Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001729
Original file (20130001729.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		

		BOARD DATE:	  17 September 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130001729 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to shows award of the Ranger Tab.

2.  The applicant states he received Ranger training, completed reconnaissance missions, and served with Ranger units in Vietnam.  His records show he was assigned to the following units:

* Company K, 75th Infantry, 4th Infantry Division
* Company F, 75th Infantry (Rangers), 25th Infantry Division
* Company H, Infantry (Rangers), 1st Calvary Division (Airmobile)

3.  The applicant provides page 3 of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), two newspaper articles, and the Ranger Tab award criteria.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 28 February 1968 for a period of 3 years.  He was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).

3.  The applicant's DA Form 20, coupled with his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), show in:

   a.  item 31 (Foreign Service) and item 5 (Oversea Service):  Vietnam from:

* 9 December 1968 through 8 December 1969
* 5 August 1970 through 19 February 1971

   b.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments):

* Rifleman - Company A, 1st Battalion, 8th Infantry, 4th Infantry Division, from 14 December 1968 through 16 April 1969
* Rifleman - Company F, 1st Battalion, 8th Infantry, 4th Infantry Division, from 17 April through 18 August 1969
* Rifleman with duty Long-Range Reconnaissance Patrol - Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1st Brigade, 4th Infantry Division, from 
19 August through 6 October 1969
* Senior Scout Observer - Company K (Ranger), 75th Infantry,
4th Infantry Division, from 7 October through 5 December 1969
* Automatic Rifleman - Company A, 4th Battalion, 11th Infantry, 
25th Infantry Division, from 6 August 1970 through 12 September 1970
* Automatic Rifleman - Company F, 75th Infantry (Rangers),
25th Infantry Division, from 13 September through 28 November 1970
* Automatic Rifleman - Company H, 75th Infantry Platoon (Rangers), 
1st Calvary Division (Airmobile), from 29 November 1970 through
   16 February 1971

   c.  item 27 (Military Education) and item 17 (Civilian Education and Military Schools) do not show he completed Ranger training; and

   d.  item 44 (Award and Decorations) and item 9 (Awards, Decorations and Campaigns) do not list the Ranger Tab.

4.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows he entered active duty on 28 February 1968, he was honorably released from active duty on 20 February 1971, and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training).  He 
completed 2 years, 11 months, and 23 days of net active service that included 
1 year, 6 months, and 15 days of foreign service.

   a.  Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) does not show the Ranger Tab.

   b.  Item 25 (Education and Training Completed) does not show Ranger training.

5.  A review of the applicant's military records failed to reveal any evidence that he completed Ranger training or that he was awarded the Ranger Tab.

6.  In support of his request, the applicant provides two newspaper articles (the source of publication and dates are not identified) that show:

   a.  the applicant was awarded the Combat Infantryman Badge and the Army Commendation Medal for heroism; and

   b.  he was stationed at Cu Chi in Vietnam; assigned to Company F, 
75th Infantry (Rangers); there were 121 volunteers in the unit that operated in teams to gather information about the enemy's strength, location, and movements; and he returned home in late February (1971).

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning military awards and decorations.  It shows the Ranger Tab is awarded for successful completion of a Ranger course conducted by the U.S. Army Infantry School or the Ranger Training Command at Fort Benning, GA.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Records show the applicant was assigned to several Ranger units and he successfully performed his assigned duties in Vietnam.

2.  The governing Army regulation is clear that award of the Ranger Tab is based upon successful completion of a Ranger course conducted by the U.S. Army Infantry School or the Ranger Training Command.

3.  There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant completed Ranger training or that he was awarded the Ranger Tab.
4.  Therefore, based on the available evidence, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to grant the applicant's requested relief in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X______  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others to know that the sacrifices he made in service to the United States during the Vietnam War are deeply appreciated.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      _______ _ X  _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130001729



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130001729



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080016308

    Original file (20080016308.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no Special Orders in the applicant’s record that show he was promoted to SGT/E-5. The evidence of record shows that the applicant served in Korea from on or about 28 May 1969 to on or about 25 November 1969; therefore, he served a qualifying period for award of the Korea Defense Service Medal and is entitled to correction of his records to show this award. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008304

    Original file (20130008304.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    DA Pamphlet 672-3 also shows his unit, Company C, 75th Infantry, was cited for the: * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, for the period 1 August 1965 through 16 April 1971, by DAGO Number 54, dated 1974 * Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation, for the period 15 April 1969 through 16 March 1971, by DAGO Number 5, dated 1973 23. The evidence of record shows he was awarded two awards of the Army Good Conduct Medal. As a result, the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001564

    Original file (20150001564.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * Parachutist Badge * Special Forces (SF) Tab * one additional Bronze Star Medal * Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award) with “V” Device * Air Medal * all unit awards he may be eligible to receive 2. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004106316C070208

    Original file (2004106316C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that his records be corrected and that he be issued the following awards: Purple Heart (PH), Good Conduct Medal (GCMDL), Bronze Star Medal (BSM), 4 awards, Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge, and that he be given a battlefield commission to the rank of second lieutenant. The applicant’s military records show he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 5 September 1969. This document shows the units to which the applicant was assigned were...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064441C070421

    Original file (2001064441C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT REQUESTS: That his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show award of the Purple Heart (PH). EVIDENCE OF RECORD : The applicant's military records show:

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010630

    Original file (20120010630.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his request to have the awards of the Ranger Tab and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with M60 Machinegun bar added to his DD Form 214. The applicant states that he was assigned to 2d Battalion, 16th Infantry Regiment, 1st Infantry Division, which is a Ranger Regiment and is why he was awarded the Ranger Tab. He goes on to state that he was assigned to and fought with the Ranger unit for a year and he believes that he earned the Ranger Tab.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006160

    Original file (20120006160.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) to show the: * Legion of Merit (2nd Award) * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Bronze Star * Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal with "Arrowhead" * Valorous Unit Award * Special Forces (SF) Tab 2. This period of service entitles him to award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and correction of his records to show it. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003090459C070212

    Original file (2003090459C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    While assigned to Company F, 75th Infantry (Rangers), he was awarded the CIB. The applicant's records contain a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), dated 22 May 2002, which corrects his DD Form 214 to show the Vietnam Service Medal w/4 bronze service stars, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation Badge, and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation. The evidence of record...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021306

    Original file (20130021306.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was not awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal, but he served a period of continuous, honorable active duty enlisted service from 5 September 1968 through 30 August 1970: a. there is no evidence of any disciplinary action, adverse information, or commander’s disqualification for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal; b. he had all "Excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings except for the period he was a student in Ranger Training where his efficiency was marked as "Good";...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021306

    Original file (20130021306 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was not awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal, but he served a period of continuous, honorable active duty enlisted service from 5 September 1968 through 30 August 1970: a. there is no evidence of any disciplinary action, adverse information, or commander’s disqualification for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal; b. he had all "Excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings except for the period he was a student in Ranger Training where his efficiency was marked as "Good";...