Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019602
Original file (20120019602.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	

		BOARD DATE:	  18 June 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120019602 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 4 June 1991 to show the Army Achievement Medal (AAM).

2.  The applicant states in December 2010 he received a letter from the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC), St. Louis, MO indicating he was authorized the AAM.  He is looking to confirm if he is authorized the AAM and if so, under what circumstances it was awarded.

3.  The applicant provides a letter from the NPRC.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Massachusetts Army National Guard (MAARNG) on 16 April 1987.  He completed training and he was awarded military occupational specialty 95B (Military Police).

3.  On 21 November 1990, he was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Desert Shield/Storm.  On 4 June 1991, he was honorably released from active duty at the expiration of his term of service to the control of the MAARNG.  He completed 6 months and 14 days of net active service this period.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time does not show award of the AAM.

4.  A review of his DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) and the remainder of his military personnel record failed to reveal any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the AAM.

5.  He provides a letter from the NPRC, dated 31 December 2010, that lists the AAM among those awards being shipped to the applicant.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the AAM is awarded to members of the Armed Forces of the United States, who while serving in a noncombat area on or after 1 August 1981, distinguished themselves by meritorious service or achievement.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.
  
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant was recommended for or awarded the AAM by proper authority.  Notwithstanding the NPRC letter indicating he was shipped the AAM, it appears an administrative error occurred that authorized the shipment of the AAM.  In the absence of orders or any other corroborating evidence, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120019602



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120019602



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018235

    Original file (20080018235.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Evidence of record shows that the applicant received the 2nd and 3rd award of the AAM on 24 September 1985 and 28 July 1987, respectively. Nevertheless, there is no evidence and the applicant has failed to provide any to show that the date contained on the orders/memorandum awarding him the 2nd and 3rd award of the AAM, Recruiter Badge with gold star, NCO Professional Development Ribbon with number 3 or the Good Conduct Medal are incorrect. _______ _ _XXX______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100016571

    Original file (20100016571.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM). Since he was awarded the Army Achievement Medal while he was in the USAR, this award is not authorized to be recorded on his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003546

    Original file (20140003546.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. The applicant's complete military records are not available for review. Unfortunately, the applicant waited 60+ years after the fact to contest his discharge and there are no documents available to show that his discharge was not properly characterized.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080014179

    Original file (20080014179.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: NGB Form 22; AAM Certificate; 1997 and 1999 Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Forms 214); Installation Management Command (IMCOM) Electronic Mail (e-mail) Message, dated 7 August 2008; Enlisted Promotion Point Worksheet (NGB Form 4100-1-R-E); and 110th Maintenance Company, Massachusetts Army National...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015142

    Original file (20090015142.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show an additional award of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM) and two additional awards of the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM). Evidence of record contains orders that support two awards of the AAM. There is no evidence of record and the applicant did not provide any evidence to show he was awarded a third award of the AAM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005784

    Original file (20110005784.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to add his Army Achievement Medal (AAM) and his qualification with the M-60 Machine Gun. _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021367

    Original file (20130021367.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requested correction of his DD Form 214 to show he was awarded or authorized the AAM (2nd Award), SWASM with 3 bronze service stars, KLM-SA, and KLM-KU. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he is authorized this unit award. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. amending item 13 of his DD Form 214 to add the following awards: * AAM-2 * SWASM with three bronze service stars *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110004029

    Original file (20110004029.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show award of the Army Achievement Medal (AAM) and the Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM). States the Army Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency, and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010677

    Original file (20120010677.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction to his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 3 July 1997 to show award of the: * Meritorious Service Medal (MSM) * Army Commendation Medal (ARCOM) (5th Award) 2. The DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty and will be prepared for all personnel at the time of their retirement, discharge, or release from active duty. As a result, the Board recommends that all...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130002645

    Original file (20130002645.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states all of his awards were not listed on his DD Form 214 at the time of its issuance. It states this medal is authorized to members for service in support of Operation Desert Storm in SWA between 17 January 1991 and 28 February 1991. c. Paragraph 9-15 of Army Regulation 600-8-22 contains guidance for award of the KLM-KU. The evidence of record shows the applicant served in SWA in support of Operation Desert Storm from 23 December 1990 to 20 June 1991 as evidenced by the...