Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120015127
Original file (20120015127.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:  20 November 2012

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120015127 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests that the documents related to his going absent without leave (AWOL) and being dropped from rolls (DFR) be transferred to the restricted portion of his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR).

2.  He states, as a newly-promoted officer, he feels it would be an injustice for actions that occurred 12 years ago to be a potential discriminator for any future endeavors he may undertake.

3.  The applicant provides his:

* DD Form 458 (Charge Sheet)
* DD Form 553 (Deserter/Absentee Wanted by the Armed Forces)
* DD Form 616 (Report of Return of Absentee)

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:
1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, 
has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant initially enlisted in the Regular Army on 17 August 1999 and after several reenlistments, served until he was discharged on 19 June 2012 after being selected as a warrant officer.  On 20 June 2012, he was appointed as a warrant officer and is currently serving in the rank/pay grade of warrant officer one/W-1 at Fort Sill, OK.  

3.  His record contains and he submitted a:

	a.  DD Form 553, dated 27 July 2001, which shows he was AWOL from 27 June to 27 July 2001.

	b.  DD Form 458, dated 27 July 2001, which shows he was charged with one specification of AWOL on 27 June 2001.  

	c.  DD Form 616, dated 23 September 2001, which shows he surrendered to military authorities and was returned to military control on 23 September 2001 after being DFR on 27 July 2001.

4.  The complete facts and circumstances of his period of AWOL and DFR are not available for review.  However, his record contains a DD Form 214 that shows he completed 12 years, 10 months, and 3 days of creditable active service with 0 days of time lost and was promoted to the rank/pay grade of sergeant first class (SFC)/E-7 with a date of rank of 1 June 2010.

5.  The applicant's record also contains numerous awards and decorations which include but are not limited to:  the Bronze Star Medal, two Army Commendation Medals, Gold Recruiter Badge with two Star Sapphires as well as the Iraq Campaign Medal.  His Noncommissioned Officer Evaluation Reports (NCOERs) rendered after his period of AWOL/DFR show he was consistently rated as "Best Qualified" by his rating officials.  Further, it has been 12 years since he went AWOL and was DFRd.  This would appear to substantiate his claim that the intent of the DD Forms 458, 553, and 616 and allied documents have been served.

6.  Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Army Military Human Resource Records Management) prescribes the policies governing the AMHRR, the Military Personnel Records Jacket, the Career Management Individual File, and Army Personnel Qualification Records.  Paragraph 2-4 of this regulation states that 


once a document is placed in the AMHRR it becomes a permanent part of that file and will not be removed from that file or moved to another part of the file unless directed by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records, the Department of the Army Suitability Evaluation Board, Army Appeals Board, Chief of Appeals and Corrections Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, the AMHRR custodian when documents have been improperly filed, Human Resources Command, as an exception, Chief of the Appeals Branch of the Army Reserve Personnel Center and Chief of the Appeals Branch of the National Guard Personnel Center.

7.  Army Regulation 600-37 (Unfavorable Information) sets forth policies and procedures to authorize placement of unfavorable information about Army members in their individual official personnel files and to ensure that unfavorable information that is unsubstantiated, irrelevant, untimely, or incomplete is not filed in their individual official personnel files.  

8. Army Regulation 600-37, paragraph 7-2b states only letters of reprimand, admonition, or censure may be the subject of an appeal for transfer to the restricted section of the AMHRR.  Normally, such appeals will be considered only from Soldiers in grades E-6 and above, officers, and warrant officers.  Such documents may be appealed on the basis of proof that their intended purpose has been served and that their transfer would be in the best interest of the Army.  The burden of proof rests with the recipient to provide substantial evidence that these conditions have been met.  Appeals approved under this provision will result in transfer of the document from the performance section to the restricted section of the AMHRR.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's contention that his record should be corrected by transferring the documents related to his going AWOL and being DFRd was carefully considered.

2.  The evidence of record shows the DD Forms 458, 533, 616, and allied documents are properly filed on the performance fiche of the applicant's AMHRR in accordance with applicable regulations.

3.  His advancement through the enlisted ranks to SFC, selection for warrant officer, and the awards he received speak highly of the applicant's performance of duty and outstanding leadership qualities.  His NCOERs rendered after his return to active duty show he was consistently rated as "Best Qualified" by his rating officials.  Further, it has been 12 years since he departed AWOL and was DFRd.  However, the ABCMR should neither authorize transfer of DD Forms 458, 533, 616, and allied documents from the performance to the restricted portion of his AMHRR as they are a history of his military service.  

4.  The governing regulation does authorize the transfer of certain documents from the performance to the restricted section of the AMHRR when it can be determined that the document has served its intended purpose; however, the Army has an interest in maintaining the integrity of its records.  The data and information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created.  There appears to be no compelling reason to compromise the integrity of the Army’s records by transferring the DD Forms 458, 533, 616, and allied documents from the performance to the restricted portion of his AMHRR.

BOARD VOTE:
________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

____X___  ____X___  ___X__ _  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.



      _______ _  X ______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120015127





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120015127



4


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130005422

    Original file (20130005422.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests the following documents be removed from his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR), formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), or transferred to the restricted section of his AMHRR: a. the file titled "Documents Relating to AWOL (absent without leave) and DFR (dropped from rolls) Status of a Member" in the performance section of his AMHRR; and b. DD Form 553 (Deserter/Absentee Wanted by the Armed Forces), DD Form 616 (Report of Return of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110016692

    Original file (20110016692.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of all documents from his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) relating to an erroneous period of service reported as absent without leave (AWOL)/dropped from the rolls (DFR). Table 2-1 shows for: * DD Form 553 - file in the performance section; file allied documents in the restricted section; refer to filing instructions for the DA Form 4187 * DD Form 616 - file in the performance section; file allied documents in the restricted section; refer to filing...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150005660

    Original file (20150005660.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests: * the removal of all documents related to his absence without leave (AWOL) from his official military personnel file (OMPF) * the Board reverse the decision of the Department of the Army Suitability Evaluation Board (DASEB) to transfer such documents to the restricted folder of his OMPF, retroactive vice not retroactive * a personal hearing 2. Because they are correctly filed, there is no need to transfer those documents to another folder. _______ _ _x______...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100012820

    Original file (20100012820.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). The applicant states he provided the following documents in support of his application: * DA Form 4187 dated 4 March 2002 (not provided) * DA Form 4187 dated 28 March 2002 (not provided) * DD Form 553 dated 30 April 2002 * DD Form 616 dated 17 March 2003 * DA Form 4187 dated 18 March 2003 CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. In this case, the documents in question documenting time lost on the part of the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2005 | 20050017494

    Original file (20050017494.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides the following documents in support of his application: Self-Authored Statement; DD Form 616 and related documents; Personnel Action (DA Forms 4187) AWOL and DFR; CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant’s request that the DD Form 616 and all allied documents on file in his OMPF be removed, and that his corrected record be presented to a STAB for promotion reconsideration was carefully considered. The DD Form 616 and allied documents in question make clear the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150009132

    Original file (20150009132.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests removal of all documents pertaining to an erroneous dropped from the rolls (DFR) status from her official military personnel file (OMPF). The applicant states her unit at advanced individual training (AIT), D Company, 1/222 Aviation Regiment, Fort Eustis, VA, failed to notify her gaining unit, the Replacement Company, 101st Soldier Support Battalion (SSB) at Fort Campbell KY of the requirement to extend her assignment for training in 2002. As a result, the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009895

    Original file (20090009895.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Table 2-1 (Composition of the OMPF) of this Army regulation states that the DD Forms 553 and 616 are filed on the performance section of the OMPF and that the DA Form 4187 that shows time lost to be made good to...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000723

    Original file (20090000723.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    A DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action), dated 5 August 2001 [filed in the service portion of his OMPF] indicates that he had been AWOL for more than 30 days. The DD Form 553 that should be filed in the performance portion of the applicant's record is presently filed in the service and restricted portions. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by filing the subject DD Forms 553 and 616 only in the performance portion of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120018042

    Original file (20120018042.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The report stated the applicant had been AWOL since 1500 on 12 December 2008. He stated he really didn't want to be in the Army any more. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120018042 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120018042 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150001169

    Original file (20150001169.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests reconsideration of his earlier request for an upgrade of his discharge under other than honorable conditions and removal of the Record of Proceedings under Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) from his military records. On 4 December 2014 after carefully considering the evidence of record and the evidence presented by the applicant, the ABCMR denied his request for an upgrade of his discharge under other than honorable conditions and removal of...