paragraph 3-28 (Setting Aside and Restoration) provides that this is an action whereby the punishment or any part or amount, whether executed or unexecuted, is set aside and any rights, privileges or property affected by the portion of the punishment set aside are restored.  NJP is “wholly set aside” when the commander who imposed the punishment, a successor-in-command, or a superior authority sets aside all punishment imposed upon an individual under UCMJ, Article 15.  In addition, the power to set aside an executed punishment and to mitigate a reduction in grade to a forfeiture of pay, absent unusual circumstances, will be exercised only within 4 months after the punishment has been executed.  When a commander sets aside any portion of the punishment after 4 months from the date punishment has been executed, a separate addendum of the unusual circumstances found to exist will be attached to the form containing the set-aside action.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that the DA Form 2627, dated 1 March 2012, and associated documents should be removed from his official records based on the set-aside action completed by his battalion commander on 24 January 2013 has been noted and appears to lack merit.

2.  The applicable regulation requires that an addendum be added to the DA Form 2627-2 that sets aside punishment after 4 months from the date punishment was imposed.  In the applicant’s case, 10 months had elapsed since the punishment and there is no addendum attached to the set-aside action     (DA Form 2627-2). 

3.  It is also noted that when the applicant’s unit deployed to Afghanistan in support of the medical task force, the unit was under the operational control of another command that had UCMJ appellate authority over the applicant.

4.  The applicant appealed his punishment to a higher authority and his appeal was denied by a LTC in command at the time.

5.  The applicant appealed his punishment again when he returned to his home station and his battalion commander (a LTC) designated himself as a superior authority and took action to set aside the punishment.  However, it is unclear as to how the battalion commander is or was a superior authority at the time he took the action.  Therefore, it does not appear that the actions taken or the manner in which they were executed were valid and in accordance with the applicable regulations.

6.  Accordingly, there appears to be no basis to remove the record of NJP from his official records as requested.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130002732





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130002732



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005931

    Original file (20140005931.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He stated that he had reviewed the applicant's appeal reference the NJP received on 1 March 2012 and other associated actions pertaining to this case. On 24 January 2013, LTC DDL signed a second DA Form 2627-2 setting aside the punishment of forfeiture of $801 pay imposed on 1 March 2012 based on a clear injustice. NJP may be imposed to correct, educate, and reform offenders who the imposing commander determines cannot benefit from less stringent measures; to preserve a Soldier's record of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016387

    Original file (20140016387.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records by removal of a DA Form 2627-2 (Record of Supplementary Action under Article 15, UCMJ) dated 23 January 2013 from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). The applicant states he is requesting that the DA Form 2627-2 signed on 23 January 2013 be completely removed from his OMPF based on the successful appeal of the Article 15 (nonjudical punishment (NJP)). The applicant provides copies of: * A Memorandum for Record, Assumption...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013380

    Original file (20130013380.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests setting aside of a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings under Article 15, UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice)), dated 8 August 2011. Moreover, the evidence of record shows the TDS attorney provided a memorandum to the battalion commander requesting consideration of specific matters when reviewing the applicant's Article 15. b. However, the evidence of record shows the applicant's TDS attorney for the appeal provided a memorandum to the brigade commander requesting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000802

    Original file (20140000802.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, removal from the restricted portion of his official military personnel file, now known as the Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR), all documents related to nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) to include a field grade letter of reprimand (LOR) issued based on the results of an Army Regulation (AR) 15-6 (Procedures for Investigating Officers and Boards of Officers) investigation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009782

    Original file (20130009782.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of the DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings under Article 15, UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice)), dated 8 January 2011, and allied documents that are filed in his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR), formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). b. Paragraph 3-31 (Procedure for submitting an appeal) provides that all appeals will be made on DA Form 2627 or DA Form 2627-1 (Summarized Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150011248

    Original file (20150011248.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of the DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings under Article 15, UCMJ (Uniform Code of Military Justice)), dated 8 September 2014, and the allied documents that are filed in her Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). He states the action to set-aside the NJP surpassed the 4-month limit due to a subsequent AR 15-6 (Procedures for IO and Boards of Officers) investigation of the imposing commander (CPT L___ K. C____, Commander, Company A, 209th ASB) that was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130010591

    Original file (20130010591.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. He states that when the subject spit in the applicant's face, the applicant took the subject to the ground. The applicant contends that the DA Form 2627, dated 20 April 2012, and the allied documents that are filed in his AMHRR should be removed because the DA Form 2627 was improperly administered without considering all the evidence and the DA Form 3975 should be corrected to show he is innocent of the charges.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016295

    Original file (20130016295.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). d. A DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, UCMJ) shows the applicant's battalion commander imposed NJP against him on 1 February 2012 for being derelict in the performance of his duties on 22 and 23 December 2011 by failing to secure all motor pool gates as it was his duty to do. There is no documentary evidence of error or injustice in the imposition of the NJP or in the filing decision.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000035

    Original file (20140000035.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of a DA Form 2627 (Record of Proceedings Under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)) from his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) (formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File). NJP is “wholly set aside” when the commander who imposed the punishment, a successor-in-command, or a superior authority sets aside all punishment imposed upon an individual under UCMJ, Article 15. The evidence shows the DA Form 2627 and allied...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008076

    Original file (20130008076.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) to: * remove non-judicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), dated 15 March 2012, (hereinafter referred to as the contested NJP) * restore his date of rank (DOR) to 1 August 2011 as his DOR to staff sergeant (SSG) * remove the Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Report (NCOER) for the period ending on 24 March 2012 2. He provided a Memorandum...