Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019520
Original file (20120019520.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	
		BOARD DATE:	  23 May 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120019520 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart (PH).

2.  The applicant states:

	a.  he served in the Army during the Vietnam Era in 1972; and

	b.  he was injured and feels he should have been awarded the PH.

3.  The applicant provides no additional documents.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the New York Army National Guard (NYARNG) on
9 November 1971 for a period of 6 years.  On 3 March 1972, he entered active duty for training.

3.  The applicant's record contains a DA Form 2173 (Statement of Medical Examination and Duty Status), dated 1 May 1972, that shows he sustained a stress fracture to his right and left heels as a result of running and walking with flat feet while wearing boots during his basic training at Fort Dix, NJ in March 1972.

4.  His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) contains no entry in item 31 (Foreign Service) or item 40 (Wounds).  Additionally, item 41 (Awards and Decorations) does not show he was awarded the PH.

5.  On 6 March 1973, a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) found the applicant unfit for further military service based on his stress fracture injuries.  The PEB recommended his placement on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL) with a 30 percent disability rating.

6.  On 12 March 1973, the applicant concurred with the PEB's findings and recommendation.  The PEB findings and recommendation were approved on 19 March 1973.

7.  The applicant's record does not include any medical treatment record that indicates he was ever treated for a combat-related wound or injury while serving active duty.  Further, there are no orders or documents indicating he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority.

8.  On 23 April 1973, the applicant was retired after completing 1 year, 1 month, and 21 days of total active service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued at that time shows his last duty of assignment was with the Medical Holding Company, Fort Dix.  It does not include the PH among its lists of awards.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) prescribes the Army's awards policy.  Paragraph 2-8 contains the regulatory guidance pertaining to award of the PH.  It states that in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, that the wound required treatment by medical personnel, and a record of this medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.




DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant contends he should be awarded the PH for injuries he sustained while serving on active duty during the Vietnam Era.

2.  The evidence of record confirms the applicant sustained stress fracture injuries to his heels during basic training rendering him unfit for continued service as determined by the PEB.  Accordingly, he was placed on the TDRL with a 30 percent disability rating.  Absent evidence to show he was wounded as a result of enemy action and that he was treated for those wounds by military medical personnel while serving on active duty, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for awarding him the PH.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X__  ___X_____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ________X_______________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120019520



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120019520



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110025122

    Original file (20110025122.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM's military records are not available to the Board for review. The FSM's available military record shows he was inducted into the Army of the United States on 3 August 1966. The applicant is basing his request for award of the PH to his later brother, the FSM, on the Medical Board Summary and informal PEB, dated 12 July and 29 August 1968, which clearly show the FSM suffered a crushing injury to the left hand with lacerations to the left hand necessitating partial amputation and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120010650

    Original file (20120010650.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The FSM was never awarded the Purple Heart for the injury he incurred in Vietnam. The applicant provides: * An undated handwritten account of the FSM's assignment to Vietnam * Honorable Discharge Certificate * Certification of Service, dated 19 October 1971 * DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from Active Duty) for the period ending on 24 September 1974 * Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) application for medical benefits, dated 30 April 1991 * Death Certificate, dated 19 December 2010 *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040002104C070208

    Original file (20040002104C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 FEBRUARY 2005 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20040002104 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The evidence in this case is far from conclusive. Two medical reports, the earliest in October 1968, indicate that the applicant’s injuries resulted from an auto accident in Vietnam.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060006947C070205

    Original file (20060006947C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    While there is evidence to show that the applicant was injured in Vietnam, there is no indication that the injuries were the result of enemy action. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned by awarding him the RVNGC w/Palm Unit Citation and two bronze service stars for wear on his already awarded VSM.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120003593

    Original file (20120003593.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-40 establishes the Army PDES and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating. Once a determination of physical unfitness is made, the physical evaluation board rates all disabilities using the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities. Subsequent to his retirement and over the years, the VA awarded him...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03636

    Original file (BC 2014 03636.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Special Order Number AC-41295 reflects the applicant was relieved from active duty on 27 December 1972 and placed on the temporary disability retired list (TDRL) on 28 December 1972 in the grade of airman first class. On 8 December 2014, AFPC/DPAPP advised the applicant that after a complete review of his official military record and the documentation he provided, they were able to verify and confirm his boots on ground foreign service time at Phan Rang Air Base, Republic of Vietnam, from...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018796

    Original file (20080018796.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 July 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080018796 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows that he served in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) from 30 October 1967 through 7 July 1968. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the applicant the PH for being wounded in action in the RVN on 22 May 1968; b. awarding...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003111C070206

    Original file (20050003111C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    This medal was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. Individuals who had qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and were evacuated prior to completing six months of service due to wounds resulting from hostile action were entitled to award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001047

    Original file (20150001047.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military service records to show he sustained an injury on 25 October 1967 and was awarded the Purple Heart. A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal any orders or other evidence that shows he was awarded a second award of the Purple Heart. The applicant's request for correction of his military service records to show he sustained wounds/injuries on 25 October 1967 and was awarded a second award of the Purple Heart was...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140014459

    Original file (20140014459.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states: * he was told by those in command that he was not authorized a PH because he was wounded as a result of friendly fire * he meets the regulations for the PH under friendly fire pursuant to Title 10 U.S. Code (USC), Section 1129 (Purple Heart: members killed or wounded in action by friendly fire) * when he left Vietnam, his local command informed him they had lost his medical records and he also has post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) * he also tried to find reports or...