Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019731
Original file (20120019731.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  10 January 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120019731 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR) be removed from her Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) (formerly called the official military personnel file (OMPF)).

2.  She states she received a GOMOR on 7 March 2010 for allegedly driving while impaired (DWI) prior to going to court for the findings.  She maintains the DWI was dropped completely because there was no evidence to prove that she was under the influence of any substance.  She adds she also had to go before the 18th Airborne Corps Commanding Officer who gave her a reversal memorandum stating to remove the GOMOR from her AMHRR.

3.  She provides the following:

* Statement from her DWI attorney
* Court case
* Court judgment, page 1 of 5 pages 
* Memorandum, Subject:  Request for Removal of a GOMOR, dated 
29 January 2011

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's record shows she is currently a staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6 on active duty.

2.  On 8 April 2010, she received a GOMOR for DWI.  The GOMOR stated that on 7 March 2010, after being stopped for illegal passing and speeding, she refused to provide a lawfully requested intoximeter test.  

3.  On an unspecified date, she acknowledged receipt of the GOMOR and on 
12 May 2010, she provided a statement on her behalf.  She said she redeployed after serving two consecutive deployments and had a poor lapse in judgment for just one night.  She requested the GOMOR be placed in her local personnel file so she could continue with her career.

4.  On 19 July 2010, the imposing authority directed the GOMOR be filed in her AMHRR.

5.  On 26 September 2011, she applied to the Department of the Army Suitability Evaluation Board (DASEB) to have the GOMOR removed.  On 18 November 2011, the DASEB denied the applicant's request for removal and stated she failed to provide clear and convincing evidence that the GOMOR was untrue or unjust.

6.  Court documents from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, filed on 11 May 2010, show the applicant was charged with two counts on 7 March 2010:

* Count One - operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an impairing substance 
* Count Two - recklessly operating a motor vehicle without due caution and circumspection and at a speed or in a manner so as to endanger or be likely to endanger any person or property

7.  The court judgment shows the applicant plead guilty to Count Two, "Careless and Reckless by Speed."  Her sentence was provided on pages 2 through 5, but she failed to provide those pages.  The judgment also shows Count One was dismissed on the motion of the United States.

8.  The applicant provided a letter from her DWI attorney, dated 9 December 2010, that stated the applicant was charged with DWI, but the charge was dismissed and she pleaded guilty to a charge of careless and reckless driving.

9.  In a memorandum, Subject:  Request for Removal of a GOMOR, dated 
29 January 2011, the "Acting Commander" initialed the statement "Removed from your military personnel record jacket."

10.  Army Regulation 600-37 (Unfavorable Information) states once an official document has been properly filed in the AMHRR, it is presumed to be administratively correct and to have been filed pursuant to an object decision by competent authority.  Thereafter, the burden of proof rests with the individual concerned to provide evidence of a clear and convincing nature that the document is untrue or unjust, in whole or in part, thereby warranting its alteration or removal from the AMHRR.

11.  Army Regulation 190-5 (Motor Vehicle Traffic Supervision) states that Army commanders (any general officer, and any officer frocked to the grade of brigadier general) will take appropriate action against intoxicated drivers.  These actions may include a written reprimand, administrative in nature, issued to active duty Soldiers who refuse to take or failure to complete a lawfully requested test to measure alcohol or drug content of the blood, breath, or urine, either on or off the installation, when there is reasonable belief of driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's attorney stated the charge of DWI was dismissed and she pleaded guilty to a charge of careless and reckless driving.  This indicates she "plea bargained" with the court for a lesser offense.  Regardless of whether or not the charge was dismissed, the fact of the matter is she "refused" to consent to a breath analysis test.  As cited in Army Regulation 190-5, a written reprimand may be issued to active duty Soldiers who refuse to take a breath analysis test.

2.  Additionally, the memorandum she provided from the acting commander indicating that the GOMOR be removed from her "military personnel record jacket" is not the same as removing the GOMOR from her AMHRR.  Nevertheless, this memorandum is not sufficient evidence to conclude the GOMOR was inaccurate or unjust.

3.  There is no evidence and she has not provided any to show that the GOMOR was rendered in error.  Therefore, in the absence of more compelling evidence, there is no basis to grant the relief requested.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120019731





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120019731



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004838

    Original file (20140004838.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, on 4 September 2012, [Applicant] received a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand, which was filed in his OMPF, based on his arrest at FT. [sic] Bragg on 14 June 2012 for failing to maintain his lane and refusal to submit to a breathalyzer resulting in a charge of driving while intoxicated. On 21 September 2012, in a memorandum for his senior rater, the applicant stated: In response to the Officer Evaluation Report Referral, I respectfully submit the following: On 15 June 2012 I...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007119

    Original file (20140007119.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was subsequently charged with driving while intoxicated (DWI) and refusal to submit to a breathalyzer test, which resulted in him receiving the GOMOR at issue here. The GOMOR states, in part: You are hereby reprimanded for driving while intoxicated. You were then charged with driving while intoxicated.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003463

    Original file (20140003463.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests removal of a general officer memorandum of reprimand (GOMOR), dated 1 October 2009, from the restricted section of his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) (formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File). He could now begin the process of trying to correct his military records because he now had evidence to prove that he had not been DUI or driving while intoxicated and the blood alcohol level of .133 or higher did not match with all the other facts of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120000936

    Original file (20120000936.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 19 April 2006, the applicant's senior commander recommended that the GOMOR be filed in the applicant's OMPF. Neither the applicant nor his counsel has provided any conclusive evidence that shows the record of his prior driving offenses was in error or that it was the deciding factor for the BG's filing decision. The PRB reviewed the GOMOR, the applicant's complete military records, and his rebuttal, to include the information he provided on the disposition for the charges against him,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130008119

    Original file (20130008119.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests removal of a general officer memorandum of reprimand (GOMOR) from his U.S. Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR) (formerly known as official military personnel file (OMPF)) or, in effect, in the alternative he requests transfer of the GOMOR to the restricted section of his AMHRR. A memorandum of reprimand may be filed in a Soldier's AMHRR only upon the order of a general officer-level authority and is to be filed in the performance section. The evidence of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001188

    Original file (20150001188 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Counsel requests removal of the applicant's general officer memoranda of reprimand (GOMOR), dated 23 March 2010 and 21 May 2010, or transfer of the GOMORs to the restricted folder of her official military personnel file (OMPF). The GOMORs are properly filed and counsel did not provide substantial evidence showing the GOMORs served their intended purpose and that their transfer to the restricted...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018863

    Original file (20140018863.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 11 May 2012, the applicant requested that the GOMOR be filed in his Military Personnel Records Jacket or completely expunged “as per the imposing official's discretion after seeing supporting documentation.” The applicant stated: a. The letter indicated that in accordance with Army Regulation 600-37, the DASEB will only consider appeals and petitions for active Army, Reserve, and Army National...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022205

    Original file (20130022205.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 July 2007, the applicant was reprimanded via GOMOR from the Commanding General (CG), Headquarters, U.S. Army Special Forces Command (Airborne) Fort Bragg, NC. On 6 December 2007, the CG directed the GOMOR be filed in the applicant's AMHRR. Army Regulation 600-37 (Unfavorable Information) provides, in pertinent part, that an administrative memorandum of reprimand may be issued by an individual's commander, by superiors in the chain of command, and by any general officer or officer...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019581

    Original file (20110019581.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, removal of a General Officer Memorandum of Reprimand (GOMOR), dated 11 March 2010, from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) or in the alternative, transfer of the GOMOR to the restricted section of his OMPF. A memorandum of reprimand may be filed in a Soldier's OMPF only upon the order of a general officer-level authority and is to be filed in the performance section. The GOMOR was correctly filed.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002080743C070215

    Original file (2002080743C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    When the police officer botched the first test the applicant asked that Captain (CPT) G____, who was known to already be in the building, be allowed to witness the test, but the police officer recorded the incident as a refusal. He also recommends that the GOMOR be removed. There is no evidence that the applicant was ever charged with refusing to take a breath test.