Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022953
Original file (20120022953.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  11 July 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120022953 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart.

2.  The applicant states:

* he was on guard duty near the Long Binh Ammunition Depot when the Viet Cong blew it up
* the explosion was extremely loud and looked like an atomic bomb
* he was knocked out of a bunker and experienced a concussion for a couple of minutes
* he only remembers being in the air and then crawling around the ground outside the bunker
* he could not hear for over a week, his ears popped afterwards, and he started experiencing buzzing in his head and began having migraine headaches
* he has flashbacks and panic attacks
* the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has granted him a 100 percent disability rating
* he never complained at the time because he was trained to be a tough Soldier and he thought he was doing the right thing
* he has suffered for 46 years and he is not getting any younger and award of the PH would help to validate his service to his country
* the criteria for award of the PH states "concussions due to enemy explosions" and does not indicate what year



3.  The applicant provides:

* 2-page webpage extract
* DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge)
* VA rating decision, dated 11 February 2009

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 12 July 1965.  He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 71C (Stenographer).  

3.  He served in Vietnam from 20 June 1966 to on or about 5 June 1967.  While in Vietnam, he was assigned to the 24th Evacuation Hospital, 68th Medical Group and to the 44th Medical Brigade.

4.  He was honorably released from active duty on 6 June 1967.  His DD Form 214 does not show award of the Purple Heart. 

5.  There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart.  Nothing in the typical sources show he was wounded/injured as a result of hostile action:

	a.  Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show a combat wound or injury.  Army Regulation 600-200 (Enlisted Personnel Management System), chapter 9, stated a brief description of wounds or injuries (including injury from gas) requiring medical treatment received through hostile or enemy action, including those requiring hospitalization would be entered in item 40 of the DA Form 20.  This regulation further stated that the date the wound or injury occurred would also be placed in item 40.
	b.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System maintained by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, which is an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973, failed to reveal any orders for the Purple Heart pertaining to him.

	c.  His name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty listing.  This is a microfiche listing of Vietnam Era Casualties that is used to verify entitlement to the Purple Heart. 

	d.  His medical records are not available for review and he does not provide copies of them.

6.  The applicant provides a 2-page webpage extract on the Long Binh Ammunition Dump explosion on 29 October 1966.  The 2-page extract contains two personal accounts of events occurring during the explosion.  The applicant also provides a copy of his VA rating decision which shows he was granted a 100 percent disability rating.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against and enemy or as a result of hostile action.  Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The criteria for the Purple Heart requires the submission of substantiating evidence to verify that the injury/wound was the result of hostile action, the injury/wound must have required medical treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.

2.  The applicant's service record is void of any evidence that shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action.  

3.  Regrettably, in the absence of documentation that conclusively shows he was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action and treated for those wounds, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for awarding him the Purple Heart.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120022953



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120022953



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017557

    Original file (20130017557.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    b. DA Form 8-275-3, dated 27 June 1967, shows he sustained a perforating wound to the cornea of his right eye when he was struck in the eye by a piece of bamboo at the 90th Replacement Battalion, Long Binh, Vietnam. There is no evidence of record that shows he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart. In this case, the evidence of record shows the applicant was clearing vegetation around a perimeter in Vietnam when he sustained an eye...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014545

    Original file (20080014545.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 18 December 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080014545 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Although the applicant’s name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty Roster, there is sufficient documentary evidence in this case to show the applicant sustained injury to his ears and a loss of hearing as a result of hostile action. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000591

    Original file (20140000591.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. In this case, the evidence of record shows the applicant was involved in an ammunition dump explosion when he appears to have sustained his low back injury and later received treatment for this injury. Notwithstanding his sincerity, in the absence of additional official documentary evidence to corroborate the events...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007592

    Original file (20080007592.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There are service medical records showing the applicant was medically evacuated on 5 November 1968 for treatment of a compression fracture of the T12 sustained as a result of an accident when a bunker collapsed on the applicant. The evidence in his service medical records clearly shows that he sustained a back injury when a bunker collapsed. In the absence of evidence that the applicant was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action and treated for those wounds, there is insufficient...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011363

    Original file (20100011363.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart. Colonel (COL) J____ B. P____'s strict interpretation of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) which, in effect, denied him award of the Purple Heart by stating he was not injured as a result of enemy action, but as a result of running into the door during the rocket attack on 26 May 1968, is not true. In the absence of any other corroborating evidence of record which shows he was wounded or injured as a result of hostile action, there...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019617

    Original file (20080019617.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 30 APRIL 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080019617 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. There are no general orders in the applicant’s service personnel records that show he was awarded the Purple Heart. There also is no evidence in his service personnel records that shows that he was treated for wounds as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023324

    Original file (20110023324.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart and correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show it. Nothing in five typical documents show he was injured or wounded as a result of hostile action or that he was awarded the Purple Heart: * Item 40 (Wounds) of his DA Form 20 does not show a combat wound or injury * His records do not contain general orders authorizing him award of the Purple Heart * His name is not shown on the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100007331

    Original file (20100007331.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). A copy of a DA Form 2658, dated on various dates through his military service, shows he received medical services at the 4th Battalion, 503rd Infantry aid station on 29 August 1969. b. His record is void of any orders that show he was awarded the Purple Heart, his name is not shown on the Vietnam casualty roster, his DA Form 20 does not indicate any combat wounds, his available medical records do...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002077883C070215

    Original file (2002077883C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The Board considered the following evidence: The applicant submits a second statement in which it is said that the writer witnessed the applicant injure his back while carrying ammunition while their unit was battling North Vietnamese troops.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075744C070403

    Original file (2002075744C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records that he was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. There is no evidence in the applicant's service personnel records which shows that he was wounded or treated for wounds sustained as a result of hostile action in Vietnam.