BOARD DATE: 12 September 2013
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130001391
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests an Honorable Discharge Certificate and the following corrections to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 13 January 1997:
a. Add the Army Achievement Medal and the Southwest Asia Service Medal.
b. Include his foreign service in Item 12f (Foreign Service).
2. The applicant states he didn't clearly review his records when he was released from active duty. He is being denied certain benefits because of missing information.
3. The applicant provides:
* Headquarters, 7th Transportation Group, Fort Eustis, VA, Permanent Orders 91-69, dated 16 November 1994
* DA Form 638-1 (Recommendation for Award (For Other Than Valor) of Army Achievement Medal (AAM), Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), and Meritorious Service Medal (MSM)), dated 6 January 1995
* DD Form 214
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. On 14 January 1994, he enlisted in the Regular Army.
3. Headquarters, 7th Transportation Group, Fort Eustis, VA, Permanent Orders 91-69, dated 16 November 1994, show he was assigned to Task Force 11, effective 14 October 1994, for further assignment to Joint Task Force (JTF) -Kuwait, Southwest Asia.
4. The DA Form 638-1 provided by the applicant shows he was recommended by his chain of command for the award of the Army Achievement Medal. The
DA Form 638-1 also shows Headquarters, 6th Transportation Battalion, Permanent Order Number 15-2 awarded him the Army Achievement Medal for the period 13 October to 1 November 1994 while deployed to Saudi Arabia.
5. On 13 January 1997, he was released from active duty. Item 12c (Net Active Service This Period) of his DD Form 214 shows he completed 3 years of active service. Item 12f of his DD Form 214 contains the entry "0000 00 00" (zero years, months, and days). His DD Form 214 does not show he was awarded the Army Achievement Medal or the Southwest Asia Service Medal. There is no entry in Item 18 (Remarks) showing he was deployed to Saudi Arabia.
6. U.S. Army Reserve Personnel Command (now know as U.S. Army Human Resources Command) Orders D-07-135568, dated 31 July 2001, honorably discharged the applicant from the U.S. Army Reserve effective 31 July 2001. There is no evidence of his having been issued an Honorable Discharge Certificate.
7. An email from the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) states he was paid hostile fire/imminent danger pay (HF/IDP) and combat zone tax exclusion (CZTE) from 14 October 1994 to 31 October 1994 for Saudi Arabia.
8. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Southwest Asia Service Medal was awarded to eligible members of the Armed Forces of the United States serving in Southwest Asia and contiguous waters or airspace there over, on or after 2 August 1990 to 30 November 1995. To be eligible, a service member must meet one or more of the following criteria:
* Be attached to or regularly serving for one or more days with an organization participating in ground or shore (military) operations
* Be attached to or regularly serving for one or more days aboard a naval vessel directly supporting military operations
* Be actually participating as a crew member in one or more aerial flights directly supporting military operations in the areas designated above
* Be serving on TDY for 30 consecutive days or
60 nonconsecutive days; these time limitations may be waived for people participating in actual combat operations
9. A bronze service star is authorized for wear with this medal for participation in each credited campaign. Included in the approved campaigns for the Southwest Asia Service Medal is the Cease-Fire Campaign (12 April 1991 to 30 November 1995).
10. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.
a. Foreign service performed during the period covered in Item 12c of the
DD Form 214 will be entered in Item 12f.
b. When an active duty Soldier is deployed with his unit during the period covered by the DD Form 214, an entry will be made in Item 18 to show the name of the country deployed to and the inclusive dates in YYYY/MM/DD format.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. He was assigned to JTF - Kuwait, Southwest Asia and received HF/IDP and CZTE from 14 October to 31 October 1994. Therefore, he is authorized the Southwest Asia Service Medal with one bronze service star.
2. The DA Form 638-1 he provided shows he was recommended for and awarded the Army Achievement Medal. Therefore, this award should be added to his DD Form 214.
3. Based on the dates he received HF/IDP and CZTE provided by DFAS there is sufficient evidence to show he had 18 days of foreign service during his period of active duty. Therefore, item 12f should be corrected to read "0000 00 18."
4. Item 18 should be amended to include the entry: Saudi Arabia 19941014 - 19941031.
5. Based on his discharge orders from the USAR, it would be appropriate to issue him an Honorable Discharge Certificate with an effective date of 31 July 2001.
BOARD VOTE:
____X____ ___X_____ __X___ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:
a. Amending his DD Form 214 with a separation date of 13 January 1997 as follows:
* change Item 12f to read "0000 00 18"
* add the Army Achievement Medal and the Southwest Asia Service Medal
* amend Item 18 to include the entry: "Saudi Arabia 19941014 - 19941031"
b. Issuing him an Honorable Discharge Certificate with an effective date of
31 July 2001.
_______ _ _X______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130001391
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130001391
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028520
The applicant requests, through his Member of Congress: a. reconsideration of his earlier request for correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he served in Southwest Asia from September 1990 to April 1991; b. adding two awards of the Army Achievement Medal that were inadvertently deleted from his DD Form 214 during his original request; and c. as a new issue, award of the Overseas Service Ribbon and the Meritorious Unit Commendation. ...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008619
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his foreign service and the correct pay grade. His record is void of documentation showing he deployed with his unit to Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, during his RA service. He is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this award.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023636
The applicant requests: * award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal * correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show this medal and the Army Good Conduct Medal * correction of his DD Form 214 to show his foreign service in Saudi Arabia in support of Operation Desert Spring, including the country, city, dates, or the operations 2. With respect to his dates of deployment, his TCS orders show he deployed on or about 10 September 2000. The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007449
The applicant requests correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show her foreign service and award of the Southwest Asia Service Medal (SWASM) with one bronze service star. The applicant's request for correction of her record to show her foreign service and award of the SWASM with one bronze service star is supported by the evidence. Based on her service in Kuwait, she is also entitled to correction of her DD Form 214 to show her period of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012229
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * the dates of his foreign service in Saudi Arabia from 21 June to 7 December 1995 * award of the Southwest Asia Service Medal 2. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting from item 12f of his DD...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110003511
Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Southwest Asia Service Medal is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who participated in Operations Desert Shield/Desert Storm in the designated area on or after 2 August 1990 to 30 November 1995. It states item 12 shows the Record of Service. The available evidence shows he served on active duty during a designated period of time and place to qualify for award of the Southwest Asia Service Medal.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016214
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the AFEM is authorized for qualifying service after 1 July 1958 in military operations within a specific geographic area during specified time periods. There is no evidence showing the applicant served in a unit during a period for which the unit was awarded the PUC.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020120
The applicant provides: * Certificate of Appreciation (Somalia) * Certificate of Service (Operation Vigilant Warrior) * Certificate of Achievement (Operation Vigilant Warrior in Southwest Asia) * DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award) and certificate showing award of the Army Commendation Medal CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Certificate, dated 29 March 1996, awarding him the Army Commendation Medal for service from 18 November 1992 to 18 June 1994, by Permanent Orders (PO) Number 92-9,...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018304
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal evidence that he was awarded the Southwest Asia Service Medal or the Kuwait Liberation Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting the entry "0000 00 00" from item 12f of his DD Form 214 and adding the entry "0000 10 26"; b. deleting...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028018
The applicant provided award documents which show he was awarded the Army Achievement Medal (AAM) as follows: a. DA Form 638 (Recommendation for Award), dated 5 June 1996, recommended him for award of the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service for the period 5 June 1992 to 22 July 1996; however, this recommendation was downgraded to an AAM. The evidence of record confirms he was awarded eight AAMs by various orders issuing authorities. As a result, the Board recommends that all...