Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002359
Original file (20130002359.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  3 September 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130002359 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, an exception to policy to the Post-9/11 GI Bill that will allow him to transfer his education benefits to his family members.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was not made aware by his unit that he had to or could transfer his benefits before he retired.

3.  The applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and a letter from the National Guard Bureau (NGB) to his congressional representative.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant was serving in the New York Army National Guard (NYARNG) in the pay grade of E-6 when he was ordered to active duty in the Active Guard Reserve (AGR) Program on 30 October 2006.

2.  On 31 August 2010 he was retired by reason of sufficient service for retirement.  He had served 20 years, 5 months, and 22 days of creditable active service.

3.  On 7 May 2012, officials at the NGB dispatched a letter to the applicant’s congressional representative informing him that while the applicant was eligible to transfer his benefits while he was on active duty, he did not complete a request to transfer his benefits before he retired on 31 August 2010; therefore, was no longer eligible.
4.  Public Law 110-252, section 3319, dated 22 June 2008, authorized the transfer of unused education benefits to family members.  The law provided that the Secretary of Defense would prescribe the implementation of the program.  It also provided that eligible participants must be serving as a member of the Armed Forces when the transfer is executed.

5.  On 22 June 2009, the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense released Directive-Type Memorandum 09-003 – Post-9/11 GI Bill that announced individuals serving in the Armed Forces could effect a transfer of the GI Bill benefits effective 1 August 2009.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contentions and supporting documents have been noted.  However, according to the applicable law and regulation, he is not eligible to transfer benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill transferability program.  He retired from the Army on 31 August 2010 and there is no record of his transferring his educational benefits prior to his retirement.  

2.  The Departments of the Army, Defense, and Veterans Affairs initiated a massive public campaign plan that generated major communications through military, public, and social media venues.  Information on the Post-9/11 GI Bill and subsequent transfer of entitlements was published well in advance of its implementation.

3.  While the sincerity of the applicant’s claim that he was not informed that he could make the transfer is not in doubt, the evidence submitted with his application and the evidence of record does not support his claim.  Therefore, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___x____  ___x____  ___x_____  DENY APPLICATION



BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130002359



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130002359



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014247

    Original file (20130014247.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states, in effect, he was never advised that he had to or could transfer his benefits before he retired. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001063

    Original file (20140001063.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The NGB Form 22, dated 29 July 2012, as provided by the applicant provides the following – * service in the Army/Army National Guard of the United States (ARNGUS)/GAARNG * net service this period – 35 years and 20 days * prior Reserve service – 1 month and 3 days * prior active Federal Service – 2 years, 2 months, and 24 days * total service for pay – 37 years, 4 months, 17 days * total service for retirement pay – 35 years, 5 months, and 20 days * transfer to the Retired Reserve * Authority...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019878

    Original file (20110019878.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests adjustment of the date he was transferred to the Retired Reserve so he can transfer educational benefits under the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) provisions of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his family members. The official stated the applicant's last day of service with the ARNG was 31 August 2010 but he did not transfer his benefit prior to this date. c. A Soldier may only transfer to eligible dependents.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008986

    Original file (20120008986.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He stated he served a total of 50 months post-9/11, to include Bosnia-Herzegovina, Iraq, and homeland defense. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service. The evidence of record shows he was fully eligible to transfer his educational benefits under the TEB prior to his retirement on 31 August 2010, but did not do so.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021113

    Original file (20110021113.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant stated he was not informed of the requirement to transfer his benefits during his demobilization in February 2010, retirement on 1 August 2010, or at any time during his service. e. However, upon a review of the applicant's application, military records, and review by the GI Bill Benefits manager, they determined the applicant did not transfer his Montgomery GI Bill to Post-9/11 GI Bill while in service to comply with Post-9/11 GI Bill policies by transferring his benefits...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009431

    Original file (20120009431.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that the Army National Guard (ARNG) did not properly inform him during the time of his retirement that he could transfer his education benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement from the ARNG. The advisory official stated the applicant was eligible for Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits; however, he did not complete a request to transfer benefit on the Department of Defense's (DOD's) TEB online database before he left the service. Contrary to the basis for the approval...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010052

    Original file (20120010052.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an exception to policy to transfer educational benefits under the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his family members. The advisory official recommended granting relief to the applicant because he had transferred 4 months of benefits to his dependent prior to his retirement and he is eligible to transfer additional benefits in his retirement. On 22 June 2009, the Department of Defense (DOD) established the criteria for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006799

    Original file (20120006799.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 June 2009, the DOD established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused education benefits to eligible family members. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of reserve service. The policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide active duty participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying active duty service individual pre-separation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005605

    Original file (20120005605.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests, in effect, an exception to policy to the Post-9/11 GI Bill that will allow him to transfer his education benefits to his family members. While the sincerity of the applicant’s claim that he was not informed that he had to be on active duty to complete a transfer of his benefits prior to retiring is not in question, the evidence submitted with his application and the evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020085

    Original file (20110020085.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * He had already outprocessed and was on transition leave at the time this program was implemented * He did not get the information or was not informed of the requirements to declare family members he could transfer his MGIB benefits to prior to retiring * The information available at the time of his retirement was conflicting and confusing * He retired on 31 August 2009 and like many others, little information was available about this program 3. The advisory official...