Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120019022
Original file (20120019022.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

	
		BOARD DATE:	  2 May 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120019022 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests a medical retirement.

2.  The applicant states he should have been retired due to a stomach disorder and the "experimental" surgery that went bad.  He recently became aware that he could have/should have been medically retired due to his stomach condition, but instead he had to leave the Army due to health problems with no benefits.  He was serving in Germany with a pending reassignment as a first sergeant at a basic training command but due to the problems with his stomach he was discharged.  He should be compensated for this career loss.

3.  The applicant provides:

* DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period
8 September 1953 through 7 September 1956
* National Archives and Records Administration (NA) Form 13038 (Certification of Military Service) for the period 15 June 1959 through
29 March 1962
* DD Form 214 for the period 30 March 1962 through 29 February 1968

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error 

or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 8 September 1953 for a period of 3 years.  He completed training and was awarded military occupational specialty 130.00 (Armor Basic).  He was honorably released from active duty on 7 September 1956 at the expiration of his term of service and he was transferred to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) to complete his remaining Reserve obligation. He again enlisted on 15 June 1959 with an immediate reenlistment on 30 March 1962.

3.  Other than his separation Standard Form (SF) 89 (Report of Medical History) and SF 88 (Report of Medical Examination), the applicant's service medical records are believed to be on permanent loan to the Department of Veterans Affairs and are not available for review.

4.  His 16 February 1968 SF 89 shows he had a vagotomy and a pyloroplasty on 11 December 1967 with no reported residuals.

	a.  Vagotomy is a treatment option for chronic duodenal ulcers by surgical cutting of the vagus nerve to reduce acid secretion in the stomach.

	b.  Pyloroplasty is a surgical procedure in which the lower portion of the stomach, the pylorus, is cut and resutured, to relax the muscle and widen the opening into the intestine.

5.  His 16 February 1968 SF 88 does not show any residuals from his vagotomy and pyloroplasty except for the surgical scar.  He was found to be qualified for separation.

6.  On 29 February 1968, the applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel) by reason of early separation of overseas returnee.

7.  Army Regulation 40-501 (Standards of Medical Fitness), paragraph 3-3b(1) provides that for an individual to be found unfit by reason of physical disability, he/she must be unable to perform the duties of his/her office, grade, rank or rating.

8.  Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation) establishes the Army physical disability evaluation system (PDES) and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his office, grade, rank, or rating.  It states:

	a.  There is no legal requirement in arriving at the rated degree of incapacity to rate a physical condition which is not in itself considered disqualifying for military service when a Soldier is found unfit because of another condition that is disqualifying.  Only the unfitting conditions or defects and those which contribute to unfitness will be considered in arriving at the rated degree of incapacity warranting retirement or separation for disability.

	b.  In paragraph 3-1 that the mere presence of impairment does not, of itself, justify a finding of unfitness because of physical disability.  In each case, it is necessary to compare the nature and degree of physical disability present with the requirements of the duties the member reasonably may be expected to perform because of his/her office, rank, grade or rating.

	c.  In paragraph 3-2b(1) that disability compensation is not an entitlement acquired by reason of service-incurred illness or injury; rather, it is provided to Soldiers whose service is interrupted and he can no longer continue to reasonably perform because of a physical disability incurred or aggravated in service.

	d.  In paragraph 3-2b(2) that when a member is being separated by reason other than physical disability, his/her continued performance of duty creates a presumption of fitness which can be overcome only by clear and convincing evidence that he/she was unable to perform his/her duties or that acute grave illness or injury or other deterioration of physical condition, occurring immediately prior to or coincident with separation, rendered the member unfit.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant has not provided and the available records do not contain any evidence that he was suffering from any medical condition that warranted 

processing through the PDES for a medical discharge or retirement.  At the time of separation his physical examination by competent medical authority determined the applicant was medically fit for retention or appropriate separation. Accordingly, the applicant was separated from active duty for reasons other than physical disability.

2.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X___  ___X_____  ____X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



	__________X_____________
	         CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120019022



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120019022



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140009343

    Original file (20140009343.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his record to show he was determined to be unfit by the physical disability evaluation system (PDES) and retired by reason of physical disability. Except for a member who was previously found unfit and retained in a limited assignment duty status in accordance with chapter 6 of this regulation, such a member should not be referred to the PDES unless his or her physical defects raise substantial doubt that he or she is fit to continue to perform the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015605

    Original file (20140015605.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no indication in his military records that shows: * he was issued a permanent physical profile * he was diagnosed with a medical condition that failed retention standards in accordance with AR 40-501 * he suffered an illness or an injury that rendered him unable to perform the duties required of his grade or military specialty * he was referred to the Army Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) and/or was found to have an unfitting medical condition 9. The Army must find that...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100026557

    Original file (20100026557.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    d. A DD Form 2808 (Report of Medical Examination) shows the reporting physician indicated: * the applicant's psychiatric and stomach conditions were considered normal * the applicant's indigestion and stomach problems were minimal (gastro esophageal reflux disease (GERD), for which he was taking no medications) * the applicant was previously diagnosed with PTSD but required no use of psychiatric medication for over 3-4 years * the applicant did not object to his PTSD and stomach condition...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050013215C070206

    Original file (20050013215C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He further states that the information given in the ABCMR's finding regarding neurological involvement was incorrect because it failed to acknowledge that leg pain from a back injury is always neurological in origin. Army Regulation 635-40 establishes the Army Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his or her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130003387

    Original file (20130003387.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Army must find that a service member is physically unfit to reasonably perform his or her duties and assign an appropriate disability rating before he or she can be medically retired or separated. The Army rates only conditions determined to be physically unfitting at the time of discharge which disqualify the Soldier from further military service. The applicant and counsel now believe he should have received a medical discharge or medical retirement for his various medical conditions...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130018507

    Original file (20130018507.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    BOARD DATE: 15 July 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130018507 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of the records of his deceased father, a former service member (FSM), by: * upgrading the FSM's character of service to honorable * showing the FSM was discharged due to a medical condition * restoring the FSM's 255 days of lost time * crediting the FSM with a full 6 years of service * showing the FSM's pes planus (flat feet) condition was in the line of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090006439

    Original file (20090006439.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no evidence of record and the applicant has not provided any evidence, that he was ever referred to the Army’s PDES for disability processing. In order to justify correction of a military record, the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. ___________x_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012233

    Original file (20080012233.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The VA, however, is not required by law to determine medical unfitness for further military service. The evidence of record confirms that the PEB determined that only two of the applicant's diagnosed conditions were unfitting and thereby ratable. The evidence also shows the applicant's PDES processing was accomplished in accordance with the applicable law and regulation, and that the applicant concurred with the findings and recommendations of the PEB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016515

    Original file (20110016515.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The record shows the PEB determined the applicant was unfit for further service and granted her a 20 percent disability rating. The applicant’s complete service medical records were not available for review in this case; however, contrary to her contention that she was diagnosed as bi-polar with PTSD and manic depression, the available evidence of record shows she was found to have an atypical depressive disorder. The existing evidence of record and the independent evidence provided by the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006120

    Original file (20140006120.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant, the widow of a deceased former service member (FSM), requests reconsideration of her previous request to correct the FSM's records to show he was medically discharged vice discharged for expiration of term of service in 1984. These notes also show the FSM's previous surgical history included two stents in 1996, basal cell carcinoma in 1997, dual lumen dialysis catheter in 2006, left upper extremity AV fistula in 2007, and removal of the temporary dialysis catheter in 2007; g....