IN THE CASE OF:
BOARD DATE: 5 February 2013
DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120016078
THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:
1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).
2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant requests change of his discharge to a medical retirement.
2. The applicant states he was misdiagnosed during the medical evaluation board (MEB) process. He claims he was later found to suffer from Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and granted a 50% disability rating by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). He states the 50% disability rating assigned by the VA would have resulted in his medical retirement had it been assigned during his Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) processing.
3. The applicant provides a Congressional Inquiry packet and refers to a VA claim in support of his request. He did not provide the VA rating decision or VA medical treatment records.
CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 16 February 2006. He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty 15U (CH-47 Helicopter Repairer). He was promoted to the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 on
1 October 2009 and this is the highest rank he attained while serving on active duty.
2. On 10 September 2010, an MEB convened to consider the applicant's case and evaluated the following two diagnosed conditions that resulted in the findings indicated:
a. right illioinguinal/ iliohypogastric neuropath, status post-right inguinal herniorrhaphy, which it found was medically unacceptable; and
b. adjustment disorder with anxiety and depressed mood, which it determined was medically acceptable.
3. The MEB referred the applicant's case to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). The medical treatment records supporting the MEB findings show the applicant was consistently diagnosed and treated for an adjustment disorder related to marital problems beginning in April 2009. The medical treatment records provide no record of the applicant complaining of any of the 3 conditions required to establish a diagnosis of PTSD.
4. On 13 October 2010, the applicant agreed with the findings and recommendations of the MEB. He provided a statement related to his adjustment disorder wherein he stated he believed he was diagnosed prior to surgery. He did not question the validity of the diagnosis.
5. On 3 November 2010, a PEB evaluated the applicant's case. The PEB found the applicant's "inguinal neuropathy following right inguinal herniorrhaphy" condition unfitting and assigned a 10% disability rating. The PEB noted the applicant's adjustment disorder was a condition not constituting a physical disability. The PEB recommended the applicant's separation from service with severance pay.
6. On 8 November 2010, the applicant concurred with the PEB's findings and recommendation and waived his right to a formal hearing. On 10 November 2010, the PEB proceedings were approved by the proper authority.
7. On 8 February 2011, the applicant was honorably discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-40 (Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement, or Separation), chapter 4, by reason of disability, severance pay, combat-related. The DD Form 214 he was issued at the time shows he completed a total of 4 years, 11 months, and 23 days of creditable active service.
8. Army Regulation 635-40 establishes the Army PDES and sets forth policies, responsibilities, and procedures that apply in determining whether a Soldier is unfit because of physical disability to reasonably perform the duties of his/her office, grade, rank, or rating. It stipulates that in each case, it is necessary to compare the nature and degree of physical disability present with the
requirements of the duties the Soldier reasonably may be expected to perform because of his or her office, grade, rank, or rating.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:
1. The applicant's request for correction of his disability rating and change of his discharge to a medical retirement has been carefully considered. However, there is insufficient evidence to support this claim.
2. The applicant's separation from active duty complied with applicable laws and policies. The evidence of record confirms the applicant was properly processed through the PDES and provided a disability rating based on the unfitting condition identified by the PEB. All requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.
3. The evidence of record and independent evidence provided by the applicant fail to show he was suffering from PTSD at the time of his separation processing. The medical treatment records included in his MEB packet confirm he was consistently diagnosed and treated for an adjustment disorder beginning in April 2009 that resulted from marital problems. The medical treatment records fail to show the applicant ever complained of any of the DSM required criteria required to establish a PTSD diagnosis. As a result, there is no medical evidence that would call into question the validity of the PEB findings and recommendations.
4. Further, this case does not meet any of the screening criteria established by the Office of The Surgeon General (OTSG) (i.e. changed diagnosis during MEB). There is also no medical evidence showing the applicant was suffering from a disabling PTSD condition at the time of his PDES processing.
5. In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support granting the applicant's requested relief.
BOARD VOTE:
________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF
________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING
____X___ ____X___ ___X__ _ DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:
The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.
_______ _ X ______ ___
CHAIRPERSON
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120016078
3
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120016078
2
ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
1
ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004884
The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his records to show the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), dated 24 September 2009: * Granted him a higher disability rating under the Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) for his medical condition * rated him for other medical conditions that were not diagnosed until after he was discharged from the Army 2. A VA Rating Decision, dated 19 May 2011, wherein it shows, effective 10 October 2010, the VA granted...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080012089
The applicant states, in effect, she had a hernia operation while serving in Kuwait which resulted in residual pain. The applicant provides: a. If the MEBD determines the Soldier does not meet retention standards, the board will recommend referral of the Soldier to a PEB.
AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-02106
Right Inguinal Pain Condition .The treatment record reflected that the CI had a right-sided inguinal hernia repair done in 2005 with a return of painful symptoms in 2006. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110006400
It also determined the applicant was evaluated by a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) that recommended that he be referred to a PEB and he concurred with the findings and recommendations of the MEB. He concludes that based on the applicant being granted a 100% disability rating by the DVA and SSA effective the date of his separation from military service, the Army, or PEB, got it wrong in granting only a 40% disability rating. There is no evidence of record or independent evidence submitted...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100030407
The evidence of record confirms the applicant was properly processed through the Army's PDES. The evidence of record is void of any medical treatment records indicating the applicant was diagnosed with PTSD during his processing through the PDES or prior to his discharge. The rating decision shows the applicant is properly being treated and compensated for his service-connected PTSD and other conditions by the VA, which is the appropriate agency to provide these services for...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01708
The MEB also identified and forwarded seven other conditions for PEB adjudication one of which was a MH condition of adjustment disorder, meeting retention standards. The Board reviews medical records and other available evidence to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, using VASRD standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation; and, to review those fitness determinations within its scope (as elaborated above) consistent with performance-based criteria in...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002462
(2) Axis II: No diagnosis. e. A review of his military medical records shows there was insufficient evidence to conclude that he met the medical criteria for a PTSD diagnosis and that his PEB should be changed from bipolar II disorder to PTSD. Based on the diagnosis of classical bipolar II disorder and the advisory opinion from OTSG, it appears that there is insufficient evidence to conclude that he met the medical criteria for a PTSD diagnosis that was unfitting during his active military...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130004980
The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation of his mental health condition. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant's records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of his mental health condition during processing through the military disability system. The SRP recommended there be no change of the applicant's disability/permanent disability retirement determination.
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01868
No other conditions were submitted by the MEB.The PEBadjudicatedchronic LLQ pain s/p inguinal hernia repair condition as unfitting, existed prior to service (EPTS) reduced by 0%, and rated 10% with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The CI made no appeals, and was medically separatedwith a 10% disability rating. The examiner diagnosed chronic LLQ pain s/p inguinal hernia repair.The MEB physical exam at the time of the NARSUM demonstrated mild to...
AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 02018
It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The Board noted that the VA initially rated the CI for depression with insomnia and did not change the diagnosis until over 3 years after separation, based on the 10 July 2012 C&P evaluation. BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department...