Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001765
Original file (20130001765.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  13 August 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130001765 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) be awarded to his records.

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  he was awarded the BSM for meritorious achievement in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) during the period 1 August to 30 September 1969; and

   b.  while he received the BSM certificate, he never received the actual medal.

3.  The applicant provides:

* Statement of Support
* BSM Citation

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's military record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States and entered active duty on 23 April 1968.  He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty 13A (Field Artillery Basic).

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the RVN from 23 April 1968 to 20 January 1970.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not include the BSM among its list of awards.

4.  His Army Military Human Resource Record (AHMRR) (previously known as official military personnel file) does not contain any documents to show he was recommended for or awarded the BSM.

5.  His AMHRR contains, Headquarters, 25th Infantry Division, General Orders Number 13137, dated 24 October 1969.  It announced his award of the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious achievement in connection with military operations against a hostile force while serving in the RVN from 1 August 1969 to 30 September 1969.

6.  On 22 January 1970, the applicant was released from active duty after completing 1 year and 9 months of creditable active duty service.  The DD Form 214 issued him shows he earned the following awards:

* Army Commendation Medal
* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* RVN Campaign medal

7.  The applicant provides a letter from his wife wherein she supports his request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show award of the BSM.  He also provides a BSM citation that indicates he was awarded the BSM for meritorious achievement in the RVN during the period 1 August to 30 September 1969.

8.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the Army's awards policy.  It provides that with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.  

   a.  Paragraph 1-19 contains guidance on duplication of awards.  It states that only one decoration will be awarded to an individual or unit for the same act, achievement, or period of meritorious service.  Continuation of the same or similar type service already recognized by an award for meritorious service or achievement will not be the basis for a second award.  
   
   b.  Paragraph 3-14 contains guidance on award of the BSM and states it is awarded for heroic acts, or meritorious achievement or service, of a lesser degree than required for the Silver Star.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant claims entitlement to the BSM.  There is insufficient evidence to support this claim.

2.  The evidence of record in this case is void of any orders or other documents that indicate the applicant was recommended for or awarded the BSM by proper authority while serving on active duty.  Further, the BSM is not included in Item 41 of his DA Form 20.  

3.  Finally, there are no BSM orders pertaining to the applicant on file in the ADCARS maintained by HRC.  As a result, absent any evidence of record corroborating the information contained on the citation provided by the applicant, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support adding the BSM to his record and separation document at this late date.

4.  The BSM citation provided by the applicant shows it was awarded for meritorious achievement in the RVN for the period 1 August to 30 September 1969.  His AMHRR also contains an ARCOM order showing he received this award for the same reason and period.  Given that the regulatory criteria prohibits duplicate awards to an individual or unit for the same act, achievement, or period of meritorious service, it is highly likely the appropriate award approval authority downgraded the recommendation for the applicant's BSM to the ARCOM.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X___  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _ X  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130001765



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130001765



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010890

    Original file (20080010890.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The period of meritorious achievement listed on the BSM Certificate provided by the applicant, which is 1 September 1968 through 30 April 1969, overlaps the period for which the applicant was awarded the ARCOM and therefore is a duplicate award, which is prohibited by the governing regulation. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017982

    Original file (20080017982.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The AM orders, certificate, and citation provided by the applicant are sufficiently credible to support a conclusion that the applicant was in fact awarded the AM while serving in the RVN. The evidence of record is void of any orders or other documents that indicate the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the BSM by proper authority while serving on active duty.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008603

    Original file (20090008603.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 1 October 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090008603 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). His record does contain Headquarters, Americal Division, General Orders Number 6922, dated 23 July 1969, which awarded the applicant the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) for meritorious service in the RVN from January through July 1969.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002086C071029

    Original file (20070002086C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains Headquarters, United States Army Support Command, Da Nang General Orders Number 506, dated 27 July 1969, which awarded the applicant the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) for meritorious service during the period September 1968 through July 1969. It states, in pertinent part, that a bronze service star is authorized with this award for each campaign a member is credited with participating in while serving in the RVN. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006726

    Original file (20090006726.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The BSM and CIB are individual awards, not authorized unit awards. The evidence of record is void of any orders or other documents that indicate the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the BSM by proper authority while serving on active duty. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011574

    Original file (20120011574.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows he was awarded or authorized the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) * Vietnam Campaign Medal * ARCOM * Combat Infantryman Badge * Air Medal (5th Award) 9. In light of his overall record of service, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM (1st Award) based on completion of a qualifying period of active Federal service from 4 February 1969 to 23 November 1970 and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010233C080407

    Original file (20070010233C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's MPRJ is void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the BSM while serving on active duty. The applicant's record is void of any orders, documents, or an award recommendation that shows he was ever recommended for the BSM while serving on active duty. The evidence of record also shows that based on his RVN service and campaign participation, the applicant is entitled to the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and 1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060015238

    Original file (20060015238.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    During its original review of the applicant's request for the PH, the Board found no evidence of record to show that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action or that he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty. The applicant's record is void of any orders, or other documents that indicate he was ever wounded in action, or that show he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004346

    Original file (20110004346.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device and all unit awards he is entitled to that were not awarded prior to his release from active duty. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to correction his DD Form 214 to show the BSM (2nd Award) and with "V" Device. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100020997

    Original file (20100020997.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The two BSM certificates provided by the applicant show he was awarded the BSM (first award) for the period December 1969 to November 1970 on 5 December 1970. The applicant provides two BSM Certificates that show two awards of the BSM; however, they are for the same period of meritorious service and his records only contain orders for one award of the BSM. However, the applicant's records do contain orders awarding him the Air Medal.