Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020131
Original file (20120020131.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  2 July 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120020131 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show that his award of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) has a “V” Device.

2.  The applicant states that his DD Form 214 fails to show the “V” Device on his award of the BSM, which was awarded for combat.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant entered active duty as a U.S. Army Reserve fixed-wing aviator on 25 February 1966.  He held the rank of captain when he was transferred to Vietnam.  He was assigned to the 183rd Reconnaissance Airplane Company. 

3.  On 19 March 1968, General Orders Number 1536, issued by Headquarters, 1st Aviation Brigade awarded the applicant the BSM for meritorious service in connection with military operations against a hostile force for the period May 1967 to March 1968. 

4.  His records are void of any additional orders awarding him the BSM with "V" Device for heroism. 

5.  He was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 24 February 1969.  His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), BSM, Distinguished Flying Cross, Silver Star, and the Air Medal (AM) with “V” Device (27th Oak Leaf Cluster).

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the BSM is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service, not involving participation in aerial flight, in connection with military operations against an armed enemy, or while engaged in military operations involving conflict with an opposing armed force in which the United States is not a belligerent party.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.  

7.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 states the bronze “V” device indicates acts of heroism involving conflict with an armed enemy and authorizes the device in conjunction with awards of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM), AM, and BSM.  Although more than one award of the ARCOM, AM, or the BSM may be made for heroism to the same person, only one “V” Device may be worn on awards of these medals.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s contention that his BSM should reflect a “V” Device because it was awarded for combat has been noted.

2.  There is no provision that allows for the “V” Device to be added to the BSM simply because it was awarded for service in a combat zone (imminent danger area).

3.  The “V” Device is awarded for acts of heroism and such awards are indicated in the orders that are published for the award.  It is possible the BSM with “V” Device was an interim award pending approval of either of his other heroism awards, but if so then it would have been revoked upon approval of the higher award.  However, his record is absent orders indicating he was awarded the BSM with "V" Device for any reason and he has not provided any such orders.

4.  In the applicant’s case, he was awarded the BSM for meritorious service and not an act of heroism and therefore is not entitled to have a “V” Device added to his award of the BSM at this time.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during the Vietnam War.  The applicant and all Americans should be justifiably proud of his service in arms.



      _______ _   __X_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120020131



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120020131



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120008357

    Original file (20120008357.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The following general orders (GO) published by Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division awarded the applicant the following awards as indicated: * GO Number 7566, dated 26 August 1968, awarded him the BSM with "V" Device for heroism in Vietnam on 24 June 1968 * GO Number 8191, dated 9 September 1968, awarded him BSM with "V" Device for heroism in Vietnam on 12 and 13 August 1968 * GO Number 2550, dated 5 March 1969, awarded him the BSM (2nd OLC) for meritorious service in Vietnam for the period...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040004585C070208

    Original file (20040004585C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 May 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040004585 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The evidence of record includes copies of GOs awarding the applicant the PH 1st Oak Leaf Cluster and ARCOM. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013714

    Original file (20140013714 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant contends, in effect, that his records should be corrected to show 15 additional awards of the AM (i.e., the AM with Numeral 16) because he accrued 763 hours of combat assault or combat support flight time. There is no evidence that shows the applicant was recommended for or awarded more than one AM. e. However, based on the evidence of record (i.e., certification by the operations officer that the applicant accrued 453 flight hours) and the conclusion they were category III...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008144

    Original file (20070008144.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show the awards of the Bronze Star Medal (BSM), Air Medal (AM) with "V" Device, and the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM). The applicant's records show that he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. The certificate showing award of the BSM is insufficient evidence without the respective awards order to correct the applicant’s DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017292

    Original file (20110017292.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows he completed 2 years, 7 months, and 4 days of creditable active duty service and item 26 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) shows he received the following awards: * National Defense Service Medal (NDSM) * ARCOM with "V" Device * Aircraft Crewman Badge (ACB) * Parachutist Badge * Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) * RVN Campaign Medal with Device 1960 * 2 Overseas Bars * Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003087195C070212

    Original file (2003087195C070212.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in essence, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Air Medal (AM) with four Oak Leaf Clusters (OLC), the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with OLC, and the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB). The applicants record contains three orders from Headquarters, 9th Infantry Division which shows that he was awarded the AM, CIB and the ARCOM with "V" Device. The available evidence supports that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005599

    Original file (20110005599.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) with "V" Device and Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device. Based on his overall record of service, it would be appropriate to award him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal and to correct his DD Form 214 to show this award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024785

    Original file (20110024785.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: a. correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to add award of the Combat Infantryman Badge (CIB) and a second award of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) and b. an upgrade of the ARCOM he received for meritorious service to the Bronze Star Medal (BSM). There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000899

    Original file (20140000899.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal (BSM) with "V" Device, the Air Medal (AM) (2nd and 3rd Awards), and the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) Gallantry Cross with Bronze Star. The 57th Aviation Company was awarded the Valorous Unit Award, RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and RVN Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Unit Citation by general orders during his...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070011507C080407

    Original file (20070011507C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's record contains an Office of The Adjutant General, United States Army Reserve Components Personnel and Administration Center (ARPERCEN) letter, dated 7 April 1980, which includes a DA Form 1577 (Authorization for Issuance of Awards) that indicates that the applicant was authorized and issued the following awards: AM with Numeral 2 (3rd Award); ARCOM; AGCM; Meritorious Unit Emblem; NDSM; VSM with 1 silver service star and 1 bronze service star; and RVN Campaign Medal with...