Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002632
Original file (20130002632.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  26 September 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130002632 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 8b (Authority and Reason) of his National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) to show a reason other than conviction by civil court.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, he was issued a letter resolution ordering dismissal of his civil case and expunction of his record because he met the conditions for parole.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 4 (Enlistment Contract – Armed Forces of the United States) effective 23 November 1974
* DD Form 214 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) effective 5 September 1975
* NGB Form 22 effective 11 May 1977
* letter from the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG), 29 March 2012
* Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Certificate of No Penal Record
* foreign documents
* Congressional correspondence
* social security card


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's available records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 21 December 1972.  He was discharged on 9 March 1973 for not meeting medical fitness standards.

2.  The complete facts and circumstances of his discharge from the ARNG are not available for review with this case.  Likewise, his ARNG records are not available for review with this case.  However, he provides an NGB Form 22 that shows:

	a.  He enlisted in the PRARNG on 23 March 1975.  He entered active duty for training on 8 May 1975 and he was released from active duty on 5 September 1975.  He held military occupational specialty 11B (Infantryman).

	b.  PRARNG Orders 86-2, dated 11 May 1977, discharged him by reason of conviction by civil court.  He was issued a general discharge.

3.  On 29 March 2013, the PRARNG notified the applicant that his petition for correction of his NGB Form 22 was considered, but it was denied.  Although he was issued a letter resolution ordering dismissal of his civil case and expunction of his records because he met the conditions of his parole, the fact remains that on the date of his separation he was still convicted.  His separation was valid and legal and met the standards set forth in applicable regulations at the time.

4.  National Guard Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management) establishes standards, policies, and procedures for the management of ARNG Soldiers.  Paragraph 8-26e provides for the discharge of ARNG enlisted Soldiers convicted by a civil court.

5.  Army Regulation 135-178 (ARNG and Army Reserve – Enlisted Personnel Separations) sets policies, standards, and procedures to ensure the readiness and competency of the U.S. Army while providing for the orderly administrative separation of ARNG and U.S. Army Reserve enlisted Soldiers for a variety of reasons.  Soldiers may be discharged for misconduct when it is determined under the guidance set forth in chapter 2, that the Soldier is unqualified for further military service by reason of a civil conviction.  Discharge action may be initiated against Soldiers when initially convicted by civil authorities or action is taken that is tantamount to a finding of guilty (to include a similar adjudication in juvenile proceedings).


DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The complete facts and circumstances surrounding the applicant's enlistment in and discharge from the PRARNG are not available for review with this case.  However, he provides an NGB Form 22 that shows he was discharged from the PRARNG on 11 May 1977 by reason of civil conviction.

2.  Pertinent Army and ARNG regulations provide for the discharge of enlisted Soldiers by reason of civil conviction.  The fact that a Soldier may have been paroled or satisfied the conditions of his court order does not negate the fact that the member was convicted by a civil court.

3.  The applicant does not provide sufficient evidence to show the narrative reason for his separation is in error or unjust.  Therefore, he is not entitled to the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130002632



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130002632



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20080016245

    Original file (AR20080016245.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s military personnel records show he enlisted in the ARNGUS and PRARNG for a period of 6 years on 12 January 1972 and was ordered to active duty for training (ACDUTRA) on 25 May 1972. The evidence of record shows that, on 13 July 2007, orders were issued that discharged the applicant from the ARNGUS and PRARNG on 13 May 2007 and transferred him to the USAR Control Group (Retired Reserve) effective 14 May 2007. As a result, the Board recommends that all State Army National...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017328

    Original file (20130017328.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 12 April 2006, he signed Annex E to DD Form 4, Enlistment Bonus Addendum, Army National Guard of the United States. He signed a DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing - Armed Forces of the United States) on 14 January 2008, applying for enlistment in the PRARNG. A DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document, Armed Forces of the United States) shows he enlisted in the PRARNG for a period of 7 years, 7 months, and 18 days.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019892

    Original file (20130019892.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he has 20 years of creditable service for retirement. The applicant provides copies of: * his history of events while in the ARNG, dated 21 October 2013 * a 21 October 2010 Army Review Boards Agency letter * a 2 July 2013 Connecticut National Guard letter * 22 August 2013 congressional correspondence * DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) ending 26 November 1973 * National Guard...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001059913C070421

    Original file (2001059913C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    During the period 6-21 July 1975, the FSM reported with his unit to Camp Salinas, Ponce, Puerto Rico, for 15 days of active duty for training (ADT). She asked for three items: (1) a line of duty investigation; (2) an NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation); and (3) verification that the FSM had been extended on ADT during the period 22 July 1975 through 12 August 1975. In order to be carried in a duty status, the FSM’s ADT tour would have had to have been extended from 21 July 1975 through the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017301

    Original file (20090017301.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests: a. revocation and/or amendment of his discharge from the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG) to not show a data code of "AD-W" and a reentry code of RE-3; b. the 26-27 September 2005 urinalysis results be expunged from his records; c. the PRARNG provide him all military pay, allowances, and retirement points from January 2006 to the present as though he had fully participated in all drills and annual training assemblies; and d. his return to the U.S. Army Reserve...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070007913C080213

    Original file (20070007913C080213.TXT) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provided an NGB Form 89 showing that a Federal Recognition Examining Board recommended the applicant for Federal Recognition on 24 August 2005. The advisory opinion recommended that the applicant’s initial appointment date be adjusted to 24 August 2005, the date the PRARNG approved the proceedings of a Federal Recognition examining board. The advisory opinion recommended that the applicant’s initial appointment date be adjusted to 24 August 2005, the date the PRARNG approved...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006707

    Original file (20130006707.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provides: * Self-authored statement, dated 30 March 2013 * Memorandum, Subject: Notification of Incentive Discrepancy and Exception to Policy Process, dated 20 January 2012 * Letter, dated 25 January 2012, addressed to State Incentive Manager * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 600-7-1-R-F (Annex F to DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document) - NPSEB Addendum - Army National Guard of the United States (ARNGUS)) * Annex E to DD Form 4 (NPSEB Bonus Addendum - ARNGUS) * Email...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008139

    Original file (20140008139.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. A DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status), dated 24 August 2000, shows he was treated on 18 August 2000 at the Troop Medical Clinic (TMC), Camp Beauregard, LA, for an injury that was incurred on that date. Medical records, dated between 18 August 2000 and 25 February 2002, show he was treated as follows: a.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014465

    Original file (20090014465.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his discharge from the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG) and transfer to the Retired Reserve be voided and that he be processed through the Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES). While it cannot be determined based on the available evidence the extent of the applicant's disabilities at the time of his REFRAD and discharge, there is sufficient evidence to show he was being treated for depression while on active duty and prior to his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022677

    Original file (20120022677.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: * correction of the date he was granted Federal recognition from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) to the Puerto Rico Army National Guard (PRARNG) * consideration by a mandatory promotion board under the fiscal year 2012 (FY12) criteria 2. The applicant states: * he was promoted to captain (CPT) on 15 August 2005 and reached his maximum years of service (7 years) for promotion consideration to major (MAJ) in August 2012 * his promotion packet was not submitted on time due...