Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022613
Original file (20120022613.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		
		BOARD DATE:	  27 June 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120022613 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his date of birth as 10 September 1966 and his last duty assignment as Troop B, 1st Squadron, 17th Air Cavalry.

2.  The applicant states he was born in September and was assigned to the Air Cavalry which was an aviation unit.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States), dated 13 October 1983, shows his date of birth as 10 September 1966.  He enlisted for 6 years in the U.S. Army Reserve for a delayed enlistment in the Regular Army on 22 August 1984.

3.  On 22 August, 1984, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army.  After completing his initial training at Fort Benning, Georgia, he was assigned to Fort Bragg, North Carolina.

4.  The applicant's DA Form 2A (Personnel Qualification Record – Part I) prepared on 11 October 1985 records his date of birth as 10 September 1966.

5.  The applicant's DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record – Part II) lists his specific units of assignment at Fort Bragg as:

* 10 January 1985 to 4 February 1987 – Troop B, 1st Squadron, 17th Air Cavalry
* 5 to 9 February 1987 – Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 1st Battalion, 504th Parachute Infantry Regiment
* 10 February to 22 June 1987 – Company A, 1st Battalion, 504th Parachute Infantry Regiment

6.  On 21 June 1987, the applicant was released from active duty.  His DD Form 214 shows:

* item 5 (Date of Birth) – 10 October 1966
* item 7 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command) – Company A, 1st Battalion, 504th Parachute Infantry Regiment

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, provided detailed instructions for completing separation documents, including the DD Form 214.  It provided that the DD Form 214 was a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty.  The DD Form 214 provided a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.  The instructions required entry of the Soldier's date of birth in item 5 and his last duty assignment in item 7.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his date of birth as 10 September 1966 and his last duty assignment as Troop B, 1st Squadron, 17th Air Cavalry.

2.  The available evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant entered the Regular Army and served under the date of birth of 10 September 1966.  Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this date of birth.

3.  The available records clearly show the applicant's last unit of assignment was Company A, 1st Battalion, 504th Parachute Infantry Regiment.  This is the unit shown on his DD Form 214.  Therefore, this portion of his request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

__x___  ___x_____  ___x_____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 to show his date of birth as 10 September 1966.

2.  The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to changing the last duty assignment shown on his DD Form 214.



      ___________x______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120022613



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120022613



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012380

    Original file (20060012380.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. There are no orders in his military records which awarded him the Combat Infantryman Badge, and there is no evidence in his military records that he served in active ground combat while assigned in Vietnam. Although the applicant contends that he was drafted into the Army of the United States, evidence of record clearly shows that he voluntarily enlisted in the Regular Army on 29...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022410

    Original file (20130022410 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show: * his last duty assignment and major command as Troop D, 7th Squadron, 1st Cavalry Regiment, U.S. Army Vietnam * he was awarded the – * Purple Heart * Vietnam Service Medal with four bronze service stars * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation 2. His records also contain a Standard Form 93 (Report of Medical History), dated 10 September...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011639

    Original file (20110011639.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states the 101st Airborne Division was awarded the PUC during World War II and that it was passed on to him because he was in the unit. Evidence shows his unit was cited for award of the PUC from 2 June to 20 June 1966. ____________X__________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021550

    Original file (20120021550.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states he does not understand why the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) denied award of the "Army of Occupation Medal (Japan)." His DD Form 214 shows in: * Item 27 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) - Korean Service Medal with 1 silver service star and 2 bronze service stars and United Nations Service Medal * Item 28 (Most Significant Duty Assignment) - Headquarters Company, 2nd Battalion, 7th...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018215

    Original file (20070018215.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 March 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070018215 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant requests, in effect, that item 12 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command), of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), be corrected. The applicant states, in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017196

    Original file (20140017196.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The FSM's military service records for the period of service under review are not available to the Board for review. However, the DD Form 214 and award orders provided by the applicant offer sufficient evidence for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the FSM's DD Form 214 to show his correct unit of assignment.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013980

    Original file (20140013980.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he wrote to the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC) Awards and Decorations Branch to request a replacement Combat Infantryman Badge * HRC removed the Combat Infantryman Badge from his DD Form 214 claiming he was not entitled to the award because he did not have an infantry military occupational specialty (MOS) * HRC must not be aware that U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Awards and Decorations), appendix V, stated MOS 11D (Armor Intelligence Specialist) was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090020051

    Original file (20090020051.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of a qualifying period of Federal military service and correction of his records to show this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013549

    Original file (20140013549.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, there is no evidence of record and he did not submit any substantive evidence that shows he was awarded the CIB or that he served in active ground combat while assigned to this unit. Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to correct his military service records to show he was awarded the CIB. ___________x____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016076

    Original file (20100016076.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's DD Form 214, effective 28 February 1972, shows in Item 12 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command): HHT 1/10 Cavalry, Sixth U.S. Army. The available evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant was assigned to the 12th Cavalry Regiment while in the Republic of Vietnam. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.