Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001477
Original file (20130001477.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  3 September 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130001477 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests an upgrade of his general discharge to honorable.

2.  The applicant states he:

* was a good Soldier
* did his job without any complaint
* helped his coworkers with their assignments
* did extra voluntary work
* attended multiple classes just to keep busy
* excelled at the work he did

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 12 August 2009 for a period of 4 years.  He completed his training and was awarded military occupational specialty 27D (paralegal specialist).  He attained the rank of specialist on 1 April 2011.

2.  On 3 August 2011, nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against the applicant for using "K2" (synthetic cannabis (marijuana) – a Schedule I controlled substance) and marijuana.

3.  On 11 August 2011, he was notified of his pending separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph 14-12c, for misconduct (commission of a serious offense).  The unit commander cited the applicant's drug use.

4.  On 16 August 2011, he consulted with counsel and was advised of the impact of the discharge action.  He also acknowledged that he might encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life if he were issued a general discharge.  He elected not to submit a statement in his behalf.

5.  On 26 August 2011, the separation authority approved the recommendation for discharge and directed the issuance of a general discharge.

6.  On 27 September 2011, he was discharged under honorable conditions (general) under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, for misconduct (drug abuse).  He completed a total of 2 years and 20 days of creditable active service with 26 days of lost time.

7.  On 31 May 2012, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's request for an honorable discharge.

8.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel from active duty.

	a.  Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense.  The regulation states that abuse of illegal drugs is serious misconduct.  The issuance of a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.

	b.  Paragraph 3-7a provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no indication of procedural errors which would have jeopardized his rights.  The type of discharge directed and the reasons were appropriate considering all the facts of the case.

2.  His record of service included one NJP for using "K2" and marijuana.  As a result, his record of service did not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel.

3.  Although a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally appropriate for the authority and reason for his separation, it appears the separation authority considered his overall record of service when he was issued a general discharge.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant an honorable discharge.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130001477



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130001477



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | AR20120000386

    Original file (AR20120000386.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 26 August 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024239

    Original file (AR20110024239.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended: Retention Date: 110721 Discharge Received: Date: 110919 Chapter: 14-12c (2) AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse) RE: SPD: JKK Unit/Location: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 21 July 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c (2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs; in that he used and possessed a...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110024125

    Original file (AR20110024125.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Total Service: 2 Yrs, 7 Mos, 26 Days ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 22 April 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs, for being found guilty by summary court-martial (100226), for wrongfully processing K2 and wrongfully using marijuana, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 5...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120021525

    Original file (AR20120021525.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 10 July 2012 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Misconduct (Drug Abuse), AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2), JKK, RE-4 e. Unit of Assignment: 977th Military Police Company, 97th Military Police Battalion, United States Army Garrison, Fort Riley, KS f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 31 March 2008, 5 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 4 year, 3 months, 10 days h. Total Service: 4 year, 3 months, 10 days i. On 13 June...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001190

    Original file (20140001190.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show in: * Item 18 (Remarks) – "Member Has Completed First Full Term of Service" * Item 24 (Character of Service) – honorable * Item 28 (Narrative Reason for Separation) – deletion of the entry, "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)" 2. The applicant provides copies of the following: * Separation Under Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), paragraph...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006948

    Original file (AR20120006948.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 23 September 2011, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021204

    Original file (20120021204.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 22 June 2011, he was notified by his immediate commander that separation action was being initiated against him under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 14-12c(2) by reason of misconduct - abuse of illegal drugs. The "JKK" SPD code is the correct code for Soldiers separating under Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2), by reason of misconduct - drug abuse. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record confirms...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006356

    Original file (AR20120006356.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 5 August 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for stealing a debit card from a fellow Soldier, stealing a bluetooth headset and a pack of pens from AAFES, possession of the illegal substance K2 x 2, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 13 August 2010, the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001851

    Original file (20130001851.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests his general discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 27 April 1993, the applicant’s company commander initiated action to separate the applicant under the provisions of Army Regulations 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Separations), chapter 14, with a general discharge, for wrongfully using marijuana. There is no evidence the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board within its 15-year statute of limitations for an upgrade of his discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002618

    Original file (20130002618.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to change his narrative reason of separation, "Misconduct – Abuse of Illegal Drugs," to "something more accurate." Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator Codes), in effect at the time, stated that SPD code "JKH" (Misconduct – Commission of a Serious Offense) was the proper SPD code for separations under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12c. As a...