Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019933
Original file (20120019933.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	 18 June 2013 

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120019933 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

2.  The applicant states he would like a review of his records to determine if he was awarded or is entitled to award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 21 July 1967 and served through 21 February 1969, attaining the rank/pay grade of specialist five/E-5.

3.  The applicant served in Vietnam with Headquarters and Headquarters Detachment, 210th Combat Aviation Battalion, from 14 December 1967 through 22 February 1969.

4.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows:

	a.  three conduct and efficiency ratings, two recorded as "excellent" and one conduct rating of "good"; and

	b.  award of the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), Army Commendation Medal, and Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar.

5.  His DD Form 214 lists his awards as the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and Army Commendation Medal.

6.  The applicant's records contain no disciplinary actions, nonjudicial punishment, courts-martial, or a commander's disqualification for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal.

7.  Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for the first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year.  The enlisted person must have had all "excellent" conduct and efficiency ratings.  Ratings of "unknown" for portions of the period under consideration were not disqualifying.  Service school efficiency ratings based upon academic proficiency of at least "good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 were not disqualifying.  There must have been no convictions by a court-martial.  However, there was no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander made a positive recommendation for its award and until the awarding authority announced the award in general orders.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

The applicant's receipt of a "good" conduct rating disqualified him from entitlement to the Army Good Conduct Medal based on the Army regulation in effect at the time.  Therefore, no relief is warranted.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ____________X_____________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120019933



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120019933



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080005679

    Original file (20080005679.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's record shows that he received excellent ratings in conduct and efficiency during his period of active duty service as evidenced by his DA Forms 20 and 137. The applicant completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service from 10 November 1965 through 9 August 1967 with excellent conduct and efficiency ratings and no court-martial convictions, reductions in grade or lost time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022575

    Original file (20100022575.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) and all other combat citations awarded to Company B, 47th Engineer Battalion. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Decorations and Awards), in effect at the time, provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090001256

    Original file (20090001256.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) provides the following pertinent information: a. advancement to specialist four; b. service in Vietnam during one campaign period; c. service in Vietnam from 8 July 1965 through 25 July 1966; d. his authorized awards are the Parachutist Badge, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Combat Medical Badge, the Purple Heart, the Army Commendation Medal with "V" Device, the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008339

    Original file (20130008339.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) provides the following: * advancement to specialist four (E-4) on 12 October 1967 * service in Vietnam with Company B, 4th Battalion, 9th Infantry Regiment from 3 March 1967 through 21 April 1967 * he sustained wounds to his left arm and leg on 2 April 1967 * transfer to the Army Hospital, Camp Zama, Japan as a patient on 22 April 1967 with subsequent transfer to Valley Forge General Hospital on 20 June 1967 * award of the National Defense...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140020799

    Original file (20140020799.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 20 provides the following – * advancement to sergeant (E-5) on 1 September 1967 * award of military occupational specialty 11E (Armor Crewman) on 21 May 1966 and 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman) on 1 September 1967 * service in Vietnam from 9 June to 16 July 1967 with E Troop, 17th Cavalry Regiment * service in Vietnam from 17 July 1967 through 21 November 1967 with Company A, 4th Battalion, 503rd Infantry * conduct and efficiency ratings of "excellent" except for one...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100027055

    Original file (20100027055.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Decorations and Awards) provided that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded to individuals who completed a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. The evidence shows he completed a qualifying period of service for award of the National Defense Service Medal which is not shown on his DD Form 214. b. adding the: * National Defense Service Medal * Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars * Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140021357

    Original file (20140021357 .txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows – * promotion to sergeant (E-5) on 21 July 1967 * service in the military occupational specialty 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman) from 27 October 1965 to 15 February 1967 and 76Y (Unit and Organization Supply Specialist from 16 February 1967 through the end of his enlistment * service in Vietnam from 18 June 1966 through 22 August 1966 * assignment in Vietnam with Company A, 2nd Battalion, 35th Infantry Regiment, 25th Infantry...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140008201

    Original file (20140008201.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940; for first award only, 1 year served entirely during the period 7 December 1941 to 2 March 1946; and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. Therefore, item 22c of his DD Form 214 should be corrected...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010530

    Original file (20080010530.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His records show that while he was in the Army his conduct and efficiency ratings were excellent and as such, he was timely promoted. Therefore, it would be appropriate to award him the Good Conduct Medal at this time. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending his DD Form 214 to void the award of the Vietnam Service Medal and the Vietnam Campaign Medal;” b. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005554

    Original file (20110005554.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence clearly shows the applicant was awarded an infantryman MOS and was assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size while assigned in the RVN. Records show the applicant participated in three campaigns during his service in the RVN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) for the period 4 August 1967 to 28 March 1969, b....