Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020526
Original file (20120020526.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  20 June 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120020526 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests award of Bronze Star Medal for the FSM.

2.  The applicant states:

* the medal is missing on the FSM's DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty)
* the veteran's cemetery requires documentation in order to place the medal on the FSM's headstone
* the family desires the FSM's records to be checked

3.  The applicant provides:

* Certificate of Death
* letter, National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), dated 15 October 2012

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 17 February 1971, the FSM enlisted in the Regular Army for a 3-year period.  He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 36K (Field Wireman).

3.  The FSM served in Vietnam during the period 28 April 1971 to 21 February 1972.  He was assigned to the following units while in Vietnam:

* Company B, 2d Battalion, 503d Infantry, 173d Airborne Brigade, 4 May 1971 to 10 May 1971 
* Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 2d Battalion, 503d Infantry, 173d Airborne Brigade, 11 May 1971 to 14 July 1971
* Headquarters and Headquarters Battery, 6th Battalion, 11th Artillery, 21 July 1971 to 17 October 1971
* Battery B, 3d Battalion, 82d Artillery, 18 October 1971 to 19 November 1971
* Battery A, 3d Battalion, 82d Artillery, 20 November 1971 to 20 February 1972

4.  The FSM was honorably released from active duty on 21 February 1974 and transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve Control Group (Annual Training).  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time does not show award of the Bronze Star Medal.

5.  His records do not contain orders awarding him the Bronze Star Medal.  Additionally, item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show the Bronze Star Medal.

6.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System, an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders for the Bronze Star Medal pertaining to the FSM.

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Bronze Star Medal is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request for award of the Bronze Star Medal to the FSM was carefully considered.

2.  There is no evidence in the available record that shows the FSM was awarded the Bronze Star Medal.  The governing Army regulation states that for personal decorations (which include the Bronze Star Medal) formal recommendation, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.

3.  In the absence of orders or any other corroborating documents, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120020526



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120020526



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050004761C070206

    Original file (20050004761C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 15 NOVEMBER 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20050004761 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant states that he received orders for the CIB in the field in Vietnam but, was not given the award citation and it was not included on his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005213

    Original file (20130005213.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 for this period shows: a. his last duty assignment was the 516th PSC, U.S. Army Vietnam; b. his MOS as 71B (Clerk Typist); c. his service in the Republic of Vietnam from 18 September 1971 to 26 April 1972; and d. he was awarded or authorized the: * National Defense Service Medal * Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Army Commendation Medal * Vietnam Service Medal 9. The 3d Battalion, 503d Infantry, was awarded the: *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023709

    Original file (20110023709.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, he is entitled to four bronze service stars for wear on his Vietnam Service Medal and correction of his DD Form 214 to show the four bronze service stars. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show these unit awards. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service Medal and the Combat Infantryman Badge; and b. adding to his DD Form 214 the: *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 2013001311437

    Original file (2013001311437.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record also shows: a. the applicant served during four campaign periods and is entitled to four bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal; and b. general orders awarded the applicant's unit the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130011437

    Original file (20130011437.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence of record also shows: a. the applicant served during four campaign periods and is entitled to four bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal; and b. general orders awarded the applicant's unit the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. As a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001065570C070421

    Original file (2001065570C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show award of two Air Medals, the Good Conduct Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars, the Bronze Star Medal, the Presidential Unit Citation, the Meritorious Unit Commendation, the Army Commendation Medal, and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Unit Citation with Palm. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Army for three years on 13 June 1966, and completed basic, advanced infantry, and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003622

    Original file (20120003622 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    There are no orders contained in the applicant's official military records showing he was awarded a second Bronze Star Medal. There is no evidence in the available record and the applicant has not submitted any evidence showing he was awarded a second Bronze Star Medal for service while assigned to Company K, 75th Airborne Ranger Battalion. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 for the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040003055C070208

    Original file (20040003055C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 also shows that, at the time of the applicant's assignment to the 2d Battalion, 503d Infantry, it was cited for award of the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation for the period 15 April 1969 through 16 March 1971 by DAGO Number 5 dated 1973. However, those records were not available to the Board. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a....

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080019229

    Original file (20080019229.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Headquarters, 173d Airborne Brigade (Separate), General Orders Number 797, dated 8 May 1967, show the applicant received the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service for the period 6 October 1966 to 14 April 1967. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 1 October...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009762

    Original file (20090009762.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The regulation also stated, in pertinent part, that for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950, a period of service of less than 3 years but more than 1 year qualified for award of the AGCM. However, the applicant has not provided and the official records do not contain evidence to show that he was recommended for or awarded the Air Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...