Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000392
Original file (20130000392.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		
		BOARD DATE:	  23 July 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130000392 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of item 2 (Service Number) of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his service number as "RA XX XXX 806" instead of "RA XX XXX 770."

2.  The applicant states the DD Form 214 he received has a line drawn through the service number and the handwritten entry "806' written above "770."  He used the service number ending with the numbers "770" throughout his 3 years of military service.  His dog tags contain this service number.  If for some reason his service number should end with "806," he would like his DD Form 214 corrected to show that.  He would like to be issued a veterans' identification card with the correct service number.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 23 November 1965.  Item 2 (Service Number) of his DD Form 4 (Enlistment Record – Armed Forces of the United States) shows the entry "RA XX XXX 770." 
This entry was later crossed out and a handwritten entry is placed above it showing the number as "RA XX XXX 806."

3.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) which was created upon his entry on active duty shows his service number as "RA XX XXX 770."

4.  On 30 December 1965, an AGPZ Form 77 (Duplication and Determination Slip) was submitted wherein a discrepancy in his service number is indicated.  It appears that his service number was a duplicate.

5.  On 17 January 1966 in a memorandum to the commanding officer of the U.S. Army Recruiting Station (that enlisted the applicant), an official at the U.S. Army Personnel Services Support Center, Fort Benjamin Harrison, IN, indicated the official records show the service number "RA XX XXX 770" was assigned to two individuals, one of whom was the applicant.  The official requested verification so that corrective action could be taken.

6.  On 28 January 1966, an official at the Pittsburgh Armed Forces Examining and Entrance Station (AFEES) corresponded with the U.S. Army Personnel Service Support Center, Fort Benjamin Harrison, and requested that several individuals' service numbers be corrected, among them the applicant's service number from "RA XX XXX 770" to "RA XX XXX 806."

7.  On 3 March 1966, the U.S. Army Personnel Services Support Center, Fort Benjamin Harrison, issued a DD Form 1343 (Notification of Change in Service Member's Official Records) directing amendment of the applicant's service number from "RA XX XXX 770" to "RA XX XXX 806" based on duplication and the AGPZ Form 77.

8.  On 22 November 1968, the applicant was honorably released from active duty.  Item 2 of his DD Form 214 shows the entry "RA XX XXX 770."  However, a line is drawn through the last three digits and an entry showing "806" is handwritten above it.

9.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  The regulation directs that the purpose of the separation document is to provide the individual with documentary evidence of his or her military service.  It is important that information entered on the form should be complete and accurate.  The version in effect at the time of his discharge stated that item 2 shows the service number; Regular Army Soldiers are identified as "RA."

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Regular Army Soldiers were identified with the prefix "RA" to indicate their affiliation with the Regular Army.  When the applicant enlisted in the RA, he and another Soldier were apparently assigned the same service number.  Officials at the U.S. Army Personnel Services Support Center, Fort Benjamin Harrison, detected the error and requested verification from the Pittsburgh AFEES.

2.  Officials at AFEES confirmed the administrative error.  Accordingly, the U.S. Army Personnel Services Support Center, Fort Benjamin Harrison, issued a notification of the change in the service record.

3.  It appears that when an official prepared the applicant's DD Form 214, the official entered his service number as shown on his DA Form 20.  It also appears that the same official noticed the notification of the change in service number and instead of preparing a new DD Form 214, the official simply crossed out the erroneous entry.

4.  The applicant's correct service number is "RA XX XXX 806."  He should be entitled to the issuance of a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) to show his correct service number.

BOARD VOTE:

__x___  __x______  ____x____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the existing entry from item 2 of his DD Form 214 and replacing it with the entry "RA XX XXX 806."



      ___________x______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130000392



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130000392



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130000073

    Original file (20130000073.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011931

    Original file (20100011931.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that his DD Form 214 for the period ending 27 October 1971 incorrectly reflects the 8th digit of his SSN as “5” instead of “3.” 3. The commander verified that the applicant’s SSN was “xxx-xx-xx3x.” Accordingly, the applicant’s SSN on his reenlistment contract, dated 26 September 1969, was corrected to reflect his SSN as “xxx-xx-xx3x.” 7. __________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006799

    Original file (20110006799.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Both orders show the same SSN as shown on his Social Security card, DD Form 398, and DA Form 20. Therefore, the SSN on his DD Form 214 should be corrected accordingly. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting from item 3 of his DD Form 214 the current entry and replacing it with the social security number as shown on his Social Security card and other official orders and documents referenced in these...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021900

    Original file (20120021900.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In connection with the applicant's enlistment in the Regular Army (RA) he completed a DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History) wherein he listed his SSN as "xxx-xx-9665." Except for his DA Form 20 that listed his SSN "xxx-xx-x9xx," he consistently used the same SSN throughout his military service as that shown on his Social Security card. Therefore, based on the evidence of record and the evidence provided by the applicant, it would be appropriate at this time to correct his DD Form 214...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024549

    Original file (20110024549.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his social security number (SSN) as "XXX-XX-8934." Item 1 (Last Name – First Name – Middle Name) of his DD Form 47 (Record of Induction) shows "no SSN given."

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100023790

    Original file (20100023790.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that a DA Form 2627 (Summarized Record of Proceedings under Article 15, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ)) pertaining to another individual be removed from his record. He states the DA Form 2627 belongs to another individual with the same name, but with a different social security number (SSN) and service number. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by removing from his OMPF the DA...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007300

    Original file (20080007300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 4, dated 3 July 1974 shows the applicant’s SSN as xxx-xx-xx92. On the various documents completed by the applicant at the time of his initial entry onto active duty, he listed his SSN as xxx-xx-xx92. __________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019355

    Original file (20080019355.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of duplicate, incorrect orders for award of the Good Conduct Medal (4th Award) from his official military personnel file (OMPF). On 16 January 2008, the applicant petitioned the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to remove the incorrect Army Good Conduct Medal order from his file. The evidence of record shows that the applicant's OMPF contains two incorrect orders: Orders 058-1, 1st Armored Division Support Command, Personnel Services...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120006476

    Original file (20120006476.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) to show his social security number (SNN) as "XXX-XX-6227" vice "9XX-XX-4329." The evidence of record shows the applicant listed his SSN as "XXX-XX-6227" upon his enlistment in the RA. It also appears that the typed TIN was lined through when he received his social security card and the SSN "XXX-XX-6227" was recorded on his DD Form 4.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010411

    Original file (20100010411.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although the letter awarding the applicant the Purple Heart contained an incorrect ASN, the Western Union telegram and the message released by the Commanding General, U.S. Army Vietnam, both identified the applicant with the correct ASN, thereby verifying the applicant was wounded and awarded the Purple Heart. The applicant's military personnel records show he participated in one campaign during his service in Vietnam. The Board also recommends that his DD Form 214 be corrected by: a....