Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021125
Original file (20120021125.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  18 July 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120021125 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, as an exception to policy, the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) under the provisions of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his only child.

2.  The applicant states:

* his transferability request was denied
* an official from the Education Incentives Branch, Fort Knox, KY advised him of the requirement that a Soldier had to be on active duty or an active participating member the Selected Reserve in order to transfer benefits
* he was unaware of the requirement until after his son's high school graduation on 27 May 2012
* based on his rank, it seems he should have known the details of the
Post-9/11 GI Bill
* he was part of a small embedded training team with no real administrative support
* he redeployed out of Fort Riley, KS when the deployment/redeployment mission on the base was shutting down and his small group was out-processed quickly without a Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) benefit briefing
* he went on Standby Reserve status since he was working as a civil contractor in Afghanistan
* he would have transferred his benefits had he known the requirements


3.  The applicant provides:

* three DOD Letters of Authorization, dated 6 September 2011, 12 July 2012, and 25 September 2012
* emails between 31 January and 19 July 2012
* Total Army Personnel Database-Reserve (TAPDB-R) printout
* Congressional correspondence

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Having had prior enlisted service in the Regular Army, the applicant was appointed a second lieutenant in the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) on 12 August 1984.  He held area of concentration 13A (Field Artillery, General).

2.  On 2 April 2002, he received his notification of eligibility for retired pay at age 60.

3.  He served through multiple assignments and he attained the rank/grade of lieutenant colonel (LTC)/O-5.

4.  His last period of active duty service was 11 May 2009 through 11 July 2010.

5.  Orders Number C-05-207117, issued by the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), Fort Knox, dated 17 May 2012, released the applicant from the Standby Reserve (Active List) and transferred him to the Retired Reserve, effective 1 September 2012.

6.  The applicant provides emails and congressional correspondence showing his attempts to transfer educational benefits to his son and a TAPDB-R printout showing his status in July 2012.  He also provides three DOD Letters of Authorization that show his status as a civilian contractor for the periods 7 April 2011 to 29 March 2012, 21 July 2012 to 26 September 2012, and 20 September 2012 to 22 July 2013.

7.  On 22 June 2009, DOD established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible family members.  The policy states any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of the approval of the individual's request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and

	a.  has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election; or
	b.  has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by either standard policy (service or DOD) or statute from committing to 4 additional years, and agrees to serve for the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy or statute; or

	c.  is or becomes retirement eligible during the period from 1 August 2009 through 1 August 2013.  A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service.

8.  A Soldier must be currently on active duty or a member of the Selected Reserve at the time of transfer of education benefits to his or her family members (on or after 1 August 2009).  

9.  The policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide active duty participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying active duty service individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill and document accordingly and maintain records for individuals who receive supplemental educational assistance under Public Law 110-252, section 3316.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was fully eligible to transfer his education benefits under the TEB, but he did not do so.  His last period of active service was 11 May 2009 through 11 July 2010.  From 1 August 2009 until July 2010 he had ample time to submit a request.  He could have also submitted a request at any time during a subsequent period of service in the Selected Reserve.

2.  The DOD, VA, and the Army conducted massive public campaigns that generated major communications on the TEB through military, public, and social media venues.  Although he states he was serving in a unit with minimal administrative support and out-processed without a VA benefit briefing, there is no evidence indicating he was deprived of the information broadly disseminated through the public campaigns.  

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.


BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X_  ___X_____  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ________X_______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120021125



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120021125



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008969

    Original file (20120008969.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an exception to policy to transfer educational benefits to his family members under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The applicant in this case had more than 20 years of service upon his retirement, but he was not eligible to transfer the benefits because the law requires Soldiers to be in the service on or after 1 August 2009. c. A Soldier may only transfer benefits to eligible dependants. The TEB online database shows the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000224

    Original file (20120000224.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A Soldier must have at least 6 years of eligible service in order to transfer educational benefits to a spouse and at least 10 years of eligible service to transfer benefits to eligible children. The applicant had more than 23 years of service upon his retirement, so he was eligible to transfer benefits to either his spouse or children if he had completed the request before leaving military service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120002356

    Original file (20120002356.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant states: * he submitted the transfer of benefits on 8 June 2011 via the Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) TEB website and upon submission, the website indicated his submission was in accordance with the instructions; therefore, he did not print a copy of his submission * after waiting for several months, he was informed by the TEB that there was no record of his submission; he contacted multiple agencies in an effort to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022465

    Original file (20110022465.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an exception to policy to transfer educational benefits to his dependents under the transfer of educational benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The advisory official recommended disapproval of the applicant's request because there is no evidence the applicant attempted to transfer the benefit to his son prior to leaving active or Reserve military service. A Soldier must be currently on active duty or a member of the Selected Reserve at the time of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150000720

    Original file (20150000720.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was eligible to transfer his education benefits under the TEB prior to retirement, but there is no documentary evidence he did so. As evidence to support his application, he provided a milConnect form that shows he was not eligible to transfer the benefits to his spouse and child. Further, there is insufficient evidence to support a conclusion that a formal hearing is necessary to serve the interest of justice in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001905

    Original file (20130001905.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show his educational benefits were transferred to his eligible family members in a timely manner in accordance with the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The applicant states he completed an online request in 2009 to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his two children. He provides an unsigned and undated letter from Senator C____ addressed to the VA stating the applicant recently received...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120007417

    Original file (20120007417.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, an exception to policy to transfer his education benefits to his dependent under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. The applicant states he thought he had transferred his benefits to his daughter, but it did not happen. The advisory official recommended disapproval of the applicant's request because the applicant did not provide evidence showing he attempted to transfer his education benefits prior to leaving...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014094

    Original file (20140014094.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 17 July 2014, he was informed by Mr. T____ E____, VA Education Services, that the application for the TEB option should have been offered to him prior to separation from the service. However, this was the first time he learned there was a requirement to be approved for TEB prior to separation from the service and this option should have been offered to him upon his release from the NCARNG and at the time of retirement. He is asking that the Board correct his records to show he requested...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110018149

    Original file (20110018149.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an exception to policy to back-date the date he transferred his education benefits under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his dependent from 24 November 2010 to 7 April 2010. On 22 June 2009, the DOD established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused education benefits to eligible family members. The policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide active duty participants and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021027

    Original file (20110021027.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He would have been eligible to transfer the benefits before he retired. The available evidence shows the applicant was fully eligible to transfer his education benefits under the TEB prior to retirement but did not do so. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed his application and the Army approved his request to transfer Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his eligible family member prior...