Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120015371
Original file (20120015371.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  25 June 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120015371 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests remission or cancellation of his terminated Non-prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB) recoupment action.

2.  The applicant states he enlisted in the Army National Guard (ARNG) for the NPSEB in critical skill military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Infantryman) in April 2009.  In July 2011, he voluntarily transferred from MOS 11B to MOS 31B (Military Police) for the purpose of securing an active duty for operational support (ADOS) position in violation of his bonus contract which requires termination of the bonus with recoupment.  He further states he believes the termination with recoupment of the bonus is unjust because MOS 31B was a critical skill at the time.  Also, he was unemployed and used the ADOS position for career progression.

3.  The applicant provides:

* an Enlistment Agreement (Guard Annex) with National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 600-7-1-R-E (Annex E (NPSEB Addendum)) to DD Form 4 (Enlistment or Reenlistment Agreement)
* Missouri ARNG (MOARNG) Orders 294-059

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  On 1 April 2009, the applicant enlisted in the MOARNG for a period of 6 years.  He completed his training as an infantryman and continued to serve in the MOARNG.

2.  In connection with the applicant's enlistment, he and his recruiter signed an NGB Form 600-7-1-R-E.

	a.  Section II (Eligibility), paragraph 7, shows the entry:  "I am enlisting into a Critical UIC [Unit Identification Code]/Skill 11B (per SRIP [Selected Reserve Incentive Program] policy) to serve no less than 6 years in a paid drill status for $10,000," followed by his initials.

	b.  Section IV (Payments), paragraph 1, shows the entry:  "I will receive a total bonus of $10,000.00 for the enlistment bonus options in Section II," followed by his initials.

	c.  Section IV, paragraph 7, shows the entry:  "I understand my bonus will be paid in three installments.  First 50% will be processed upon completion of IADT [initial active duty for training] and verification of MOS qualification for which I enlisted or upon sufficient training to be deployable.  The second 20% installment will be processed on the third-year anniversary, and final 30% installment will be processed on the sixth-year anniversary of the Soldier's date of enlistment," followed by his initials.

	d.  Section V (Termination), paragraph 2d, shows the applicant acknowledged his bonus eligibility would be terminated with recoupment for voluntarily transferring out of the critical UIC or critical skill for which the bonus was approved.

	e.  Section VI (Recoupment) shows the amount he was entitled to would be calculated by multiplying the number of full months served satisfactorily during the incentive term by the proportionate monthly dollar amount.  Based on this calculation, overpayment would be recouped or he would be reimbursed if he earned more than he had received.

3.  On 2 November 2009, he completed IADT, and he was awarded MOS 11B.

4.  MOARNG Orders 201-118, dated 20 July 2011, transferred the applicant from an infantry unit to an MOS 31B position in a military police detachment effective 11 July 2011.

5.  On 8 August 2011, MOARNG Orders 216-023, dated 4 August 2011, ordered the applicant to Full Time National Guard Duty – Operational Support 
(FTNGD-OS) for the period 8 August 2011-6 August 2012.

6.  There is no evidence as to whether the State Incentive Manager submitted a request for an exception to policy regarding the termination and recoupment of the applicant's bonus.

7.  A staff advisory opinion was obtained from the Budget Branch, Enlisted Accessions Division, Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, dated 2 May 2013, in the processing of this case which recommends denial of the applicant's request.  The opinion states the applicant voluntarily transferred from MOS 11B to MOS 31B on 11 July 2011.  The applicant's NPSEB Addendum clearly states that termination from incentive eligibility with recoupment could occur if the service member voluntarily transferred out of the critical skill for which the bonus was approved.

8.  The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for information and to allow him the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal.  He provided a memorandum for record, dated 21 May 2013, subject:  Exception to Policy.  He states he was selected for a full-time ADOS position with the Homeland Response Force on 11 July 2011.  The position required him to be assigned to a 70th Troop Command position.  Taking this position allowed him to further his career as an ARNG Soldier.  The 70th Troop Command did not have any available MOS 11B positions for him to be assigned to.  He elected to take an MOS 31B position with the 1175th Military Police Company.  Both 31B and 11B were critical MOS's at the time.  He is currently able to support himself and his current financial obligations.  Prior to accepting the position with the 1175th Military Police Company, he had no source of income other than his 
M-day [mobilization] status (an M-Day member is one who performs weekend drill, but is not on full-time duty).  He believes it is inequitable for the ARNG to penalize him for wanting to advance his career as an MOARNG Soldier.  He requests termination of his NPSEB without recoupment.

9.  A staff advisory opinion was obtained from the Chief, Personnel Policy Division, NGB, dated 12 June 2013, in the processing of this case which recommends approval of the applicant's request.  The opinion states that upon coordination with NGB-GSE and its attached email, dated 20 May 2013, "the [applicant] enlisted into the bonus MOS of 11B on 1 April 2009.  Both 11B and 31B were critical skills on this date under SRIP policy 07-06, effective 1 March 2009 through 15 June 2010.  However, on 11 July 2011, the [applicant's] contract was terminated citing an unauthorized change in MOS.  NGB-GSE further states that at the time of the [applicant's] MOS change, 31B was not on the critical skill list."

10.  The advisory official further stated that based on the applicant's statement and information provided by the MOARNG, MOS 31B was a critical skill at the time of his initial enlistment and voluntary transfer.  Although the email from NGB-GSE suggests that MOS 31B was not on the critical skill list at the time of the MOS transfer, the fact that the Soldier was not properly informed is no fault of his and he should not be penalized.  The State concurred with this recommendation.

11.  The advisory opinion was forwarded to the applicant for information and to allow him the opportunity to submit comments or a rebuttal.  He did not submit a response.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant enlisted for a $10,000.00 NPSEB in critical skill MOS 11B for a period of 6 years.  He voluntarily transferred to MOS 31B.  Therefore, he did not fulfill his contractual agreement.

2.  The evidence shows he served in his bonus MOS 11B for more than 2 years prior to accepting an ADOS position.  He transferred to MOS 31B – which appears was not a critical skill MOS at the time of his MOS transfer – to serve in a full-time position that he apparently could not serve in under his original MOS of 11B.  Accordingly, based on his contract his bonus should have been terminated at the time of his voluntary transfer with recoupment for any unserved portion already paid.

3.  Notwithstanding the NGB advisory opinion supporting relief, as stated by the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff, G-1, the applicant's NPSEB Addendum clearly states that termination from incentive eligibility with recoupment could occur if the service member voluntarily transferred out of the critical skill for which the bonus was approved.  As such, there is no error.  Further, there is no compelling evidence of inequity and injustice since the applicant would only be required to pay back a pro-rated share of what he had received.

4.  In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient basis for granting the applicant's request.



BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X__  __X______  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      ___________X______________
                 CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120015371



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120015371



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130015916

    Original file (20130015916.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 February 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130015916 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his record to show approval of a waiver for recoupment of a portion of his Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB). The advisory opinion recommends disapproval of the applicant's request based on section V of the NPSEB Addendum which provides that bonus eligibility would be terminated with recoupment if he voluntarily...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150006476

    Original file (20150006476.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Due to her injuries and being at the hospital the morning of her unit’s departure for its training weekend, she was unable to attend this weekend drill. The applicant offers evidence, both in the form of her self-authored statement in her ETP, medical documents, and two MFRs (respectively from the NCOIC of the rear detachment and the Readiness NCO for the unit wherein nine identified absences took place). Based on her medical documentation, it is apparent that her unit commander could have...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130012810

    Original file (20130012810.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states: * she accrued several unexcused absences which led to her bonus being terminated with recoupment * her chain of command stated she accrued 9 unexcused absences within a one-year period * one of the unexcused absences occurred during a busy graduation week at the St. Louis Police Academy and she was unable to reschedule the drill * she was told she would be excused from absence...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120021048

    Original file (20120021048.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her record to show a waiver was granted for the recoupment of her non-prior service enlistment bonus (NPSEB). The applicant contends that her military record should be corrected to show the recoupment of her NPSEB was waived because she had to move with her husband to Arizona. The available evidence clearly shows the applicant enlisted in the NJARNG for training in a critical skill MOS.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001414

    Original file (20150001414.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His record contains an NGB 22-5 (Addendum to DD Form 4 - Approval and Acceptance by Service Representative for Interstate Transfer in the ARNG), dated 8 April 2008, wherein the applicant acknowledged having voluntarily transferred to the IDARNG with continued membership in the ARNG for the period remaining on his current enlistment, with ETS of 12 October 2012. Oregon Military Department, Joint Force Headquarters, Oregon National Guard, Orders 121-055, dated 30 April 2008, show the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013478

    Original file (20130013478.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In connection with his enlistment, he completed Annex E (NPSEB Addendum – ARNG) to DD Form 4 (Enlistment/Reenlistment Document – Armed Forces of the United States) wherein he acknowledged he understood: * upon his enlistment in the ARNG, he would be eligible for an enlistment bonus as indicated in the Selected Reserve Incentive Program (SRIP) * he was enlisting in a critical skill MOS under the 6x2 or 8x0 enlistment option and he would receive a non-prior service critical skill bonus of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018974

    Original file (20140018974.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 March 2009, the applicant enlisted in the PAARNG for training in MOS 15U and assignment to Company B, 628th Support Battalion. He agreed to quick-ship on 27 March 2009, attend off-peak AIT, train in MOS 15U, and serve with the 628th Support Battalion. He moved to another unit (HHC, 2nd Battalion, 112th Infantry) on 12 July 2010 and initially served/was promoted in MOS 11B and then he attended training for and was awarded MOS 68W.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130013618

    Original file (20130013618.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her records by adding a Non-Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (NPSEB) Addendum to her enlistment contract and showing an exception to policy (ETP) was approved allowing her to receive an NPSEB. The Guard Annex does not indicate she was enlisting for an NPSEB. In the absence of evidence showing she completed an NPSEB Addendum or served continuously in the MOS for which she enlisted, NGB correctly denied the request for an ETP to allow her to receive the NPSEB.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140017978

    Original file (20140017978.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His Annex E shows he acknowledged: * he was enlisting for MOS 11B which had been identified as eligible for a $20,000.00 critical MOS and for unit identification code (UIC) WQNMB0, Troop B, 1st Battalion, 150th Armored Reconnaissance Squadron, paragraph number 102, line number 004 * he would receive 50 percent of the bonus, less taxes, upon completion of initial active duty for training and he was awarded the MOS for which he enlisted * he would receive the final bonus payment, less taxes,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140018606

    Original file (20140018606.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, termination of recoupment of his non-prior service enlistment bonus (NPSEB) and payment of the second half of his NPSEB. He completed Annex E to DD Form 4 (NPSEB Addendum – Army National Guard of the United States) wherein he indicated: * he was non-prior service * he enlisted in the 863rd Military Police (MP) Company * training in the critical skill/MOS of 25U * NPSEB of $20,000 less taxes (50/50 payment) * first payment (50 percent) paid upon completion...