Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018842
Original file (20120018842.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  7 May 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120018842 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests his award of the Bronze Star Medal be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) with an effective date of 20 February 1973.

2.  The applicant states he would like to have this award added to his 
DD Form 214.

3.  The applicant provides his:

* DD Form 214 with an effective date of 27 February 1970
* DD Form 214 with an effective date of 20 February 1973
* Bronze Star Medal Certificate, dated 8 October 1970

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 16 April 1969, he enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years.  He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty 11B (Infantryman).

3.  On 19 November 1969, he was assigned to the 2nd Battalion, 20th Infantry in the Republic of Vietnam.

4.  On 27 February 1970, he was discharged to immediately reenlist.  His 
DD Form 214 does not show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal.  On 
28 February 1970, he immediately reenlisted for 3 years.

5.  On 20 February 1973, he was released from active duty.  His DD Form 214 does not show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal.

6.  Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal.

7.  There are no orders in his Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) for the award of the Bronze Star Medal.

8.  Review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal any orders awarding him the Bronze Star Medal.

9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Bronze Star Medal is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service.  As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  His DA Form 20 does not indicate he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal.  There are no orders in his MPRJ awarding him the Bronze Star Medal.  A review of ADCARS failed to reveal any orders awarding him the Bronze Star Medal.

2.  Therefore, there is insufficient evidence in this case to add the award of the Bronze Star Medal to his DD Form 214.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ___x____  ____x___  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _   _x______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120018842





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120018842



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140001287

    Original file (20140001287.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, the evidence is sufficient to show the FSM was eligible for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) based on completion of qualifying service from 5 November 1968 to 10 June 1970 ending with the termination of a period of active Federal service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the Army Good Conduct Medal (First Award) for the period of service from 5 November 1968 to 10...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130016740

    Original file (20130016740.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests the Silver Star and the Bronze Star Medal be added to his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) with an effective date of 11 June 1971. The Silver Star is awarded for gallantry in action against the enemy.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002544

    Original file (20140002544.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214 with an effective date of 15 November 1969. There is no evidence in his MPRJ and he has not provided any substantive evidence that shows he was recommended for or awarded the Bronze Star Medal with "V" device. Therefore, without sustantative evidence showing he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with "V" device this award should not be added to his DD Form 214.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002847

    Original file (20140002847.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the: * National Defense Service Medal * Combat Infantryman Badge * Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) * Bronze Star Medal with "V" device * Vietnam Service Medal with 2 bronze service stars 8. The applicant's records do not show indiscipline or lost time, he received conduct and efficiency ratings of "excellent" throughout his military service, and he was promoted to sergeant in less than 2 years. As a result, the Board recommends...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130020045

    Original file (20130020045.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Therefore, in the absence of evidence showing additional awards of the Bronze Star Medal, the entry for the Bronze Star Medal on his DD Form 214 is correct. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending his DD Form 214 with an effective date of 27 December 1971 as follows: a. Delete the: * Air Medal W/DVC 60 * Vietnam Service Medal b. Add the: * Air Medal * Valorous Unit Award * Vietnam Service Medal with...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110011826

    Original file (20110011826.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He also provides a copy of Headquarters, 23rd Infantry Division, General Orders Number 09791, dated 1 September 1971, awarding him the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious service from 1 September 1970 to 31 July 1971. ADCARS contains Headquarters, 23rd Infantry Division, General Orders Number 09791, dated 1 September 1971, awarding the applicant the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious service from 1 September 1970 to 31 July 1971. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070010233C080407

    Original file (20070010233C080407.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's MPRJ is void of any orders or other documents that indicate he was ever recommended for or awarded the BSM while serving on active duty. The applicant's record is void of any orders, documents, or an award recommendation that shows he was ever recommended for the BSM while serving on active duty. The evidence of record also shows that based on his RVN service and campaign participation, the applicant is entitled to the RVN Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and 1...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110012359

    Original file (20110012359.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of his DA Form 20 does not show award of the Purple Heart, the Army Good Conduct Medal, or the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. Therefore, the preponderance of evidence shows the applicant is entitled to the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service from 27 December 1968 to 10 December 1970 ending with termination of a period of Federal military service. As a result, the Board recommends...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120020830

    Original file (20120020830.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provided a Bronze Star Medal Citation indicating he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal for outstanding meritorious service in connection with military operations against a hostile force in the Republic of Vietnam during the period 10 March 1971 to 9 March 1972. ADCARS did reveal orders awarding him the Army Commendation Medal for meritorious service in the Republic of Vietnam during the same period as shown on the Bronze Star Medal Certificate and Citation the applicant...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110008280

    Original file (20110008280.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His military service records do not contain any orders awarding him the AM. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, stated the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) was awarded to individuals who completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the AGCM (1st Award) for the period 9 April 1969 through 19 November 1970; b....