Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020894
Original file (20120020894.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:  

		BOARD DATE:  2 July 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120020894 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his records to show his current wife is the beneficiary of his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).
2.  The applicant states that:
	a.   He and his first wife were divorced in August 2008.  At the time of the divorce he had no one to list as SBP beneficiary.  He married his current wife in July 2009.  They went to Fort Knox, Kentucky to enroll her in the Defense Enrollment Eligibility Reporting System (DEERS) and to get her an identification card.  He also had her listed as his beneficiary, including SBP.  At the time, the clerk told him everything had been changed.  However, he has learned his wife was never added to the SBP.  
	b.  He believes this was an error on the part of the officials at Fort Knox.  He also believes the correction should be made to enroll his spouse as his SBP beneficiary.  If something should happen to him, she would lose all monetary support and medical benefits.  
	c.  He would like this done as soon as possible, as he has been diagnosed with pancreatic cancer.  (Evidence on file shows he died on 12 February 2013).





3.  The applicant provides copies of:

* The marriage certificate with current spouse
* DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) 
* Final Divorce Decree

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 1 March 1989.  He served in various assignments and attained the rank of staff sergeant/E-6. 

2.  He was retired due to permanent disability effective 26 July 2009.  He had completed a total of 19 years and 27 days of net active service.

3.  The applicant provides the following documents:

	a.  Certified Copy of a Final Divorce Decree showing he divorced Teresa on 12 August 2008.  The decree is silent concerning the SBP.  

	b.  Marriage Certificate, dated 27 July 2009, showing he married Lucinda on 22 July 2009.

	c.  DD Form 2656, dated 17 December 2012, showing an "X" was placed in item 26 (Beneficiary Category) indicating he had dependent children and his spouse (Lucinda ) is listed in item 28 (Insurable Interest Beneficiary).

4.  Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, established the SBP.  The SBP provided that military members on active duty could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents.  An election, once made, was irrevocable except in certain circumstances.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1.  The applicant states he and his wife went to Fort Knox, Kentucky, to enroll her in DEERS and to get her an identification card.  He also had her put down as his beneficiary, including for SBP, and he was told everything was taken care of.  Now he has learned she was not added to the SBP.  
2.  The evidence shows he married Lucinda on 22 July 2009 and he retired 
26 July 2009.  He was married to Lucinda when he retired.  Accordingly, in the absence of any evidence showing she declined spouse coverage under SBP, Lucinda became his spouse beneficiary by operation of law.

3.  In view of the foregoing, and out of an abundance of caution given the applicant's poor health at the time, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's records to show he elected SBP coverage for his spouse at the time of retirement.

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned by corrected by showing the applicant completed and returned a DD Form 2656 and related documents to the proper office on 25 July 2009, that they were received and processed by the proper office in a timely manner, and paying the applicant’s widow the SBP annuity, if eligible, retroactive to the day after his death.



      ____________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR2002076477





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120020894



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022811

    Original file (20100022811.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel) provided by DFAS shows the following: * retirement date – 1 October 2004 * spouse – F____ * child – S____ with a date of birth of 23 July 1991 * SBP election – 26b, coverage for spouse and child(ren) * date signed – 7 July 2004 4. DFAS stated in an email to this Board, dated 9 May 2011, the FSM's DD Form 2656 was submitted by Fort Carson on 3 November 2004 and shows he elected spouse and child(ren) coverage. The applicant and the FSM...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070001910

    Original file (20070001910.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    When he remarried and added his present spouse as his SBP beneficiary in 2005, DFAS dropped the SBP election. In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his Final Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage, filed 13 December 2002; a copy of their Marital Settlement Agreement, dated 9 October 2002; a copy of a letter the applicant wrote to DFAS, Subject: Correct My Mistake, dated 16 June 2006; a copy of a DD Form 2656-9, Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) and Reserve Component Survivor...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007495

    Original file (20140007495.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for his spouse within one year of his remarriage. The applicant provides: * DD Form 2656-6, dated 4 April 2014 * Certificate of marriage (Connie), dated 12 February 2013 * Emails to DFAS * Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 * DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Certificate) * DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), dated 7 July 2008 * National Guard...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012822

    Original file (20060012822.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM divorced M___ E___ in 1982. MEMBER NEVER CANCELED HIS SBP ELECTION AFTER HIS DIVORCE. The evidence of record shows he was not married to the applicant at the time of his death.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016016

    Original file (20130016016.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This letter further informed him that by law, he had only 90 calendar days from the date he received this letter to submit his DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Certificate). The applicant's records do not indicate he elected to participate in the RCSBP within 90 days of receiving his 20-year letter, and it appears he...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008085

    Original file (20130008085.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his records to show he changed his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) election from spouse to former spouse coverage. DFAS records show the applicant currently has SBP spouse coverage. Since the applicant's retired pay account reflects spouse SBP coverage, Rosario H------- is the lawful beneficiary of his SBP, unless they are divorced.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060003713C070205

    Original file (20060003713C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Public Law 98-94, dated 24 September 1983, established SBP for former spouses of already retired members and reservists. The evidence of record shows that the FSM was placed on the Retired List, and elected not to participate in the SBP. The evidence shows that the applicant, the former spouse, was entitled to Retired pay, not SBP by the divorce decree.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023390

    Original file (20110023390.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides: * Orders 343-072 (Retired Reserve) * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 23B (Army National Guard (ARNG) Retirement Points History Statement) * Letters from her divorce attorney * Superior Court of the State of New York, County of Orange, Court Order – Acceptance for Processing and Amended Court Order – Acceptable for Processing * Correspondence with and from DFAS * DD Form 2656-10 (SBP/RCSBP Request for Deemed Election) * Copies of certified mail receipts * Letter from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080002215

    Original file (20080002215.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his military records be corrected to show that he established former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) for his former spouse within the 1-year period required by his divorce decree. The applicant states, in effect, that he was divorced on 7 April 2005 and in February 2006, he submitted his DD Form 2656-1 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Statement for Former Spouse Coverage) along with his divorce decree to the DFAS. Public Law 99-661, dated 14...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019394

    Original file (20110019394.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * She mailed a deemed election form and the divorce decree to the Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) in a timely manner (January 2010) * Her request was initially denied by DFAS because they were unable to find the paperwork * The record reflects she did not file the paperwork within the proper time frame * It would be unjust to deny her SBP benefits because DFAS was unable to locate the records * It was the FSM's request per the Stipulation Agreement of...