Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021964
Original file (20120021964.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  20 June 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120021964 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show he entered on active duty on 25 August 1986 and was released from active duty (REFRAD) on 24 October 1988.

2.  The applicant states his DD Form 214 does not reflect the full 2-year enlistment period he enlisted for.  He states he enlisted in the U.S. Army Delayed Entry Program (DEP) on 25 August 1986 for eight years in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR).  On 28 October 1986, he requested discharge from the DEP and enlisted in the Regular Army (RA) for a period of 2 years.  He further states the employment positions he is applying for require 2 years of active duty service.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 and four pages of his DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 25 August 1986, the applicant enlisted in the USAR for 8 years in pay grade E-1 in the DEP.

3.  On 27 October 1986, the applicant was discharged from the DEP and was accepted for enlistment in the RA for a period of 2 years in pay grade E-2.  He enlisted in the RA on 28 October 1986.

4.  On 24 October 1988, the applicant was honorably REFRAD.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time of his REFRAD shows he completed      1 year, 11 months, and 27 days of active service during this period.  Item 18 (Remarks) lists his DEP time as 25 August through 27 October 1986.

5.  On 25 October 1988, he enlisted in the Pennsylvania Army National Guard and he was assigned to the 108th Combat Support Hospital.  On 1 December 1989, the applicant was discharged without personal notice for unsatisfactory participation.

6.  The applicant provides four pages of his DD Form 4 and his DD Form 214.  

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents), in effect at the time, governed the preparation of the DD Form 214.  It stated a DD Form 214 would be prepared for all personnel at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from active duty after completing 90 days or more of continuous active duty time. The regulation also stated for:

* Item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty This Period), enter the beginning date of the continuous period of active duty for issuance of the DD Form 214
* Item 12b (Separation Date This Period), enter the Soldier's transition (separation) date of the continuous period of active duty for issuance of the DD Form 214
* Item 12c (Net Active Service this Period), enter the total amount of service (subtract 12a from 12b), less time lost
 
8.  Army Regulation 635-5 further states DEP time that began on or after 1 January 1985 is not creditable service for pay purposes and will not be entered in item 12c.  However, it is creditable service for completing the statutory military service obligation (MSO) and will be entered in item 18.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  He enlisted in the DEP on 25 August 1986 and he was discharged from the DEP on 27 October 1986.  DEP time that began on or after 1 January 1985 is not creditable service for pay purposes; however, it is creditable service for completing the statutory MSO and will be entered in item 18.

2.  He enlisted in the RA on 28 October 1986.  This is the date he entered active duty.  He was released from active duty on 24 October 1988 (a period of 1 year, 11 months, and 27 days).  As such, he did not complete the 2 years of active duty service he requests to add to his DD Form 214. 

3.  The DD Form 4 he provided correctly shows his date of enlistment in the RA which is the date he entered active duty.  There is no evidence to support his contention that his DD Form 214 is in error and unjust; therefore, there is no basis for granting the requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ____x___  ____x ___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________x_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120021964





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120021964



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090003711

    Original file (20090003711.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's record contains a DD Form 214 that shows while a member of the USAR, she entered active duty on 22 May 1989. The evidence further confirms that when the applicant was issued her DD Form 214, on 19 April 1993, the she had completed a total of 6 years, 3 months, and 29 days of prior inactive service. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002075830C070403

    Original file (2002075830C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. The opinion recommended that that the applicant’s request be denied and that he not be given credit for the period 25 January 1986 through 20 May 1986. An advisory opinion to this Board stated that when the applicant enlisted in the United States Army through the DEP his military obligation to the USMC ended and recommended that he not be given credit for the time he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021292

    Original file (20110021292.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His request for RSLSP was denied twice because item 6 (Reserve Obligation Termination Date) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 26 September 2003 shows 26 September 2003. The evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted in the USAR on 14 September 1994, served in the DEP from 14 September 1994 to 16 January 1995, and entered active duty in the RA on 17 January 1995. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140005348

    Original file (20140005348.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show: * Air Assault Badge * Army Achievement Medal (AAM) (2nd Award) * he was honorably discharged * he was promoted to specialist four (SP4)/pay grade E-4 * he served in the Delaware National Guard 2. As such, there is no basis for correcting the applicant's DD Form 214 to show his DEARNG service or his honorable discharge from the USAR. Absent orders which awarded him this medal...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090021755

    Original file (20090021755.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that the following corrections be made to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty): a. upgrade his character of service from general to fully honorable. His DD Form 214 shows he completed 1 year, 8 months, and 6 days of creditable active military service. With respect to the narrative reason for separation, his service records show he was discharged under the provisions of paragraph 14-12c of Army Regulation 635-200 due to his misconduct...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013866

    Original file (20140013866.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Table 2-1, Rule 3, provided that for Regular Army commissioned officers who were discharged (including those who resigned their commission) and accepted appointment in the USAR, the entry in Item 9 would show the officer was assigned to the USAR CON GP (Annual Training or Reinforcement, as appropriate); and c. for Item 23, enter the appropriate term (REFRAD, Discharge, Retirement, REFRAD and Order to Active Duty in Another Status, Release from Active Duty for Training (ADT), Release from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017902

    Original file (20090017902.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military records show she enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) DEP in pay grade E-1 on 26 September 2003 for 8 years and was released from the DEP on 13 July 2004. The evidence of record shows the applicant enlisted in the DEP on 26 September 2003 for a period of 8 years and incurred an MSO until 25 September 2011. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending item 6 of the applicant's...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024898

    Original file (20110024898.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Subsequent to this acknowledgement, the applicant’s immediate commander recommended the applicant be discharged with a General Discharge Certificate. Army Regulation 140-158 (Enlisted Personnel Classification, Promotion, and Reduction), in effect at the time, provided for promotion of Soldiers in the IRR. There is no evidence of record and he provides none to show he held a higher rank/grade between the date his suspended reduction was vacated and the date of his REFRAD.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002081142C070215

    Original file (2002081142C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board concluded that the applicant's commander recommended that he be placed in the IRR; however, his DD Form 214 and orders confirmed that the applicant's discharge was directed and fail to show transfer. The separation authority directed transfer to the IRR; however, the applicant's orders and DD Form 214 failed to show transfer. The regulation clearly stated that soldiers separated for unsatisfactory performance whose service is characterized as honorable would be transferred to the IRR.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001125

    Original file (20140001125.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Additionally, he requests his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending on 2 March 1988 be corrected to show: * Item 12a (Date Entered Active Duty (AD) this Period) 28 March 1986 * 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) an unidentified date * Item “14” (i.e., should be Item 11 (Primary Specialty Number, Title and Years and Months in Specialty)) add military occupational specialty (MOS) of 75E (Personnel Actions Specialist) * Item 18 (Remarks) correct...