Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001388
Original file (20130001388.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  12 September 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130001388 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests reinstatement of his Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive.

2.  The applicant states his SLRP requests for the fiscal years 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012 were denied by the National Guard Bureau (NGB) in 2012 because his SLRP Addendum could not be located.  An exception to policy (ETP) request for the SLRP incentive was denied by the NGB because his addendum could not be located.  He remembers signing the addendum at the time of his reenlistment on 15 April 2007, but he was not given a copy of the paperwork.

3.  The applicant provides copies of page one of a DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment) and two ETP requests.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Washington Army National Guard (WAARNG) on 14 February 2002.  He completed required training and was awarded military occupational specialty 63B (Light Wheeled Vehicle Mechanic).  

2.  His record contains and he provides a copy of a DA Form 4836 which shows on 14 April 2007, he executed a 6-year extension of his enlistment.  With this extension, he completed Annex R (Reenlistment/Extension Bonus Addendum – ARNG) for a $15,000.00 extension bonus.

3.  A review of his military records located in the integrated Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS) failed to reveal a copy of an SLRP Addendum for $20,000.00.

4.  On 27 June 2012, he submitted an ETP to the NGB regarding retention of a $20,000.00 SLRP.  He stated that he signed a SLRP/Bonus Agreement on his 15 April 2007 extension date, but he was not given a copy of the document for his files.  Since the unit had since been deactivated none of the unit files could be found.

5.  On 13 July 2012, the WAARNG requested an ETP for the applicant in order for him to retain the $20,000.00 SLRP.  The WAARNG official stated that the applicant's recent payment request was denied by the SLRP Support Team because there was no copy of the applicant's SLRP Addendum in his IPERMS.  The applicant was issued an Information Management and Reporting Center (iMARC) generated control number and signed an SLRP Addendum on 15 April 2007, but he was not given a copy of the document and his unit had since been deactivated and none of the unit's files could be located.  

6.  On 4 October 2012, he was advised that his current condition rendered him medically unfit for continued service in the WAARNG.  He was honorably discharged from the WAARNG on 6 November 2012.

7.  An advisory opinion was obtained from the Personnel Policy Division, NGB, on 13 June 2013, in the processing of this case.  The NGB official recommended approval and stated:

	a.  According to the case documents, the applicant enlisted in the WAARNG on 14 February 2002 and extended his enlistment on 15 April 2007.  He signed an SLRP/Bonus agreement on the date of his extension; however, he was not provided with a copy of the document.  The unit that he was assigned to had since been deactivated.  

   b.  Per the memorandum from the Personnel, Programs, Resources and Manpower Division, dated 9 May 2013, there was no SLRP Addendum on file and a Bonus Control Number (BCN) was not requested until 8 January 2010, almost 3 years after the extension.  The applicant had qualified loans in the amount of $6,201.00 for an annual entitlement of $930.15.  A payment was made to him on 16 April 2010 in the amount of $2,250.00.  The WAARNG submitted an ETP request on behalf of the applicant to the Incentives Branch at the NGB on 13 July 2012.  The ETP was denied on 6 September 2012 because the intent to extend for the SLRP incentive could not be validated.  The WAARNG Incentive Office followed guidance to terminate the contract without recoupment, which was executed on 24 September 2012.
   
   c.  Without a signed SLRP Addendum or other evidence that an offer was made at the time of extension, the ARNG does not have the legal authority to make any additional SLRP payments.  However, the applicant was eligible for the incentive at the time of extension and the BCN was approved.  It would unjust to not honor the commitment represented by the approved BCN.  Recommend that the applicant's records be corrected to indicate that he was offered and accepted the incentive at the time of his extension.  The State concurred with the NGB recommendation.

9.  On 14 June 2013, the applicant was provided a copy of this advisory opinion; however, he did not respond. 

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant executed a 6-year extension in the ARNG on 14 April 2007.  He contends he signed an SLRP Addendum, but was not given a copy of the document.  On 8 January 2010, a BCN was requested for the SLRP Addendum and a payment was made to him on 16 April 2010.  An ETP was made on his behalf to retain the SLRP.  On 6 September 2012, the NGB denied this request and termination of the contract without recoupment was executed on 24 September 2012.

2.  The NGB opined that the applicant was eligible for the SLRP at the time of his extension and the BCN was approved; therefore, it would be unjust to not honor the commitment represented by the approved BCN.  The NGB and the State recommended approval of the applicant's request.  

3.  In view of the foregoing, his records should be correct to show he was offered and accepted the SLRP at the time of his extension on 15 April 2007.  

BOARD VOTE:

__X____  ___X____  ___X____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Army National Guard and Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

* showing the applicant executed an Annex L (SLRP Addendum - ARNG), dated 15 April 2007, and accepted the SLRP incentive on the date he executed the addendum
* authorizing payment of the SLRP in accordance with his contract, to be paid out of ARNG funds



      _______ _ X _______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130001388





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130001388



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013241

    Original file (20130013241.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he was approved by the State Army National Guard (ARNG) to participate in the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP). After a thorough inquiry of his request for assistance on 23 April 2010, it was determined that he was eligible to receive the SLRP, but his SLRP addendum to his enlistment contract, dated 26 September 2007, had not been completed. Further, after a thorough investigation into this matter, the VAARNG IG...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020070

    Original file (20140020070.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an exception to policy (ETP) to retain eligibility for the Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive for which he contracted when he extended his enlistment in the Virginia Army National Guard (VAARNG) on 20 January 2007. The applicant states the National Guard Bureau (NGB) denied his request for an ETP to retain his eligibility for the SLRP incentive due to the facts that: * he accepted an Active Guard Reserve (AGR) position * the SLRP addendum to his extension...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003957

    Original file (20140003957.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Since his original ETS date had not passed and his new 6-year contract had not started, his unit used the same DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment) for both the bonus and the SLRP. The evidence of record shows the applicant reenlisted in the SCARNG on 6 November 2006 for an REB and subsequently completed an addendum on 25 May 2007 for the SLRP in the amount of $20,000 prior to his ETS date of 24 June 2007. After receiving four payments and through no fault of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008719

    Original file (20140008719.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    After having previous enlisted service, the applicant reenlisted in the DEARNG on 17 March 2009 for a period of 6 years. Therefore, her SLRP incentive should have been terminated without recoupment effective 25 May 2011. c. She would have been eligible for an SLRP payment in March 2010 and March 2011, and since the SLRP addendum requires termination without recoupment she is not required to repay these annual payments. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014751

    Original file (20130014751.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests an exception to policy to retain his Reenlistment/ Extension Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) bonus incentive (Control Number S060500051A). In conjunction with this extension, he submitted an SLRP Addendum in good faith that authorized payment of three loans in the amount of $10,369.84 under the SLRP. In the interest of justice, the applicant's record should be corrected to show he signed the SLRP Addendum on the same date of his request for extension (30 March...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001792

    Original file (20140001792.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This official stated: * the applicant completed an SLRP addendum for the $50,000.00 SLRP instead of the $20,000.00 SLRP * the SLRP was increased according to SAMR-HR memorandum, subject: Changes to Reserve SLRP, dated April 2008 * the applicant accepted the incentive offer made by the MNARNG in good faith and had otherwise fulfilled his obligations under the contract as of the date of the request * withholding payment of this incentive would be against equity and good conscience and contrary...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018623

    Original file (20130018623.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    c. The commander states the NGB Incentive Support Team at the ARNG Professional Education Center denied the applicant's OAB payment on 8 September 2011 because he has an active SLRP contract. The ETP to retain the $20,000.00 SLRP was denied based on the following discrepancies: * the applicant's incentive addendum could not be found which violated Department of Defense Instruction 1205.21 * the applicant's DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment) lists Rule A which...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020376

    Original file (20140020376.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: a. The applicant provides copies of the following: * blank (NGB) Form 600-7-5-R-E (Annex L – SLRP Addendum, Army National Guard (ARNG) (valid from 1 March through 30 September 2009) * NGB Form 600-7-6-R-E (Annex R, REB Addendum, ARNG) * four DD Forms 5501 * ETP memorandum * previous Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) Record of Proceedings CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. She had two consecutive body fat standard failures within a 1-year period;...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006005

    Original file (20140006005.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He stated: * he reenlisted in the PRARNG on 6 May 2012 with a reenlistment bonus * his bonus addendum was missing the representative's signature * he met all requirements for bonus incentive at the time he submitted the reenlistment bonus addendum * his supporting documents were turned in on time * he didn't know if his documentation had any administrative errors and the errors were not made intentionally 6. The official denied the request for an ETP based on the following discrepancies and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009094

    Original file (20140009094.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show entitlement to the $20,000.00 Student Loan Repayment Program (SLRP) incentive that he contracted for upon enlistment in the Army National Guard (ARNG). Records show the applicant enlisted in the WYARNG on 15 April 2009 for a period of 6 years in MOS 68W and his enlistment agreement included the SLRP. The Deputy G1 stated that although MOS 68W could not be validated as an authorized critical skill, a review of the applicant's DD Form...