Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000444
Original file (20130000444.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  25 July 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130000444


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM).

2.  The applicant states his award of the BSM does not appear on his DD Form 214 or his DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214).

3.  The applicant provides his BSM Citation.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 25 August 1967.  He completed initial entry training and was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman).

3.  Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in Vietnam from on or about 8 February 1968 through 3 February 1969.

4.  Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of his DA Form 20 shows he was assigned to Company C, 2nd Battalion, 1st Infantry Regiment, 196th Infantry Brigade (Light), during his service in Vietnam.

5.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 shows he was awarded or authorized the:

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal
* Combat Infantryman Badge
* Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960)

6.  Item 41 contains several separate, hand-written pencil entries as follows:

* "BS" – 9 December 1968
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16)
* Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machine Gun Bar (M-60)
* Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16)
* Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14)

7.  On 22 August 1969, he was honorably released from active duty in the rank/pay grade of sergeant/E-5.  His DD Form 214 shows he completed 1 year, 11 months, and 28 days of net service during this period including 11 months and 26 days of foreign service in Vietnam.

8.  His DD Form 214 does not show he was awarded the BSM.

9.  His record is void of orders showing he was awarded the BSM.

10.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973, maintained by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command Military Awards Branch, failed to reveal any orders showing he was awarded the BSM.

11.  On 18 May 2012, he was issued a DD Form 215 deleting award of the Vietnam Service Medal and adding the following awards:

* Purple Heart
* Army Good Conduct Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars
* Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation

12.  The applicant provides a BSM Citation that shows he was cited for award of the BSM for meritorious service in connection with military operations against a hostile force in the Republic of Vietnam during the period February 1968 through February 1969.  He did not provide orders awarding him this medal.

13.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the BSM is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service, not involving participation in aerial flight, in connection with military operations against an armed enemy or while engaged in military operations involving conflict with an opposing armed force in which the United States is not a belligerent party.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for correction of his DD Form 214 to show award of the BSM was carefully considered.

2.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required for personal decorations (which include the BSM).

3.  Notwithstanding the pencil entry in item 41 of his DA Form 20, there are no other record entries and no orders or documents on file that indicate he was ever awarded the BSM by proper authority.  Typically, pencil entries are non-permanent entries, leaving room for doubt as to whether the award was ultimately approved in this case.  The BSM Citation he submitted is noted; however, without orders, there is no definitive proof showing he was awarded the BSM.

4.  The applicant's sincerity is not in question.  However, in the absence of official orders, there is insufficient evidence to correct his records to show award of the BSM.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _____________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100015543



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130000444



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010343

    Original file (20140010343.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He requests his awards and training be included on his DD Form 214. The applicant's DA Form 20, item 41 (Awards and Decorations) lists the following awards: * NDSM * VSM * CIB * VCM * BSM * PH * ARCOM * BSM (Second Award) * ARCOM (Second Award) * Air Medal * PH (Second Award) * GCM * Expert Rifle M-14 7. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 for the period ending 22 November 1970 to: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027309

    Original file (20100027309.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 28 October 1966. The applicant's DA Form 20 shows an entry for the Purple Heart, indicating he was authorized the award and that his entitlement to the award could be substantiated. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Purple Heart for wounds received on 4 September 1968; b. deleting "MKM (M-14)" and "VSM" from item 24 of his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110014411

    Original file (20110014411.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record also shows the applicant earned three marksmanship badges that were not listed in item 24 of his DD Form 214. However, his unit was never cited for award of the MUC at any time during its service in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from item 24 of his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal and b. adding to item 24 of his DD Form 214 the: * Vietnam Service Medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080013132

    Original file (20080013132.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected to show all awards to which he is entitled. The evidence of record includes official orders awarding the applicant the PH and the BSM and these awards were omitted from Item 24 of his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010983

    Original file (20120010983.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of an earlier Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) decision pertaining to his request for correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). Item 31 (Foreign Service) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the Republic of Vietnam from 4 December 1967 to 6 November 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012834

    Original file (20080012834.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record confirms that the applicant was awarded the PH and the BSM for three separate periods, and that these awards were announced in official orders. As a result, Item 24 of the applicant’s separation document should be corrected to add the PH and to show his entitlement to the BSM with 2nd OLC to denote three awards instead of two awards of the BSM. As a result, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the AGCM, for his qualifying period of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090011335

    Original file (20090011335.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 December 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090011335 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's OMPF is void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever wounded in action or recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving in the RVN. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the AGCM for his qualifying period of honorable active duty service from 27 May 1966 through 25 December 1968, and to add this award to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080015065

    Original file (20080015065.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 8 January 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080015065 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, that his separation document (DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) dated 7 May 1970, be corrected to add the Bronze Star Medal (BSM), Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) with 4 bronze service stars, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal (RVNCM) with Device (1960), Meritorious Unit Commendation (MUC) with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021146

    Original file (20120021146.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provides: * DD Form 214 * page from his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) * two photographs * memorandum, subject: Authorization for Individual Foreign Award, dated 9 June 1970 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. In light of his overall record of service, it would be appropriate to award him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) based on completion of a qualifying period of active Federal service from 4 January 1968 to 20 October 1969 and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110002654

    Original file (20110002654.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His OMPF is void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty. 4 In addition, based on his service and campaign participation in the RVN, he is also entitled to the 3 bronze service stars with his already-awarded VSM, RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation and none of these awards are currently listed on his DD Form 214. As a...