Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022356
Original file (20120022356.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  23 July 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120022356 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests:

	a.  correction of item 18 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show his period of honorable service from 19960213 to 20010808; and

	b.  issuance of a new DD Form 214 vice a DD Form 215 (Correction to
DD Form 214).

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  his request is in accordance with Department of Defense instructions and statutes; and

	b.  since this information reflects a character of service, he is requesting a 
DD Form 214 vice a DD Form 215.

3.  The applicant provides:

* his DD Form 214
* an extract of Department of Defense Instruction (DoDI) 1336.01, Enclosure 3, dated August 2009
* an extract of Title 32, Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), paragraph 45.3 (Policy and Procedures)


CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 13 March 1996 for a period of
3 years.

2.  He reenlisted on:

* 26 February 1999 for 2 years
* 2 May 2000 for 2 years
* 9 August 2001 for 6 years

3.  General Court-Martial Order Number 45, published by Headquarters, Fort Hood, TX, dated 29 June 2007, shows he appeared before a General Court-Martial (GCM) on 14 September 2006.  Contrary to the applicant's plea, he was found guilty of:

	a.  one specification of violating Article 125, Uniform Code for Military Justice (UCMJ) by between on or about 10 April 2001 and 30 June 2003, committing sodomy with a child under the age of 12 years by force and without consent.

	b.  two specifications of violating Article 134, UCMJ by:

		(1)  between on or about 1 July 2004 and 31 July 2004, committing an indecent act upon a female under the age of 16 years by touching her breasts and vagina; and

		(2)  between on or about 10 April 2001 and 30 June 2003, taking indecent liberties with a female under the age of 16 years by showing her pornographic images.

4.  On 31 May 2010, he was dishonorably discharged as a result of court-martial.  He completed 11 years, 6 months, and 1 day of creditable active service.

5.  Item 18 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 contains the entry "IMMEDIATE REENLISTMENTS THIS PERIOD -- 19960313-1999025, 1999026-20000501, 20000502-20010808, 20010809-20100531."

6.  He submitted an extract of:

	a.  DoDI 1336.01, Enclosure 3, Paragraph j, that states the date entered in Block 12a shall be the date of enlistment for the earliest period of continuous 


active service for which a DD Form 214 was not previously issued.  For Service members who have previously reenlisted without being issued a DD Form 214, 
and who are being separated with any discharge characterization except "Honorable," the following statement shall appear as the first entry in Block 18 on the DD Form 214: "CONTINUOUS HONORABLE ACTIVE SERVICE FROM (applicable date) UNTIL (applicable date)."

		(1)  The "from" date shall be the date of initial entry into active duty, or the first day of service for which a DD Form 214 was not previously issued, as applicable.

		(2)  The "until" date shall be the date before commencement of the current enlistment.

	b.  Title 32, CFR, paragraph 45.3 (3), states whenever a DD Form 214 is administratively issued or reissued, an appropriate entry stating that fact and the date of such action will be made in Block 18, Remarks, of the DD Form 214 unless the appellate authority, Executive Order, or Secretarial directive specifies otherwise.

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army.  It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  The regulation states a DD Form 214 will not be prepared for enlisted Soldiers discharged for immediate reenlistment in the Regular Army.  This regulation states in:

	a.  Paragraph 2-4h(18)(c), for enlisted Soldiers with more than one enlistment period during the time covered by this DD Form 214, enter "IMMEDIATE REENLISTMENTS THIS PERIOD" (specify dates).  However, for Soldiers who have previously reenlisted without being issued a DD Form 214 and are separated with any characterization of service except "Honorable," enter "Continuous Honorable Active Service From" (first day of service which DD Form 214 was not issued) Until (date before commencement of current enlistment). Then, enter the specific periods of reenlistments as prescribed above.

	b.  Paragraph 2-7 states once a DD Form 214 has been issued, do not reissue except for the following reasons:

		(1)  when directed by proper appellate authority, Executive Order, or by the Secretary of the Army;

		(2)  when it is determined that the original DD Form 214 cannot be properly corrected by issuance of a DD Form 215 or if the correction would require issuance of more than two DD Forms 215;

		(3)  when two DD Forms 215 have been issued and an additional correction is required;

		(4)  when a DD Form 214 is administratively issued or reissued, enter that fact and the date of such action on the DD Form 214, item 18 - Remarks; unless the appellate authority, executive order, or Secretarial directive specifies otherwise; and

		(5)  do not issue a DD Form 214 to replace record copies or DD Forms 214 lost by Soldiers.  If no DD Form 214 is available, issue a statement of service or transcript of military record.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 13 March 1996.  He subsequently reenlisted on 26 February 1999, 2 May 2000, and 9 August 2001.

2.  A general court-martial found the applicant guilty of offenses committed between 10 April 2001 and 31 July 2004.  In addition, the evidence of record shows he had more than one enlistment period during the time covered by his DD Form 214 and that he was separated with a dishonorable discharge.  As a result, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show his period of honorable active service during the period from 13 March 1996 through 1 May 2000.

3.  Regarding issuing a new DD Form 214, regulatory guidance provides the criteria for the preparation of the DD Form 214.  There are provisions in place to record periods of honorable service for enlisted Soldiers with more than one enlistment period during the time covered by the DD Form 214.  Therefore, there is no basis for granting this portion of the applicant's request.

4.  In view of the foregoing, his DD Form 214 should be corrected as recommended below.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___X____  __X____  ___X____  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

	a.  deleting from item 18 of his DD Form 214 the entry, "IMMEDIATE REENLISTMENTS THIS PERIOD -- 19960313-19990225, 19990226-20000501, 20000502-20010808, 20010809-201000531," and

	b.  adding to item 18 of his DD Form 214 the entry "CONTINUOUS HONORABLE ACTIVE SERVICE FROM 19960313-20000501//IMMEDIATE REENLISTMENTS THIS PERIOD 19960313-19990225, 19990226-20000501, 20000502-20010808, 20010809-201000531."

2.  The Board further determined the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to:

	a.  showing he had continuous honorable active service during the period 20000502-20010808; and 

	b.  issuing him a new DD Form 214 vice a DD Form 215 based on the corrective action taken.



      __________X___________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120022356



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120022356



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002582

    Original file (20140002582.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request for issuance of a new DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) instead of a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214). On 23 July 2013, the ABCMR partially granted his previous request and issued him a DD Form 215 changing item 18 of his DD Form 214 to show "CONTINUOUS HONORABLE ACTIVE SERVICE FROM 19960331 [sic]-20000501//IMMEDIATE REENLISTMENTS THIS PERIOD 19960313-19990225, 19990226-20000501,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03112

    Original file (BC-2011-03112.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03112 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be issued DD Forms 256, Honorable Discharge Certificates, for all periods of his enlistments that resulted in discharges for the purpose of immediate reenlistments. In this respect, while we note the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018484

    Original file (20140018484.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * he was awarded the Army Good Conduct Medal on 20 February 1987 * his completion of the RECONDO course was never added to his record * based upon an earlier application to the Board, he was told he had two periods of service, one honorable and the other under other than honorable conditions * if he had two separate blocks of service, he would like to have a DD Form 214 for that first honorable period 3. The applicant requests his DD Form 214 be corrected to show his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012602

    Original file (20090012602.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 25 September 1970; a DD Form 215, dated 19 July 1990; and three pages of his DA Form 20 in support of his request. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. However, the evidence of record does not support the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003910

    Original file (20090003910.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides a copy of her DD Form 214 for the period ending 29 February 1984, a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), National Archives (NA) Form 13038 (Certificate of Military Service), DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), three DD Forms 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Contracts), two military pay vouchers, one Leave and Earnings Statement, and a letter from the Board directing a change to her date of rank. This DD...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021029

    Original file (20140021029.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of item 7a (Place of Entry on Active Duty) (PLEAD) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to read "Fort Bliss, Texas." Item 7a of the DD Form 214 shows the place of entry onto active duty. The applicant contends his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he entered active duty from Fort Bliss, Texas.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009340

    Original file (20090009340.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The record does not show the applicant completed any further active duty service beyond the 1 month and 2 days currently reflected on his DD Form 214 which is contained in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). However, the DD Form 214 contained in his records is the Service -2 copy of the original document issued to the applicant at the time of his separation on 24 August 1981. In additionally, had the applicant lost his DD Form 214 and requested a replacement he would have received...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010891

    Original file (20100010891.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The DD Form 214 which was issued at the time of his 1971 discharged contained multiple errors but did indicate the applicant was entitled to both the Vietnam Service Medal and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). c. Appendix B (The U.S. Army in Thailand During the Vietnam Conflict) of Vietnam Order of Battle (A Complete Illustrated Reference to U.S. Army Combat and Support Forces in Vietnam 1961-1973) authored by Captain Shelby L. Stanton, notes that the 57th...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000073

    Original file (20090000073.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests Item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 18 March 2004 be corrected to include the Iraq Campaign Service Medal with two bronze service stars. He states a previous Army Board for Correction of Military Records decision determined that the evidence he presented was sufficient to show he was authorized the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005115

    Original file (20130005115.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, a new DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) or DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214) to show he was retired due to permanent disability on 13 July 1987. Under this change, item 12a shows the beginning date of the enlistment period for which a DD Form 214 was not issued under the provisions of paragraph 1-4b(5) (Enlisted members discharged for immediate reenlistment) of this regulation. Although his 1985 DD Form 214 properly...