Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019672
Original file (20120019672.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  4 June 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120019672 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his military records to show he and his current spouse elected not to participate in Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage.

2.  The applicant states:

* during his pre-separation counseling he was provided a worksheet showing the cost of SBP and an estimation of his retirement pay
* he was not made aware of reduced SBP rates or alternate civilian survivor programs
* he was given his SBP documents during final out-processing 
* he has purchased Veterans Group Life Insurance (VGLI)

3.  The applicant provides:

* An Estimate of Retired Pay Worksheet
* his Retiree Account Statement 
* two pages of a five-page United Services Automobile Association (USAA) Life Insurance Policy
* two undated, unnotarized personal statements

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's military service records show he enlisted in the Regular Army on 18 September 1986 and he retired on 31 December 2011.
2.  The applicant submitted:

	a.  an undated, unnotarized Estimate of Retired Pay Worksheet wherein SBP was calculated to cost $334.00.  It also shows the annuity would be 55 percent of his base pay;

   b.  a Retiree Account Statement, dated 9 April 2012, which shows in the SBP Coverage section he checked "you have paid 3 months towards 360 months of paid up RC/SBP coverage.  Once you have paid at least 360 months towards your coverage and turn age 70, your cost will be terminated but your coverage will remain active";

	c.  a DD Form 2656 (Data for Payment of Retired Personnel), dated 1 August 2011, which he signed and submitted indicating that he elected full SBP coverage for his spouse and children;

	d.  item 30a (Spouse Signature) of the applicant's DD Form 2656 does not contain the signature of the applicant's spouse indicating that she concurred with the SBP election he made.  However, her concurrence was not required because the applicant opted for full SBP coverage;  

	e.  two pages of a five-page USAA Life Insurance Policy which is signed and dated 3 August 2012.  It also shows the death benefit and premiums. 

	f.  an unnotarized, undated statement from the applicant to Mr. H---h, indicating that he had alternate coverage in the form of VGLI which was effective 
1 May 2012 and a USAA policy which was purchased on 3 August 2012; and 

	g.  an undated, unnotarized statement from his spouse, requesting SBP coverage be terminated in favor of commercially available insurance coverage being available.

3.  Public Law 92-425, enacted 21 September 1972, established the SBP.  The SBP provided that military members could elect to have their retired pay reduced to provide for an annuity after death to surviving dependents. 

4.  Public Law 99-145, enacted 8 November 1985 but effective 1 March 1986, required a spouse’s written concurrence for a retiring member’s election that provides less than the maximum spouse coverage.

5.  Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation, volume 7B, chapter 43, provides guidance on SBP elections.  This chapter states, in pertinent part, that effective 1 March 1986, a married member is enrolled with spouse coverage on full retired pay at the time of retirement unless that spouse has concurred in writing to another election requested by the member.  When the spouse’s concurrence is required, the signature indicating concurrence must be corroborated by one or more witnesses.  This chapter also states, in pertinent part, that the Secretary of the Military Department concerned (or designee) may correct any election or any change or revocation of an election when the Secretary considers it necessary to correct an administrative error.

6.  Public Law 105-85, enacted 18 November 1997, established the option to terminate SBP participation.  Retirees have a 1-year period, beginning on the second anniversary of the date on which their retired pay started to withdraw from the SBP.  The spouse’s concurrence is required.  No premiums will be refunded to those who opt to disenroll.  The effective date of termination is the first day of the first calendar month following the month in which the election is received by the Secretary concerned.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's request to be disenrolled from SBP due to his misunderstanding of the program’s costs and benefits was carefully considered and found to be insufficient in merit.

2.  The evidence shows, on 1 August 2011, the applicant elected to participate in the SBP and to provide full coverage for his spouse and children as evidenced by the absence of the spouse's signature.  The spouse's concurrence is required when the retiring service member elects less than full coverage, which means the spouse’s concurrence, was not required in the applicant's case.  

3.  The evidence of record shows the applicant's coverage began on 1 January 2012.  However, he did not attempt to disenroll until he obtained VGLI and USAA insurance policies, in May 2012 and August 2012, respectively.  

4.  The applicant became eligible to draw retired pay on 1 January 2012.  Therefore, he will have a 1-year period beginning on 1 January 2014 in which to terminate his SBP enrollment.  He is encouraged to contact the nearest Retirement Services Officer prior to making his decision for more information.  

5.  In view of the above, the applicant’s request should not be granted.  





BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
      
      
      
      _____________X___________
                CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120019672



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120019672



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004968

    Original file (20130004968.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    was deceased as of 3 June 2006 * it appears he failed to notify DFAS (however, DFAS indicated they had been notified) * he has since remarried and would like to continue his benefit plan for his current spouse * DFAS continued to collect payments all this time (however, DFAS indicated they had not been collecting spouse premiums but had been erroneously collecting child premiums) d. a DD Form 2656, undated by the applicant, which shows; * he indicated his current coverage was spouse and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002294

    Original file (20130002294.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He elected spouse only coverage based on the full amount of retired pay with RCSBP Option B (coverage at age 60). Records show that in December 2001 the applicant was notified of his eligibility for retired pay upon application at age 60. He elected spouse only coverage based on the full amount of retired pay with RCSBP Option B (coverage at age 60) and the applicant, his spouse, and a witness signed the document.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025215

    Original file (20110025215.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record and he did not provide any evidence that shows he was misinformed of his options under the SBP. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. The Board wants the applicant and all others concerned to know that this action in no way diminishes the sacrifices made by the applicant in service to the United States during the Global War on Terrorism.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018353

    Original file (20140018353.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Section XI (Certification) item 30 (Member) states, "Also, I have been counseled that I can terminate SBP participation, with my spouse's written concurrence, within 1-year after the second anniversary of commencement of retired pay. He provided a DD Form 2656-2 requesting termination of his SBP coverage. The evidence of record shows the applicant submitted a DD Form 2656 wherein he elected to participate in the SBP for spouse/children based on the full amount in the presence of an RSO counselor.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070000145

    Original file (20070000145.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that he elected not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Public Law 99-145, enacted 8 November 1985 but effective 1 March 1986, required a spouse’s written concurrence for a retiring member’s election that provides less than the maximum spouse coverage. The available evidence clearly shows that the applicant elected to participate in the SBP to provide full coverage for his spouse.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020819

    Original file (20110020819.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member's 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. The applicant's DD Form 1883 shows he enrolled in the RCSBP for spouse and children coverage on 10 December 1996. He is further advised...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002188

    Original file (20140002188.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her records to show she elected not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) upon application for retired pay at age 60. The applicant states, in effect, she has no spouse. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * showing the applicant timely completed a DD Form 2656 electing not to participate in the SBP * showing DFAS timely received and processed the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080017772

    Original file (20080017772.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states that he and his spouse were not properly informed that the SBP cost was monthly and not yearly. The author stated that the applicant was requesting cancellation of his SBP election. The evidence of record shows that the applicant retired on 31 July 2008.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009505

    Original file (20140009505.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his military records to show he and his spouse elected not to participate in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). This chapter states, in pertinent part, that effective 1 March 1986, a married member is enrolled with spouse coverage based on full retired pay at the time of retirement unless that spouse has concurred in writing to another election requested by the member. The evidence shows that on 2 December 2013, the applicant elected to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012354

    Original file (20080012354.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    This document further shows that Section XI (SBP Spouse Concurrence) is absent any indication the applicant’s spouse concurred with the SBP election made by the applicant or that she received information from the Retirement Services Officer (RSO) that explained the actions available and the effects of those options. The applicant contends, in effect, that his records should be corrected to show that he declined participation in the SBP and that all monies that have been collected by the...