IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 7 May 2013
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120018934
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests, in effect, an upgrade of his Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD).
2. The applicant states he passed the audition for the Army Band after auditioning with the Band Master at Fort Ord, California; however, when he started the enlistment process at the Los Angeles California Military Entrance Processing Station (MEPS), recruiting errors resulted in his enlisting in military occupational specialty (MOS) 19K. He claims the recruiter told him there were no openings for the Army Band but he could enlist and change his MOS after he was in. He states that once in, he was assigned to a COHORT unit and could not change his MOS. He states his inability to fulfill his dream of being an entertainer resulted in a Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) that resulted in his excessive use of alcohol and often engaging in arguments with noncommissioned officers (NCOs). He states he tried to resolve these issues through the chaplain to no avail. He claims he was allowed to participate in some music activities and was recommended for the Soldiers Show; however, his commander did not allow this.
3. The applicant provides a self-authored statement and an unofficial transcript from Los Angeles Harbor College in support of his request.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicants failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicants failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2. The record shows the enlisted in the Regular Army on 18 April 1989, for a period of 3 years. In connection with his enlistment, the applicant completed a DA Form 3286-60/7 (Statement for Enlistment U.S. Army Enlistment Options) in which he signed a statement acknowledging that he understood he could not submit a personnel action for any volunteer program until the final (third) year of assignment to a COHORT unit. The applicant authenticated this statement with his signature on 18 April 1989.
3. The applicant successfully completed basic combat training at Fort Knox, Kentucky and advanced individual training (AIT) in MOS 19K (Armor Crewman) at Fort Carson, Colorado. He was advanced to private first class (PFC)/E-3 on 18 April 1991, and this is the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty.
4. The applicants disciplinary history shows his acceptance of nonjudicial punishment under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) on 19 March 1991, for being absent without leave (AWOL) from 7 to 8 February 1991. The punishment imposed included his reduction to private/E-2. The record also shows he accrued 30 days of time lost due to military confinement between 3 July and 1 August 1991.
5. The applicants record is void of medical records that indicate he was suffering from PTSD or from any other disqualifying medical condition while serving on active duty.
6. The record contains a Report of Result of Trial memorandum that shows on 30 September 1991, a special court-martial (SPCM) found the applicant guilty of violating Articles 86 (AWOL), 112a (Wrongful use of Cocaine), and 123a (Uttering of worthless checks) of the UCMJ. The resulting sentence was reduction to private/E-1, confinement for 75 days, and a BCD.
7. SPCM Order Number 8, issued by Headquarters, 7th Infantry Division (Light), Fort Ord, California, dated 21 January 1993, directed, Article 71c having been complied with, that portion of the sentence pertaining to a BCD be duly executed.
8. On 16 February 1992, the applicant was discharged as a result of a court-martial with a BCD. The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) he was issued at the time shows he completed 3 years, 9 months, and 1 day of creditable active service with 30 days of time lost due to confinement.
9. There is no evidence indicating the applicant petitioned the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) for an upgrade of his discharge within that boards
15 years statute of limitations.
10. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 3 prescribes the policies and procedures for separating members with a dishonorable or a BCD. It stipulates that a Soldier will be given a BCD pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or a special court-martial and that the appellate review must be completed and affirmed before the sentence is ordered duly executed.
11. Court-martial convictions stand as adjudged or modified by appeal through the judicial process. In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the ABCMR is not empowered to set aside a conviction. Rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial process and then only if clemency is determined to be appropriate. Clemency is an act of mercy or instance of leniency to moderate the severity of the punishment imposed.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's contention that his BCD should be upgraded based on recruiter error and the impact of PTSD on his behavior at the time of his discharge has been carefully considered. However, by law, any redress by this Board of the finality of a court-martial conviction under the UCMJ is prohibited. The Board is only empowered to change a discharge if clemency is determined to be appropriate to moderate the severity of the sentence imposed.
2. The evidence of record reveals no error or injustice related to the applicant's court-martial and/or his subsequent discharge. Further, the evidence of record confirms the applicant acknowledged his understanding that he would not be allowed to submit personnel actions until the third year of his COHORT assignment in a DA Form 3286-60/7 he completed during his enlistment processing.
3. In addition, there is no evidence of record or independent evidence submitted by the applicant that shows recruiter or enlistment processing error in conjunction with his enlistment. In addition, there is no evidence that he suffered from a PTSD or any other medically disqualifying condition at the time he committed the misconduct that resulted in his court-martial and BCD. Therefore, based on the gravity of the offenses resulting in his SPCM conviction and BCD, his overall record of service is not sufficiently meritorious to support clemency and/or an upgrade of his discharge.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____x___ ___x____ ____x___ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ _x______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120018934
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120018934
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002076969C070215
The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. APPLICANT STATES : The applicant has offered no argument or evidence in support of his request for an upgrade of his discharge. On 14 October 1997, the Army Disciplinary Barracks published orders indicating that the applicant’s finding and sentence, as approved by the convening authority, had been affirmed and that discharge was directed.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022917
The applicant, through civilian counsel, requests that the Board exercise clemency and upgrade his bad conduct discharge (BCD). Counsel requests that the Board exercise clemency and upgrade the applicant's BCD. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070008643
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 11 December 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070008643 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The applicant's records show that he was discharged on 21 December 1972 The DD Form 214 he was issued shows that he was discharged under the provisions of chapter 11 of Army Regulation 635-200 with a Bad Conduct...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110024426
The applicant requests upgrade of his bad conduct discharge (BCD) to a general discharge under honorable conditions. Headquarters, 1st Infantry Division (Mechanized) and Fort Riley, Kansas, Special Court-Martial Order Number 2, dated 27 January 1995, confirmed the applicant's court-martial sentence was affirmed. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, provides that the Board is not empowered to set aside a conviction.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016779
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. His record is void of documentation showing the specific reason for his reduction. His conviction and sentence by general court-martial were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which he was convicted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010486
United States Army Training Center, Infantry and Fort Ord, California, Special Court-Martial Orders Number 124, dated 19 May 1971, noted that only so much of the approved sentences as provided for a BCD, confinement at hard labor for 6 months, forfeiture of $70.00 pay per months for 6 months and reduction to pay grade E-1 had been affirmed. In view of the foregoing, on 3 September 2014 the Secretary of Defense directed the Service Discharge Review Boards (DRBs) and Service Boards for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080018411
Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). On 24 September 1966, nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against the applicant for his failure to prepare for guard duty. Conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations, and the discharge appropriately characterizes the misconduct for which the applicant was convicted.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090008245
The applicant was sentenced to forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement for 10 months, and to be discharged from the Army with a BCD. In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552, the authority under which this Board acts, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records is not empowered to change a discharge due to matters which should have been raised in the appellate process, rather it is only empowered to change the severity of the sentence imposed in the court-martial...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090012575
The DD Form 214 the applicant was issued shows he completed 11 years, 1 month, and 15 days of active military service. On 22 September 2000, the Army Discharge Review Board denied the applicant's request to upgrade his bad conduct discharge. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030553
The DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) issued to the applicant upon his discharge on 6 May 1987 shows he was separated under the provisions of chapter 3, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), by reason of court-martial with a BCD. There is no indication the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. In accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552,...