Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022344
Original file (20120022344.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF: 

		BOARD DATE: 11 July 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120022344 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the date he was placed on the retired list be changed from 17 May 2008 to 17 May 2007.

2.  The applicant states that he should be advanced on the retired list effective 
16 May 2007, the date shown in item 6 (Reserve Obligation Termination Date) of his 31 May 1994 DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).  The incorrect date causes one year of lost retirement pay. 

3.  The applicant provides copies of:

* his 31 May 1994 DD Form 214
* his 26 January 1994 retirement orders
* his 22 August 2007 letter to the Army Review Boards Agency (ARBA), St Louis, Missouri  
* a 29 November 2007 letter from the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant's record shows he:

	a.  enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) on 29 June 1973.  He was discharged on 19 December 1977 for the purpose of immediate reenlistment.
 
	b.  reenlisted in the RA on 20 December 1977, and served until he was discharged on 17 December 1982, as a staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6.  His DD Form 214 shows he had completed a total of 9 years, 5 months and 19 days of active duty service. 

	c.  reenlisted in the RA on 6 November 1987, and served until he retired on 
31 May 1994, as a sergeant/E-5.  His DD Form 214 shows he had completed 
6 years, 6 months, and 25 days of active duty service for the period covered by the DD Form 214 and a total on 16 years and 14 days of active duty service with 3 years of inactive service. 

3.  In his 22 August 2007 letter to ARBA he requested to be advanced on the retired list to the highest grade he satisfactorily held while on active duty as he had a total of 30 years of active service and time on the retired list.  He indicated he previously held the grade of E-6 while on active duty.

4.  The 29 November 2007 HRC letter notified the applicant that he had been advanced on the retired list effective 17 May 2008, to the grade of SSG/E-6. 

5.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, established the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  It states for item 6:  this refers to the completion date of the statutory service obligation incurred by all personnel on initial enlistment or appointment in the Armed Forces.

6.  Title 10 of the U.S. Code, section 3964, provides the legal authority for advancement on the Retired List.  It states, in pertinent part, that retired Soldiers are entitled, when their active service plus service on the Retired List totals 30 years, to be advanced on the Retired List to the highest grade they held and in which they satisfactorily served while on active duty as determined by the Secretary of the service concerned.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  Item 6 of the DD Form 214 refers to the completion date of the statutory service obligation incurred by all personnel on initial enlistment or appointment in the Armed Forces.  That entry on his DD Form 214 should have read “00 00 00.”

2.  The 29 November 2007, HRC letter indicated the applicant was to be advanced on the retired list effective 17 May 2008.  

3.  The evidence shows the applicant completed a total of 16 years and 15 days of active duty service on his 31 May 1994 retirement.  He needed to be on the retired list for an additional 13 years, 11 months, and 15 days to complete a combined total of 30 years.  He was correctly advanced on the retired list effective 17 May 2008. 

4.  In view of the above, the applicant's request should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ___x____  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________x_____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20100013465



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120022344



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016602

    Original file (20100016602.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There were no provisions allowing for the continuation of members in a dual component status subsequent to their length of service retirement from active duty. It states that warrant officer and enlisted members of the Army are entitled, when their active service plus their service on the Retired List totals 30 years, to be advanced on the Retired List to the highest grade in which they served on active duty satisfactorily. Given the applicant never served on active duty in a commissioned...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010182

    Original file (20090010182.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his request for correction to the date of his commission in the United States Army Reserve (USAR) to the day after the date of his release from active duty in the Regular Army. The applicant submitted a copy of email correspondence from the Supervisor, Reserve Appointments Branch, HRC, St. Louis, wherein he was advised, in effect, that he would need to apply to ARBA to have his break in appointment corrected because he did not resign from the RA in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100021241

    Original file (20100021241.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 2 June 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100021241 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he retired with 20 years of service. Therefore, he is entitled to a correction of his records to show he remained on active duty until he had completed 20 years of active Federal service and met retirement eligibility criteria by an operation of law.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20080013041

    Original file (AR20080013041.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations - Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, release from active duty service, or control of the Active Army. The evidence of record shows the applicant completed his initial MSO on 28 February 1975. The evidence of record also shows that the authority for this action was Army Regulation 635-40, paragraph 4-24b(5), disability (other), and the appropriate separation code...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120001381

    Original file (20120001381.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He indicated that he had at least 15 but less than 20 qualifying years of service for retired pay with the last 6 years having been creditable Reserve service (good years). On 7 May 2008, officials at HRC-STL advised him that his records indicated he had completed 19 years of creditable active service and that the remaining 6 years of Selected Reserve service must be good years to qualify for nonregular retirement. Since the applicant did not complete 20 qualifying years of service or...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001599

    Original file (20150001599.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: * the Board finds that he was improperly discharged from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) in 2007 * adjustment of his mandatory removal date (MRD) to reflect the breaks in service * restoration of his highest rank achieved, lieutenant colonel (LTC), and that he be allowed to continue to serve in that capacity until mandatory retirement at age 60 * service credit in the rank of LTC retroactive to the date of his enlistment on 21 February 2014 2. On 3 April 2013, by email,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140011295

    Original file (20140011295.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 11 February 2014, he submitted an application to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR). The applicant provides: * his orders for retirement, dated 9 March 2007 * amendment, dated 19 September 2007, to his retirement orders * his electronic inquiry to DFAS * a letter, dated 16 January 2014, from DFAS * DD Form 149 (Application for Correction of Military Records), dated 11 February 2014 * a letter, dated 10 March 2014, from ARBA * his letter, dated 3 April 2014, to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080007986

    Original file (20080007986.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Item 26 (Separation Authority) of the applicant's DD Form 214, dated 19 June 1998, shows the entry "AR 600-8-24, Para 2-15" indicating that the applicant voluntarily requested release from active duty for the purpose of seeking non-funded graduate medical education and/or training leading to specialty board eligibility and/or internship in accordance with Army Regulation 600-8-24 (Officer Transfer or Discharges). Army Regulation 135-101 (Appointment of Reserve Commissioned Officers for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005924

    Original file (20130005924.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A Unit/Installation Clearance Record shows the applicant was confined from 25 September 1998 through 14 December 1998 by direction of a court-martial. On 6 February 2006, HRC issued an Official Statement of Service showing: * dates of active duty - 20 January 1994 through 19 January 2000 * character of service - uncharacterized * a reenlistment eligibility code - 9 * reason for discharge - in lieu of trial by court-martial * assignment to Company B, 2nd Battalion, 1st Aviation Regiment 16. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008877

    Original file (20140008877.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    During his initial enlistment he was commissioned as a reserve officer in May 1986 and later entered on active duty in June 1987 without a break in service. For advancement to a commissioned officer grade, the Soldier must have served satisfactorily on active duty in this grade for not less than 6 months. Warrant officers and enlisted members of the Army are entitled, when their active service plus their service on the retired list totals 30 years, to be advanced on the Retired List to the...