Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018321
Original file (20120018321.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	   

		BOARD DATE:	  25 April 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120018321 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show eligibility to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits under the Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) program to his daughter.

2.  The applicant states the details related to transfer of Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits was not specified, clear, or finalized at the time of his retirement and was not adequately explained during his transition.  He would like to transfer his education benefit to his daughter so she can get the education she needs in life.

3.  The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) and DD Form 93(E) (Record of Emergency Data).

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 

has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant served on active duty from 5 October 1989 through 31 May 2007 at which time he was retired by reason of sufficient service for retirement in the rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6.  He completed 20 years and 19 days of creditable active service.

3.  Office of the Under Secretary of Defense Directive-Type Memorandum
09-003, dated 22 June 2009, established the policy and procedures for implementing Title 38, U.S. Code, chapter 33.  Included in the directive is the procedure for transferring educational benefits to eligible family members.  The law states that any member of the Armed Forces (on active duty or Selected Reserve) serving on or after 1 August 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, can transfer their entitlement to their spouse or eligible child(ren).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The law providing for transfer of Post-9/11 educational benefits is very specific.  A Soldier had to be in an active status on 1 August 2009 in order to take advantage of the transfer option.

2.  The applicant retired on 1 June 2007, over 2 years prior to the date registration for the TEB program commenced.  The program was not made retroactive for personnel who retired prior to 1 August 2009.  As such, the applicant does not meet the eligibility requirements for participation in the Post-9/11 GI Bill TEB program.

3.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____x___  ___x____  ___x____  DENY APPLICATION


BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _   _x______   ___
       	   CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120018321



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120018321



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015264

    Original file (20130015264.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides no additional evidence in support of his application. f. A child may use the benefit while the eligible individual remains in the Armed Forces or after separation from active duty after completing the additional service required to transfer the educational assistance under the Post-9/11 GI Bill. Therefore, he is not eligible to transfer his educational benefits under the TEB provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill to his daughter.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013646

    Original file (20120013646.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show he elected to transfer his education benefits to his dependents under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. A Soldier must initially request to transfer benefits on the DOD TEB online database. However, there is no evidence of record and he provided no evidence which shows he attempted to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents other than his daughter (Michelle)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011060

    Original file (20120011060.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests approval of Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) under the Post-9/11 GI Bill to her daughter. The evidence of record shows the applicant retired from active duty on 31 October 2009 which is within 90 days of the implementation of the program. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing she filed her application and the Army approved her request to transfer Post-9/11 GI Bill...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140007288

    Original file (20140007288.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests, in effect, to adjust the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) Obligation End Date (OED) and the Department of the Army TEB Service Obligation to 31 October 2011, his last day on active duty. The applicant was on active duty when he requested TEB. With regard to his daughter's approximately $33,000.00 debt which the VA initiated due to the applicant not fulfilling the TEB OED, the VA permits the veteran to submit a request for relief through the VA...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002186

    Original file (20140002186.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant requests correction of his records to show his education benefits were transferred to his eligible dependent in accordance with the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active service or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110009936

    Original file (20110009936.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Public Law 110-252, section 3319 provides the eligibility requirements necessary to transfer unused education benefits to family members. Notwithstanding the advisory opinion, and in view of the fact that information on transfer application procedures was not fully available at the time he began his transition, it would serve the interest of equity and fairness to correct his record to reflect he applied to transfer his education benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability Program...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015576

    Original file (20130015576.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his application the applicant provides a copy of his milConnect TEB printout that shows his request to transfer 24 months of educational benefits to his daughter (Vashti), with a Begin Date of 20 August 2009 and End Date of 1 August 2011, was approved on 20 August 2009. Therefore, as an exception to policy, it would be appropriate in this case to correct the applicant's military records to show he elected to transfer a portion of his benefits to his daughter (Faith) as an...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130009663

    Original file (20130009663.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. A Soldier must meet several criteria to qualify to transfer benefits to an eligible dependent. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000824

    Original file (20140000824 .txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 August 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140000824 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. However, the evidence of record shows that, for whatever reason, he only transferred the benefits to his wife; he did not transfer any educational benefits in the TEB online database to either of his daughters. He has not provided sufficient evidence to show he added all of his eligible dependent's into the TEB database prior to or at the time of retirement and allocated...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140000824

    Original file (20140000824.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 August 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20140000824 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. However, the evidence of record shows that, for whatever reason, he only transferred the benefits to his wife; he did not transfer any educational benefits in the TEB online database to either of his daughters. He has not provided sufficient evidence to show he added all of his eligible dependent's into the TEB database prior to or at the time of retirement and allocated...