Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002369
Original file (20130002369.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		 

		BOARD DATE:	  19 September 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130002369 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he entered active duty on 24 November 1979 and that he qualified as Expert with all of his weapons.

2.  The applicant states his DD Form 214 incorrectly reflects that he entered active duty 25 November 1980 instead of 24 November 1979 and it shows several weapons qualifications as Sharpshooter; however, he qualified as Expert with all weapons.

3.  The applicant provides two pages from his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was born on 13 May 1963.  He enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve under the Delayed Enlistment Program with parental consent on 22 July 1980 with a commitment to enlist in the Regular Army on 25 November 1980 for a period of 3 years under the airborne enlistment option for training as an indirect fire infantryman and assignment to the 1st Battalion, 75th Ranger Regiment.

3.  Orders published on 25 November 1980 by the Armed Forces Examining and Entrance Station in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, transferred the applicant and three other enlistees to Fort Benning, Georgia, to attend one-station unit training (OSUT) beginning on 1 December 1980.

4.  He began OSUT on 4 December 1980 and completed it on or about 5 March 1981.  He was then transferred to the airborne training battalion at Fort Benning where he completed airborne training.

5.  On 3 April 1981, he was assigned to the 1st Battalion, 75th Ranger Regiment, at Hunter Army Airfield, Georgia.  On 3 February 1982, he was assigned to the Combat Support Company, 3rd Battalion, 19th Infantry Regiment, at Fort Stewart, Georgia, and he was transferred to Company B of the same battalion on 10 February 1982.

6.  On 11 September 1982, he was discharged under other than honorable conditions in lieu of trial by court-martial.  He completed 1 year, 7 months, and 11 days of active service and had 77 days of lost time due to being absent without leave.

7.  His DD Form 214 issued at the time of his discharge shows he entered active duty on 25 November 1980 and he qualified as Sharpshooter with the rifle and hand grenade.

8.  A review of his official records shows no evidence that he entered active duty earlier than 25 November 1980.  His DA Form 2-1 also shows he qualified as Sharpshooter with the rifle and hand grenade.  There are no additional orders in his records to show otherwise.

9.  Award of marksmanship badges is not permanent.  An award for previous marksmanship weapons qualification is revoked automatically whenever an individual, upon completion of firing a record course for which the previous award was made, has not attained the same qualification.  In the event a badge is authorized for firing a limited or sub-caliber course, it is automatically revoked if a record service course is subsequently fired.

10.  Department of the Army Pamphlet 350-38 (Standards in Training Commission) provides commanders with the training strategies for individual, crew, and collective weapons training.  The pamphlet is structured by unit type (e.g., Armor, Infantry, Artillery, Military Police, etc.) instead of by weapon type; however, the basic requirements call for annual (or sooner) qualification with individual weapons.  This means, in effect, the most recent qualification score with a particular weapon denotes the degree of marksmanship badge the Soldier is eligible to wear.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he entered active duty on 24 November 1979 has been noted and found to lack merit.  The applicant was 17 years of age when he enlisted with parental consent in 1980 and thus would have been only 16 years of age in 1979 and would not have been eligible for enlistment.

2.  Additionally, the applicant's official records contain no evidence to support his contention and he failed to produce any evidence to dispute the evidence of record.

3.  In regard to his weapons qualifications, his DD Form 214 correctly reflects the entries contained in his official records regarding his weapons qualifications and he has provided no evidence to show they are in error.

4.  Accordingly, there appears to be no basis to grant his request to change his date of entry on active duty or weapons qualifications.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X___  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      __________X_______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130002369



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130002369



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076976C070215

    Original file (2002076976C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: In effect, that his record be corrected to show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). Further, the list of awards he received during his active duty tenure contained in Item 24 of the DD Form 214 he was issued upon his separation, which he verified with his signature, does not include the BSM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006160

    Original file (20120006160.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) to show the: * Legion of Merit (2nd Award) * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Bronze Star * Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal with "Arrowhead" * Valorous Unit Award * Special Forces (SF) Tab 2. This period of service entitles him to award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and correction of his records to show it. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050009914C070206

    Original file (20050009914C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 10 October 1984, the applicant was transferred to the 25th Infantry Division, Schofield Barracks, Hawaii, reporting for duty with the Combat Support Company, 1st Battalion, 5th Infantry Regiment on 5 December 1984, as a Scout Driver. There is no evidence in the available records to show that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board within the board’s 15 year statute of limitations. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003731

    Original file (20110003731.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests his record and DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected by documenting his completion of the Recondo School in 1988, and by adding the following awards: * Combat Parachute Badge * Presidential Unit Citation (PUC) * Army Achievement Medal (AAM) 2. Therefore, it would be appropriate to add this award to his record and DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008304

    Original file (20130008304.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DA Pamphlet 672-3 also shows his unit, Company C, 75th Infantry, was cited for the: * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, for the period 1 August 1965 through 16 April 1971, by DAGO Number 54, dated 1974 * Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, for the period 15 April 1969 through 16 March 1971, by DAGO Number 5, dated 1973 23. The evidence of record shows he was awarded two awards of the Army Good Conduct Medal. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002159

    Original file (20110002159.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * his orders for release from active duty * a letter, dated 1 May 2006, from a former sergeant in Company N, 75th Ranger Regiment * an email, dated 6 January 2011, from a former Ranger sergeant * an email, dated 7 January 2011, from the Secretary, 75th Ranger Regiment Association * Life Membership Certificate for the 75th Ranger Regiment Association * A DA Form 1577 (Authorization for Issuance of Awards), dated 2 January 1990 * his DD Form 214 CONSIDERATION OF...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004133C070206

    Original file (20050004133C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect that he was discharged in the pay grade of E-4 or E-5 and that he completed CBR (Chemical/Biological/Radiological) School. The applicant states that he served three years and was discharged in the pay grade of E-3. He was returned to military control on 8 September 1979 and the disposition of the charges against him is not present in the available records.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090474C070212

    Original file (2003090474C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On the date of his discharge, the applicant had completed 1 year, 3 months, and 4 days active Federal military service. The Combat Infantryman Badge does not appear on the applicant's DD Form 214. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060008113C070205

    Original file (20060008113C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his report of separation (DD Form 214) be corrected to reflect awards of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB), the Expert Infantryman Badge (EIB), the Ranger Tab, the Overseas Service Bar, the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), and any other awards to which he is entitled. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was awarded the EIB, the Ranger Tab, and the ARCOM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010630

    Original file (20120010630.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his request to have the awards of the Ranger Tab and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with M60 Machinegun bar added to his DD Form 214. The applicant states that he was assigned to 2d Battalion, 16th Infantry Regiment, 1st Infantry Division, which is a Ranger Regiment and is why he was awarded the Ranger Tab. He goes on to state that he was assigned to and fought with the Ranger unit for a year and he believes that he earned the Ranger Tab.