Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019075
Original file (20120019075.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  28 May 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120019075 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show she retired by reason of disability in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 instead of specialist (SPC)/E-4.

2.  The applicant states:

* when she was honorably discharged for disability at Fort Wainwright, AK, she went to the transition center to out-process
* she left Fort Wainwright on 30 days of permissive temporary duty to bring her children back
* she did not sign her DD Form 214
* she was promotable to SGT as her Enlisted Record Brief (ERB) shows
* the regulation is clear in that promotable Soldiers separated for disability are paid severance pay at the higher grade

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214
* ERB
* commander's performance statement
* DA Form 3349 (Physical Profile)
* disciplinary action statement
* 
DA Form 705 (Army Physical Fitness Test Scorecard)
* November 2004 leave and earnings statement
* permanent change of station orders
* separation orders

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 18 March 1997 and she held military occupational specialties 42A (Human Resources Specialist).  She served through multiple reenlistments in a variety of stateside and overseas assignments and she was promoted to SPC/E-4 on 28 March 1997.

3.  She was assigned to Detachment A, 203rd Personnel Services Battalion, Fort Wainwright, AK.  Her ERB, dated 7 December 2004, shows she was a promotable SPC with 838 points as of August 2002.

4.  On 3 March 2005, an informal physical evaluation board (PEB) convened and found her medical condition prevented her from performing the duties required of her grade and specialty and determined that she was physically unfit.  She was rated under the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities and granted a 10-percent disability rating.  The PEB recommended her separation with entitlement to severance pay.  She concurred.

5.  On 30 March 2005, Headquarters, 203rd Personnel Services Battalion, Fort Wainwright, AK, published Orders 089-203 ordering her reassignment to the Transition Center for separation processing effective 6 June 2005 and separation by reason of disability effective 6 June 2005 with entitlement to severance pay in pay grade E-4 based on 8 years, 2 months, and 19 days of active service.

6.  She was honorably discharged on 6 June 2005 under the provisions of chapter 4 of Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) due to disability.  Her DD Form 214 shows in:

* item 4a (Grade, Rate, or Rank) – "SPC"
* item 4b (Pay Grade) – "E-4"
* item 12f (Effective Date of Pay Grade) – "1997  03  18"

7.  Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) establishes the standardized policy for preparing and distributing the DD Form 214.  Chapter 2 contains guidance for preparation of the DD Form 214 and states that items 4a and 4b show the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at time of separation and are obtained from the Soldier's records (promotion or reduction orders).

8.  Military Personnel Message Number 05-084, dated 4 April 2005, subject:  Enlisted Eligibility Regarding Enlisted Soldiers Undergoing Evaluation by the MOS/Medical Retention Board (MMRB), Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) or PEB, references Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions) and Headquarters, Department of the Army, memorandum, dated 28 March 2005, and states Soldiers who are on a promotion list at the time of retirement for disability will be retired for disability at the promotion list grade.  Further, the Soldier will be promoted to the designated grade effective the day before placement on the Retired List.  Additionally, under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1212, Soldiers who are on a promotion list at the time of separation for disability with entitlement to disability severance pay will be paid such compensation at the promotion list grade.  Further, the Soldier will be promoted to the designated grade effective on the Soldier's separation date.  The policy pertains to Soldiers of all ranks.

9.  Headquarters, Department of the Army, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Personnel, has clarified that the above policy is effective with the revised publication of Army Regulation 600-8-19 in January 2006.

10.  Army Regulation 600-8-19 provides for the promotion and reduction of enlisted Soldiers.  Paragraph 1-20(d) of the version published on 10 January 2006 states that under the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1212, Soldiers who are on a promotion list at the time of separation for disability with entitlement to disability severance pay will be paid such compensation at the promotion list grade.  Further, the Soldier will be promoted to the designated grade effective on the Soldier's separation date.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant served on active duty from 18 March 1997 to 6 June 2005.  She was a promotable SPC/E-4 at the time of her disability discharge.  By law, at the time she was separated Soldiers on a promotion list at the time of separation for disability with entitlement to disability severance pay would be paid such compensation at the promotion list grade.  However, the regulatory guidance to promote the Soldier to the designated grade effective on the Soldier's separation date did not become effective until after the applicant separated.

2.  Therefore, she is entitled to correction of her separation orders to show she was discharged for disability effective 6 June 2005 and is entitled to severance pay at the pay grade of SGT/E-5 effective that date.  However, there is no error on her DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

___x____  ___x____  ____x___  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by:

* amending Orders 089-203, issued by Headquarters, 203rd Personnel Services Battalion, Fort Wainwright, AK, dated 30 March 2005, to show entitlement to severance pay in pay grade E-5 vice E-4 based on 8 years, 2 months, and 19 days of active service
* paying her the difference of any severance pay due as a result of this correction

2.  The Board further determined that the evidence presented was insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief.  As a result, the Board recommends 

denial of so much of the application that pertains to correcting her DD Form 214 to show her rank and grade as sergeant/E-5.



      ___________x____________
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120019075



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120019075



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021246

    Original file (20130021246.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests: a. correction of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show/add: * her rank/grade as specialist (SPC)/E-4 vice private first class (PFC)/E-3 * her date of rank (DOR) to SPC of 27 September 2013 * her net active service as 3 years, 6 months, and 21 days vice 3 years, 5 months, and 10 days * the Army Achievement Medal b. correction of her separation orders and discharge certificate to show her rank as SPC. The applicant provides: *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015152

    Original file (20140015152.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states his DD Form 214 shows his rank and grade as specialist (SPC)/E-4, but his separation orders shows he was authorized severance pay in pay grade E-5. His Enlisted Record Brief (ERB) shows he was promoted to the rank/grade of SPC/E-4 effective 1 September 2009. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing he was promoted to SGT/E-5 effective 26 February 2013 and by amending his DD Form 214 to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110022224

    Original file (20110022224.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of her military records to show her correct rank. The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) she was issued at the time shows in: * Item 4a (Grade, Rate or Rank) the entry "PFC" * Item 4b (Pay Grade) the entry "E03" * Item 12i (Effective Date of Pay Grade) the entry "2009 06 11" (11 June 2009) 4. While undergoing physical disability processing, she met the requirements for promotion to SPC on 11 June 2011 and a DA Form 4187...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090014612

    Original file (20090014612.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests physical disability retirement. There is no evidence the applicant was diagnosed with an injury that required processing by a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) or a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) during his period of active duty. The evidence also shows he continued to perform military duties up to his discharge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130014758

    Original file (20130014758.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The regulation states in: a. Paragraph 1-20a - Soldiers who are pending referral to a Military Occupational Specialty Medical Retention Board under Army Regulation 40-400 (Patient Administration) or referral to a medical evaluation board (MEB) or a PEB under Army Regulation 635-40 will not be denied promotion (if already promotable) on the basis of medical disqualification if they are otherwise qualified for promotion. His DD Form 214 currently shows he was retired due to permanent...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006597

    Original file (20110006597.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Soldiers being medically separated from the military are promoted on their last day in the military. Chapter 2 contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214 and states that items 4a and 4b show the active duty grade or rank and pay grade at time of separation and are obtained from the Soldier's records (promotion or reduction orders). Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1212 states upon separation from his armed force under section 1203 or 1206 of this title, a member is entitled to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060005260C070205

    Original file (20060005260C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military service records contain a copy of her DD Form 214 that shows she was honorably released from active duty based upon completion of required active service on 23 July 2005. The applicant's military service records contain a copy of an ERB, dated 29 June 2005. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant's DD Form 214 to show this award.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018080

    Original file (20140018080.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 7 July 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140018080 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 600-8-19 (Enlisted Promotions and Reductions), paragraph 1-20f, states per the provisions of Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1212, Soldiers who are on a promotion list at the time of separation for disability with entitlement to disability severance pay will be paid such compensation at the promotion list grade. Based on the foregoing evidence, his records...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110020569

    Original file (20110020569.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his military records to show his retired rank as specialist (SPC), pay grade E-4. He was placed on the retired list effective 30 March 2009, in the rank of SPC, pay grade E-4. Further, the Soldier will be promoted to the designated grade effective the Soldiers separation date.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100017530

    Original file (20100017530.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states, in effect, that his DD Form 214 incorrectly shows his service in Iraq from 12 August 2005 through 11 August 2006 instead of showing 12 August 2005 through 5 December 2006. Section - I (Assignment Information) of his ERB, prepared on 20 March 2007, shows he was deployed to Iraq for the period 15 August 2005 through 6 December 2006. Therefore, item 12f of his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show he completed 7 years, 1 month, and 20 days of foreign service and item 18 should be...