Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120016619
Original file (20120016619.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  30 May 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120016619 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests the record of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM), be corrected to show she is the eligible beneficiary for a Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) annuity based on the FSM's death.  

2.  The applicant states she was given misleading information from the Alabama Army National Guard (ALARNG) retired activities branch and therefore the statute of limitations should be lifted.  

3.  The applicant provides the documents identified in item 9 (In support of this application, I submit as evidence the following attached documents) of her application in support of her request.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.
2.  The record shows that after serving in the Regular Army and U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), the applicant entered the ALARNG on 19 April 1975.  He continuously served through reenlistments until being discharged from the ALARNG and transferred to the Retired Reserve, in the grade of staff sergeant/E-6, on 21 July 1997.  

3.  The record contains a Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (Twenty Year Letter), issued by the State Military Department, Office of The Adjutant General, Montgomery, Alabama on 23 November 1992.  The record also contains a DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Certificate), dated 28 December 1992, which the FSM completed in conjunction with receipt of his Twenty Year Letter.  In this certificate, the FSM indicated he was not married and he elected full children only coverage under Option C (immediate coverage).   

4.  The applicant provides a marriage license record that indicates she and the FSM were married on 28 February 1992 at Montgomery, Alabama.  She also provides a DD Form 1883, dated 17 January 1996, in which the FSM indicated he was married to the applicant on 10 September 1993, and that he was electing full spouse and children coverage under Option C.  

5.  Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for Reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60.  Three options are available:  (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose 
at age 60 whether to start RCSBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60.  

6.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1448(a)(5) provides that a person who is not
married and has no dependent child upon becoming eligible to participate in
the SBP but who later marries or acquires a dependent child may elect to
participate in the SBP.  Such an election must be written, signed by the
person making the election, and received by the Secretary concerned within
one year after the date on which that person marries or acquires that
dependent child.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s request to correct the FSM’s record to show she is eligible for a SBP annuity based on his death has been carefully considered.  However, the law in effect at the time required an RCSBP election be made within 90 days of receipt of the 20 Year Letter, and that a member who married subsequent to being eligible to participate in the RCSBP had to submit a written request for spouse coverage within one year of the marriage.  

2.  In this case, upon receipt of his 20 Year Letter, the FSM completed a 
DD Form 1883 on 28 December 1992, in which he indicated he was not married and elected children only coverage.  The applicant provides a marriage license record indicating she and the FSM were married on 28 February 1992, well before the FSM became eligible to participate in the RCSBP.  She also provides a DD Form 1883, dated 17 January 1996, four years after their marriage, in which the FSM indicated they were married on 28 February 1993, and elected full spouse and children coverage under Option C.  

3.  Given the inconsistencies in the forms completed by the FSM and applicant, equity relief would not be appropriate in this case.  

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the requested relief.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X____  ____X_ _  ___X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X____________
                 CHAIRPERSON

I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. 
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120016619



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120016619



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015297

    Original file (20130015297.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A letter, dated 20 October 2000, wherein the ALARNG State Military Department provided her a DD Form 1998 (Application for Annuity) to complete and file for compensation. The applicant stated she submitted a request for an SBP annuity as early as 2000 and the HRC letter, dated 14 November 2000, notified her of the receipt of her claim. That letter does not indicate she was advised of entitlement to an RCSBP or SBP annuity starting at age 60.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070018429

    Original file (20070018429.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, that the records of her deceased husband, a former service member (FSM) be corrected to show that he elected to change his Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage from "None" to "Spouse only" coverage upon marriage. The applicant states, in effect, that the FSM completed the DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) in 1995 when he was unmarried, electing no coverage since he was single at the time. When the FSM received his 20-Year Letter on...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140013131

    Original file (20140013131.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 2 June 2003, the FSM was issued a Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 (20-Year Letter). Public Law 106-398, 30 October 2000, required that upon receipt of that letter, a qualified RC member, who was married, would automatically be enrolled in the RCSBP under option C, spouse and child(ren) coverage based on full retired pay, unless different coverage was selected within 90 days of receipt of that letter. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050013725C070206

    Original file (20050013725C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Edward E. Montgomery | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Three options are available: (A) elect to decline enrollment and choose at age 60 whether to start SBP participation; (B) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity if they die before age 60 but delay payment of it until the date of the member’s 60th birthday; (C) elect that a beneficiary receive an annuity immediately upon their death if before age 60. ...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001874

    Original file (20150001874.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * it was the intent of her husband that she receive an annuity based on his election on the DD Form 1883 (SBP Election Certificate) he completed in November 1989 * the FSM died on 25 May 2005 and she was under the impression that she would need to wait until she was 65, just like Medicare and social security, to apply for the SBP * she did not know nor was she informed by the Alabama Army National Guard (ALARNG) that she should have applied for the annuity at the time...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017757

    Original file (20090017757.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant submits a DD Form 1883 completed by the FSM dated 13 January 1992: * showing his status as married * listing the applicant's name as his spouse * indicating he had two dependent children * electing SBP coverage for spouse and children * electing Option C based on full amount of retired pay 11. The applicant also submits a DD Form 2656 completed by the FSM on 24 April 2006: * showing his status as married * listing the applicant's name as his spouse * electing SBP coverage for...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004101899C070208

    Original file (2004101899C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since he had elected children only coverage, he had to elect either option B or option C. If he were married, he and his spouse had to sign the reverse of the DD Form 1883. The available evidence of record shows that the FSM was not married to the applicant in May 1989; therefore, he could not have elected spouse coverage at that time. The available evidence of record shows that the FSM and the applicant married in October 1989; therefore, by the time the March 1992 letter was sent out...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100022618

    Original file (20100022618.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She and the FSM were married in 1988 and he elected spouse coverage for her within the first year of their marriage. The applicant provides: * the FSM's divorce degree * the FSM's DD Form 1883 (Survivor Benefit Plan Election Certificate) * the applicant and the FSM's marriage license * the FSM's Joint Uniform Military Pay System (JUMPS)-Army Retired/Annuitant Pay Statement effective February 1991 * a letter from DFAS to the FSM, dated 1 February 1991 * the FSM's Retiree Account Statement...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040000391C070208

    Original file (20040000391C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Since it thus appears the applicant did not give her consent to the FSM's child only coverage RCSBP election, by law the FSM's RCSBP election defaulted to spouse coverage. The FSM did not indicate on the DD Form 1883 which option he desired. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing that the FSM elected to participate in the RCSBP for child only coverage, full base amount, option C but that the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080006415

    Original file (20080006415.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Notification of Eligibility for Retired Pay at Age 60 Memorandum, dated 17 November 1988. c. DD Form 1883, dated 7 January 1989. d. Certificate of Marriage, dated 2 August 2000. e. Miscellaneous letters and Designation of Beneficiary Forms from the New York State Police and Fire Retirement System. This letter notified the FSM that he had completed the required years of service and would be eligible for retired pay upon application at age 60. Even if the FSM had been able to enroll the...