Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001373
Original file (20130001373.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  13 August 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130001373 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB).

2.  The applicant states that the unit received direct and indirect fire during an operation into Cambodia on 19 April 1971 as evidenced by unit records.  He feels he earned the badge due to his combat experience in Vietnam and would like to have it added to his DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 25 August 1969 and he was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman) upon completion of initial entry training.

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in Vietnam from 30 January 1970 to 13 December 1970.

4.  Reassignment orders issued by Headquarters, 101st Airborne Division, dated 13 February 1970, show he was being reassigned from Detachment 1, 101st Administration Company (Airmobile), to Company A, 3d Battalion, 506th Infantry, effective 17 February 1970.

5.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 shows he was assigned as a cannoneer to Battery C, 5th Battalion, 22d Artillery, in Vietnam.  However, his records contain a memorandum from the Assistant Adjutant, Headquarters, 5th Battalion, 22d Artillery, dated 20 April 1970, stating the applicant was not a member of that command and the headquarters had no record of him.

6.  The CIB is not included in the list of awards in item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20.

7.  His military records are void of orders or any other document that indicate he was recommended for or awarded the CIB.

8.  He was honorably released from active duty on 24 August 1971.  The CIB is not listed as an authorized award on his DD Form 214.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states there are basically three requirements for award of the CIB.  The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show award of the CIB has been carefully considered.

2.  The evidence shows he was awarded an infantry MOS and served with an infantry unit in Vietnam.  However, it does not sufficiently show he engaged in active ground combat while assigned to this unit.

3.  His military records are void of orders or any other documents that indicate he was recommended for or awarded the CIB.  There is simply insufficient evidence to corroborate his contention that his unit received direct and indirect fire while conducting military operations and that he was present during such operations.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for adding award of the CIB to his DD Form 214 in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ___x____  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130001373



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130001373



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022275

    Original file (20130022275.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR20120010441, on 11 December 2012. The applicant provides a military pay voucher, dated 16 July 1970, which shows he was assigned to Company E, 1st Battalion, 506th Infantry. The evidence of record supports the applicant's contention he was a member of the 1st Battalion, not the 5th...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011052

    Original file (20120011052.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, his military service records do not contain any orders awarding him the CIB. Additionally, Appendix V of U.S. Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 states that during the Vietnam era the CIB was awarded only to enlisted individuals who held and served in MOS 11B, 11C, 11D, 11F, 11G, or 11H. However, there is no evidence he was ever awarded an infantry MOS which is a requirement for the award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110000549

    Original file (20110000549.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 June 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110000549 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The witness stated his records showed award of the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device, the Presidential Unit Citation, Valorous Unit Award, and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. However, the available evidence does not support the applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070002242C071029

    Original file (20070002242C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides for award of the CIB to a Soldier who is an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, who is assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and who actively participates in such ground combat. There is no evidence of record to show the applicant was awarded the CIB. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief and to excuse failure...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140016508

    Original file (20140016508.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). Additionally, his military service records do not contain any orders awarding him the CIB. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Although the evidence of record shows he served in an infantry MOS with an infantry unit of regimental size, there is insufficient evidence to show he was personally present and engaged in active...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010517

    Original file (20100010517.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The Soldier must be an infantryman satisfactorily performing infantry duties, he must be assigned to an infantry unit during such time as the unit is engaged in active ground combat, and he must actively participate in such ground combat. In the absence of official orders or other documentary evidence such as...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100028075

    Original file (20100028075.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * his rank/grade as a sergeant (SGT)/E-5 * award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) 2. On 8 June 1971, Headquarters, 4th Infantry Division (Mechanized) published Special Orders Number 159 ordering his release from active duty effective 11 June 1971. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130006903

    Original file (20130006903.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show this award. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows in: * item 29 (Qualification in Arms), he qualified: * Marksman with the M-14 Rifle and .45 caliber pistol * Second Class Gunner (now called Marksman) with the 81 millimeter mortar * item 38 (Record of Assignments), he was assigned to duty in Vietnam...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100107C070208

    Original file (2004100107C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Counsel requests that the applicant's request for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) be reconsidered. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in Docket Number AR2003088806 on 11 September 2003. On 11 September 2003, in ABCMR Docket Number AR2003088806, the Board denied the applicant's request for the CIB due to insufficient evidence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012874

    Original file (20060012874.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Paragraph 8-6 of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides for award of the CIB. The applicant's records show he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the CIB; b. awarding the applicant the Good Conduct Medal (First Award) for the qualifying period of 1 June 1971 through 31 May 1973; c. awarding the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit...