IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 7 May 2013
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120019283
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show the last two digits of his social security number (SSN) as "95" versus "59."
2. He states the last two digits of his SSN are reversed.
3. He provides his DD Form 214 and social security card.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 11 May 1966. He was honorably discharged on 15 July 1966 and credited with 2 months and 5 days of active duty service.
3. A review of his record shows the only two documents containing an SSN are his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) and DA Form 3027WS (U.S. Army Request for National Agency Check Worksheet), dated 12 May 1966. Both of these documents show the last two digits of his SSN as "95." All other documents in his record contain a service number.
4. Item 32 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 shows the last two digits of his SSN as "59."
5. His social security card shows the last two digits of his SSN as "95."
6. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) states the DD Form 214 is a summary of a Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active duty service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
It appears the applicant's service number was used throughout his period of service. However, his DA Form 20, DA Form 3027WS, and social security card confirm the last two digits of his SSN are "95." Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his DD Form 214 to show this SSN.
BOARD VOTE:
____x___ ___x____ ____x___ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all
Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 to show his SSN as it appears on his social security card.
_______ _ _x______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120019283
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120019283
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120005079
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record shows the applicant's SSN was listed with the last two digits as "74" when his DA Form 20 was created upon his entry on active duty. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct his DD Form 214 to show his correct SSN. _______ _ __X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011126
His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) created upon his entry on active duty shows his SSN with the last two digits as 45 and his DOB as 10 January 19xx. The evidence of record shows the applicant's SSN was listed with the last two digits as 95 upon his entry on active duty. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to correcting his DD Form 214 to show his: * DOB as 1 February 19xx * his last duty assignment as HHD, 5th Battalion, 30th...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026205
The evidence of record shows upon his initial enlistment on 31 July 1963 he completed a DD Form 398 wherein he listed his SSN with the numbers "69" as the last two digits. The evidence of record shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: * deleting from item 3 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 28 July 1967 the SSN ending with "96" and replacing it with the SSN...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011496
Item 3 (SSN) of his DD Form 214 shows his SSN with the last four digits as "09xx." DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: The evidence of record shows the applicant listed his SSN with the last four digits as "90xx" upon his induction into the Army. Therefore, it would be appropriate at this time to correct the injustice by correcting his DD Form 214 to show the correct last four digits of his SSN as shown on his Social Security Card.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013713
BOARD DATE: 10 January 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110013713 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. A review of the documents contained in the applicant's military personnel records shows the seventh digit of his SSN both as 6 and 3 on several documents throughout his tenure of service: * a DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) prepared on 14 January 1966 and last reviewed by the applicant on 2 July 1968 * Special Orders Number 137, issued by Headquarters, U.S. Army Training...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006127
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110013995
The applicant's record shows, in conjunction with his induction into the Army of the United States (AUS), he completed a DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History) on 9 October 1966 wherein he listed his SSN with the last four digits as "XX04." Item 3 of the DD Form 214 he was issued shows his SSN with the last four digits as "XX07." The evidence of record shows the applicant listed his SSN with the last four digits as "XX04" upon his induction into the AUS.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005775
The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his complete social security number (SSN) and award of the Purple Heart. His DA Form 20 shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal and the records show he participated in two campaigns during his service in Vietnam. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110015052
The last digit 7 is shown on every document contained in his OMPF until Special Orders Number 278 was published on 20 November 1968, releasing him from active duty, effective 12 December 1968. The applicants DD Form 214 shows 4 as the last digit of his SSN. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 3 on his DD Form 214 to show the SSN shown on his Social Security Card.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011630
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). He states his DD Form 214 shows the last digit of his SSN as "7," but it should show "9." The evidence of record shows the last digit of his SSN was recorded incorrectly on a DA Form 2139 and this error was transcribed onto his DD Form 214 for the period ending 19 May 1967.