Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002238
Original file (20130002238.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  29 August 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130002238 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show his name as "G----I D--a" vice "K----a R---e D--a."

2.  The applicant states he legally changed his name on 7 August 2012.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 4 June 2009
* Court Order on Petition for Change of Name, dated 7 August 2012
* Indiana Operator License issued on 9 August 2012
* Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Identification Card

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 23 June 2005 as a female and he held military occupational specialty 92A (Automated Logistical Specialist).  

3.  All of the documents contained in his military record list his name as
"K----a R----e D--a."  Additionally, the following documents contain his official or digital signature wherein he signed his name as either "K----a R---e D--a,"
"K----a R. D--a," or "K-----a D--a."

* DD Form 2366 (Montgomery GI Bill Act of 1984 - Basic Enrollment)
* SGLV Form 8286 (Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance Election and Certificate)
* DD Form 93 (Record of Emergency Data)

4.  His Enlisted Record Brief and separation orders show his name as
"K----a R---e D--a."

5.  He was honorably released from active duty on 4 June 2009.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows his name as "K----a R---e D--a."

6.  He provided a court order, dated 7 August 2012, that changed his name from "K----a R---e D--a" to "G----I D—a."  He also provided his Indiana Operator License and VA Identification Card that list his name as "G----i D--a."

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant used the name "K----a R---e D--a" during his military service.  Additionally, all of his military documents show his name as " K----a R---e D--a."  On 4 June 2009, he was honorably released from active duty as "K----a R---e D--a" and this name is listed on his DD Form 214.

2.  He never used the name "G----I D--a" during his period of military service because his name was not legally changed to "G----I D--a" until 7 August 2012, more than 3 years after his release from active duty service.

3.  For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records.  The data and information contained in those records should reflect 
the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, there is a reluctance to recommend that those records be changed.  While it is understandable the applicant desires to now record his changed name in his military records, there is not a sufficiently compelling reason for compromising the integrity of the Army’s records at this late date.

4.  The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document will be filed in his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR), formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).  This should serve to clarify any questions or confusion in regard to the difference in the name recorded in his military record and to satisfy his desire to have his changed name documented in his AMHRR.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130002238



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130002238



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011572

    Original file (AR20130011572.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, he would like to reenlist in the military. Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 1 June 2010 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure, AR 635-200, Chapter 9, JPD, RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: Bravo Battery, 4th Battalion, 1st Field Artillery, Fort Bliss, TX f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 20 January 2009/3 years, 18 weeks g. Current Enlistment Service: 1 year, 4 months, 12 days h. Total Service:...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005600

    Original file (20130005600.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his birth name. The applicant's DD Form 1966 (Application for Enlistment - Armed Forces of the United States), completed by the applicant on 13 July 1983, shows in: a. section I (Personal Data), block 2 (Name - Last, First, Middle Name), his last name as "K---"; b. section X (Statement of Name for Official Military Records), item 48, shows, "If the preferred enlistment name...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015695

    Original file (20110015695.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his full name as "K-----h D-----e B-----s B---r," instead of "K----h D----e B----s." 2. The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document, which confirms his correct full name, will be filed in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120014476

    Original file (20120014476.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 15-185 (Army Board for Correction of Military Records), paragraph 2-5, states the Board will not consider any application if it determines that the applicant has not exhausted all administrative remedies available. His rater stated, "[Applicant] did not meet the standards of Army Military Medicine. The OSRB denied his appeal on 28 July 2011, stating: * it is unlikely that his medical problems started during the 4-5 months of his residency training * only one diagnosis...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130009666

    Original file (AR20130009666.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence contained in the applicant’s service record indicates that on 31 July 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason misconduct (serious offense). The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, after examining the applicant’s record of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002290

    Original file (20130002290.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states he enlisted for a $10,000.00 bonus in 2009. The applicant's DD Form 1966 (Record of Military Processing – Armed Forces of the United States) shows he applied for enlistment in the ARNG of the United States and LAARNG for, in part, training in MOS 25B. Records show the applicant enlisted for an NPSEB for CS MOS 25B in the amount of $10,000.00.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003800

    Original file (20120003800.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his middle and last names be changed on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. His enlistment record and service personnel records show the full name of Cxxx Rxxx.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130003793

    Original file (AR20130003793.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 6 August 2012, the separation authority, after careful consideration of the applicant's separation packet and recommendation of the chain of command, denied the applicant's request for conditional waiver of his separation. An administrative separation board was appointed to determine whether the applicant should be separated under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 13. On 24 September 2012, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009318

    Original file (20120009318.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. His available record also contains the following documents that list his first name as Aaron and signed by the applicant using the same first...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130006854

    Original file (AR20130006854.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    h. receiving another Company Grade Article 15 on 2 February 2011, for failing to report to his appointed place of duty on four separate occasions, failing to obey a lawful general regulation, and making a false official statement. On 6 September 2012, the separation authority, waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general...