Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001954
Original file (20130001954.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	    12 September 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130001954 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states:

* he was never awarded the Purple Heart for combat injuries sustained during the Vietnam War in July 1968
* the reported incident was documented in his service medical records on 1 July 1968, 4 July 1968, and 11 July 1968

3.  The applicant provides:

* 2-page medical records extract
* Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Form 21-4138 (Statement in Support of Claim)
* letter, Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR), dated 13 January 2012
* DD Form 214
* DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214)





CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 29 March 1967.  He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).

3.  He served in Vietnam from 4 September 1967 to 1 September 1968.  While in Vietnam, he was assigned to:

* Company C, 1st Battalion, 16th Infantry, 1st Infantry Division from 13 September 1967 to 7 June 1968
* Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 3rd Brigade, 1st Infantry Division from 8 June to 22 June 1968
* Company C, 1st Battalion, 16th Infantry, 1st Infantry Division from 23 June to 1 September 1968

4.  He was released from active duty on 30 April 1970.  His DD Form 214 does not show award of the Purple Heart. 

5.  There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart.  Additionally, there is nothing in the typical sources below that show he was wounded/injured as a result of hostile action:

	a.  Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show a combat wound or injury.  Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System), chapter 9, stated a brief description of wounds or injuries (including injury from gas) requiring medical treatment received through hostile or enemy action, including those requiring hospitalization would be entered in item 40 of the DA Form 20.  This regulation further stated that the date the wound or injury occurred would also be placed in item 40.
	b.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System maintained by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, which is an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to him.

	c.  His name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty listing.  This is a microfiche listing of Vietnam Era casualties that is used to verify entitlement to the Purple Heart.

6.  On 11 April 2007, the Army Review Boards Agency Support Division, St. Louis, MO, issued the applicant a DD Form 215 adding additional awards and decorations to his DD Form 214.

7.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, DD Form 215, VA Form 21-4138, and a letter from the ABCMR, dated 13 January 2012, in which he was advised his case was administratively closed due to his records being unavailable.  He was advised to resubmit his request in 90 days.  He also provides a 2-page medical records extract which shows he was treated at an aid station on 1 July 1968 and that he suffered an injury to his ear from a gun blast.  He was also treated at the aid station on 4 July and 11 July 1968 for his ear.  The medical record extracts do not show the gun blast occurred due to hostile action or was incurred while in combat.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against and enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The criteria for the Purple Heart requires the submission of substantiating evidence to verify that the injury/wound was the result of hostile action, the injury/wound must have required medical treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

2.  The applicant's service record is void of any evidence that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action.  

3.  Therefore, in the absence of documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action and treated for those wounds, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for awarding him the Purple Heart.
BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X____  ___X____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _ X _______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130001954



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130001954



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002745

    Original file (20130002745.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings (ROP) in Docket Number AR20100027520 * Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rating Decision * 33 pages of progress notes and allied documents from the VA CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. His record contains a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) which does not show his record was corrected to show award of the Purple Heart or Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150003307

    Original file (20150003307.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 October 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150003307 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20130016895, dated 10 June 2014. In this case, the applicant's name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster, his DA Form 20 does not show he was wounded in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015611

    Original file (20100015611.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of this form does not list the Purple Heart or the CIB. Additionally, appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Decorations and Awards) provides that during the Vietnam era the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. Notwithstanding his sincerity, in the absence of additional documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022453

    Original file (20120022453.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20110014555, on 12 January 2012. It also states in order to award the Purple Heart there must be evidence of the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, the wound required treatment by medical personnel, and a record of the medical treatment...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100024384

    Original file (20100024384.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart with Oak Leaf Cluster, Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation (2nd Award), RVN Civil Actions Honor First Class Unit Citation, Meritorious Unit Commendation, and RVN Gallantry Cross with Silver Star. The applicant provides his DD Form 214, effective 5 June 1970; DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), dated 2...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011980

    Original file (20140011980.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 does not show award of either the Combat Infantryman Badge or the Purple Heart. The applicant's records contain an SO which awarded him the Combat Infantryman Badge and, as such, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. With respect to the applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show the award of the Purple Heart, his service record is void of any documentary evidence showing he received this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090019053

    Original file (20090019053.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. Therefore, it appears the applicant met the eligibility criteria for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (first award) for the period 29 March 1967 through 15 April 1969, ending with a period of active service of less than 3 years but more...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018515

    Original file (20130018515.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Purple Heart and Bronze Star Medal with "V" Device. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he received all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings throughout his military service. Although the applicant provided medical records that show he was treated in Vietnam for injuries...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060000092C070205

    Original file (20060000092C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army (DA) Pamphlet 672-3, Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register, dated 29 January 1988, which lists unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam, shows that the unit the applicant was assigned to, 1st Battalion, 22d Infantry Regiment, 4th Infantry Division, was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross, with Palm, Unit Citation, for the period 1 August 1965 through 16 April 1971, by Department of the Army General Order (DAGO) Number 54, dated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016240

    Original file (20130016240.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 15 November 1967 through 17 April 1970...