Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022222
Original file (20120022222.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  9 July 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120022222 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). 

2.  He states he received the Certificate of Merit in recognition of conspicuously meritorious and outstanding performance of military duty and "for outstanding work during combat against our enemy Germany."  He adds he was told by the Certificate of Merit approval authority that the certificate could be exchanged for the BSM. 

3.  The applicant provides his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge) and a European Theater of Operations (ETO), U.S. Army Certificate of Merit.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The applicant's military records are not available to the ABCMR for review.  A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973.  It is believed that the applicant's records were lost or destroyed in that fire.  However, there were sufficient documents remaining for the ABCMR to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case.

3.  Records available to the Board show the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 6 May 1943 and entered active duty on 13 May 1943.  He served in the European-African-Middle Eastern Theater of Operations from 
12 December 1944 to 12 January 1946 and he was honorably discharged on 
27 January 1946.

4.  He provided an ETO Certificate of Merit that indicates he was awarded this certificate in recognition of conspicuously meritorious and outstanding performance of military duty.  The citation reads "for outstanding work during combat against our enemy Germany."  The certificate is signed by a lieutenant colonel (LTC), but contains no date of signature or the period of service for the award.  Additionally, there are no orders provided with the certificate and no orders were found in his available record.  

5.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the BSM is awarded for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service in military operations against an armed enemy.  Award may be made to each member of the Armed Forces of the United States who, after 6 December 1941, has been cited in orders or awarded a certificate for exemplary conduct in ground combat against an armed enemy between 7 December 1941 and 2 September 1945, inclusive, or whose meritorious achievement has been otherwise confirmed by documents executed prior to 1 July 1947.

6.  The same regulation states that the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) may be awarded to any individual commended after 6 December 1941 and before 1 January 1946 in a letter, certificate, or order of commendation, as distinguished from a letter of appreciation, signed by an officer in the grade or position of a major general or higher.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The fact that the applicant provided an ETO Certificate of Merit awarded by a lieutenant colonel is not sufficient evidence upon which to add the BSM to his 
WD AGO Form 53-55.  This authority for the award of the BSM relates specifically to exemplary conduct of meritorious achievement in ground combat.  

2.  However, as specified in the regulation, the ARCOM may be awarded as an alternative to the Certificate of Merit if the award was signed by a major general or higher.  Unfortunately, he provided no Certificate of Merit signed by a major general and no evidence was found in his available personnel record.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence to support addition of the BSM or the ARCOM to his WD AGO Form 53-55.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________x_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120022222





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120022222



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007243C070206

    Original file (20050007243C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's records contain a partially legible Certificate of Disability for Discharge-Report of Medical Board of Officers (WD AGO Form 40). It states, in pertinent part, that in order to award a PH there must be evidence that a member was wounded or injured as a result of enemy action. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was wounded in action in the ETO on 21 March 1945, and awarded the PH in Hospital Center, Camp Edwards GO Number 25 on 4 October 1945.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040010537C070208

    Original file (20040010537C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Larry J. Olson | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. This case is being considered using reconstructed records that primarily consist of the applicant’s separation document (WD AGO Form 53-55).

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090002526

    Original file (20090002526.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence includes orders awarding the FSM the BSM 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (2nd Award) for heroism on 13 and 14 December 1944 in Germany, and a letter from the Commanding General, Army Service Forces, which confirmed the FSM's eligibility for the CMB and directed he be issued this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 33 of his WD AGO Form 53-55 by deleting the current list of awards and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090016439

    Original file (20090016439.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military record is not available to the Board for review. Absent any derogatory information or unit commander disqualification on his WD AGO Form 53-55 or in his NPRC file, it would be appropriate and serve the interest of equity and justice to award the applicant the AGCM for his qualifying honorable active duty service from 18 January 1943 through 1 November 1945, and to add this award to his WD AGO Form 53-55. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005936C071029

    Original file (20070005936C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Purple Heart (PH) and correction of his record to include all awards to which he is entitled based on his World War II service. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Bronze Star Medal 1st Oak Leaf Cluster for his exemplary conduct in ground combat against an armed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010766

    Original file (20090010766.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the CIB on 7 January 1945. However, there is no evidence nor did the applicant provide any evidence that shows he was awarded a BSM for any other period of service other than as a result of his CIB. __________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090010924

    Original file (20090010924.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states that she hopes there is a record of the FSM being awarded the SS because he did earn it and receive it. Given hospital commanders had the authority to award the PH for wounds received in action, this also could possibly be the award the applicant believes the FSM was awarded and for which he received a certificate while in the hospital. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009099

    Original file (20080009099.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records are not available to the Board for review. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 33 of his WD AGO Form 53-55 by deleting the current list of awards and replacing it with the entry "Bronze Star Medal 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (2nd Award), Army Good Conduct Medal, American Defense Service Medal, American Campaign Medal, European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal with 3...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015820

    Original file (20130015820.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Accordingly, he should be awarded the BSM (posthumously) based on his award of the CIB and it should be added to his WD AGO Form 53-55. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding the FSM the BSM (Posthumously) based on his award of the CIB and adding it to his WD AGO Form 53-55. _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004104893C070208

    Original file (2004104893C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Melvin H. Meyer | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Further, the evidence of record confirms that based on his service and campaign participation in the ETO, the applicant is entitled to the Army of Occupation Medal with Germany Clasp and to 2 bronze service stars with his European-African-Middle Eastern Campaign Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...