Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013251
Original file (20120013251.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  31 January 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120013251 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that a bonus control number (BCN) be added to his Reenlistment/Extension Bonus (REB) Addendum thereby authorizing him a $5,000.00 REB. 

2.  He states he was informed by the National Guard Bureau (NGB) that the reason for termination of his bonus contract was due to his BCN not being requested or approved until 4 days after he signed the REB Addendum.  

3.  The applicant provides the following:

* DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension or Enlistment or Reenlistment), dated 10 June 2010
* NGB Form 600-7-3-R-E (Annex R to DD Form 4 or DA Form 4836 REB Addendum), dated 11 June 2010
* Memorandum, subject:  Exception to Policy Enlistment Bonus, dated 
31 August 2011
* Two DA Forms 2823 (Sworn Statement), dated 1 September 2011 and 
6 November 2011
* DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty)
* Orders 189-0174, dated 8 July 2010
* Congressional Correspondence, dated 16 April 2012

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant's military record shows he enlisted in the Tennessee Army National Guard (TNARNG) on 26 January 1991.  On 5 December 2009, he was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom.  On 10 June 2010, he executed an extension of his enlistment in the TNARNG for a period of 
6 years.

2.  The NGB Form 600-7-3-R-E shows:

	a.  Section III (Bonus Amount and Payments), paragraph 1b, states, "I will receive a total bonus payment of $5,000.00 for a 6-year reenlistment/extension in the NGB approved Critical UIC (Unit Identification Code) of…."

	b.  Section III, paragraph 3, states, "I understand that I will not receive a payment if I do not meet all requirements at the time my reenlistment/extension takes effect.  My reenlistment/extension will be verified by the State Incentive Manager prior to any payment being processed."

	c.  Section VII reflects the applicant acknowledged and understood the contents thereof.

	d.  Section VIII (Authentication) shows the applicant and an enlisting official signed and dated the contract on 11 June 2010.  A BCN is listed on this contract.

3.  In a memorandum, dated 31 August 2011, the TNARNG Readiness Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) requested the applicant be authorized an exception to policy (ETP) for bonus payment and payment for extension.  He said through lack of trained personnel and mission requirement in Iraq, the Soldier's packet was processed incorrectly.  He added the date specified on the bonus addendum was one day beyond the date specified on the DA Form 4836.  He offered the applicant was deployed to Iraq when the extension contract in question was prepared and processed.

4.  On 30 January 2012, the applicant's request for an ETP to retain the $5,000.00 REB was denied.  The Deputy G1, ARNG, stated that the applicant extended in the TNARNG on 10 June 2012 for the REB.  However, the 
NGB Form 600-7-3-R-E was not executed until 11 June 2010 and a BCN was not requested or approved until 15 June 2010.  Therefore, the documentation does not support that an incentive was in conjunction with the extension agreement. 



5.  During the processing of this case, on 24 August 2012, an advisory opinion was obtained from the NGB, Incentives and Budget Branch, Enlisted Accessions Division.  The NGB recommended approval of his request to retain his ARNG REB.   The representative said:

* The applicant extended his enlistment in the TNARNG on 10 June 2010
* He did not sign his bonus addendum until 11 June 2010
* He received his BCN on 15 June 2010, retroactive to the date of his extension
* The administrative error is the cause for nonpayment of the incentive

6.  The applicant was provided a copy of the advisory opinion for acknowledgement/response.  No response was received. 

7.  National Guard Regulation 600-7 (Selected Reserve Incentive Programs), chapter 3, paragraph 6 provides that reenlistment or extension bonus contracts are not valid without BCNs.  These control numbers are issued from the State Incentive Management Office to the retention NCO and reported to the NGB on a monthly basis.  The State Incentive Manager will verify accession packets as prescribed by State policy for BCNs and the accuracy of reenlistment or extension documents.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The evidence of record shows the applicant completed a DA Form 4836 on 
10 June 2010 executing a 6-year extension of his enlistment in the TNARNG.  On 11 June 2010, he completed and signed an REB Addendum which promised him a $5,000.00 bonus for which he was authorized.  However, a BCN was not issued until 15 June 2010, 4 days after the completion of his REB Addendum. 

2.  The Deputy G1, ARNG denied his request for an ETP citing the documentation does not support that an incentive was in conjunction with the extension agreement.  However, NGB, Incentives and Budget Branch, recommended that relief be granted and verified that the administrative error was the cause for nonpayment of the incentive.

3.  The evidence of record shows the applicant executed a 6-year extension in the TNARNG in good faith and complied with all terms of the contract offered to him.  Due to no fault of his own, the BCN was not issued to him at the time of his extension and this deprived him from receiving his bonus.  Therefore, he should be entitled to receive payment of the bonus.


BOARD VOTE:

____x___  ____x___  ____x___  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and State Army National Guard records of the individual concerned be corrected to show he:

     a.  received a valid BCN upon executing the REB Addendum in the TNARNG in the amount of $5,000.00,

     b.  is eligible for payment of the REB in accordance with the terms of his contract, and

    c.  be paid the REB Bonus out of Army National Guard funds as specified in his extension contract.



      _______ _   __x_____   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.



ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120013251





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120013251



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150006247

    Original file (20150006247.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He provided a memorandum from his TNARNG troop commander, dated 10 January 2015, requesting an ETP for the REB on behalf of the applicant which states: * the applicant extended in the TNARNG on 4 December 2010 and received an REB in the amount of $2,500.00 * he met the criteria for the bonus and received a BCN * the BCN supports that he had met all the criteria to be eligible for the ETP REB * the applicant signed the DA Form 4836 and bonus addendum on 4 December 2010 * he was eligible and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150011350

    Original file (20150011350.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant's military record shows he enlisted in the Florida Army National Guard (FLARNG) on 28 December 2004. He further stated the State Incentive Manager will terminate the applicant's bonus with recoupment for the following reasons: * the applicant's BCN was requested after the date of reenlistment/extension * his bonus options were not initialed 6. However, his initials are not contained in Section III, paragraph 2, verifying the bonus option and the BCN was requested after the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130019036

    Original file (20130019036.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    No addendum was generated in either systems, but there is a control number for the National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 600-7-3-R-E (Bonus Addendum) which is the only document missing for the processing of his bonus. His military records located in the integrated Personnel Electronic Records Management System (iPERMS) contain a copy of an Annex E (Enlisted Bonus Addendum) he executed on 19 October 2006 for an enlistment bonus. There is no evidence of record and he provided insufficient...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130021368

    Original file (20130021368.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 14 January 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130021368 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. In conjunction with his 6-year extension in the ARNG, he and his enlisting official signed an NGB Form 600-7-3-R-E on 30 March 2011, for an REB in the amount of $5,000.00. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army and state ARNG records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing he and the appropriate officials timely signed a...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130022263

    Original file (20130022263.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states: * On 16 October 2011, he reenlisted for a term of 3 years * The DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment) was signed on 16 October 2011 and the terms of the contract included a $3,000.00 bonus * The promised bonus was denied for various reasons that are of no fault of his own * He was told his expiration term of service date was not correct in "SIDPERS and GIMS," and that the unit executed an extension without requesting a bonus control number (BCN)...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002265

    Original file (20150002265.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The available records do not contain a reenlistment bonus addendum. c. It wasn't until after he had full access and little knowledge in GIMS that he found out the applicant was denied a bonus due to not requesting a BCN. d. The applicant was denied the bonus due to an administrative error and inadequate training he received as the unit administrative NCO.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140003957

    Original file (20140003957.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Since his original ETS date had not passed and his new 6-year contract had not started, his unit used the same DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment) for both the bonus and the SLRP. The evidence of record shows the applicant reenlisted in the SCARNG on 6 November 2006 for an REB and subsequently completed an addendum on 25 May 2007 for the SLRP in the amount of $20,000 prior to his ETS date of 24 June 2007. After receiving four payments and through no fault of the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2015 | 20150002261

    Original file (20150002261.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant provides: * DA Form 4836 (Oath of Extension of Enlistment or Reenlistment) * National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 600-7-3-R-E (REB Bonus Addendum) * two DD Forms 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) * Louisiana Army National Guard (LAARNG) Orders 322-722, dated 18 November 2009 * LAARNG Orders 345-401, dated 11 December 2009 * Camp Shelby Joint Forces Training Center, Camp Shelby, MS, Orders CS-074-0390, dated 15 March 2010 * workflow status document *...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140006005

    Original file (20140006005.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    He stated: * he reenlisted in the PRARNG on 6 May 2012 with a reenlistment bonus * his bonus addendum was missing the representative's signature * he met all requirements for bonus incentive at the time he submitted the reenlistment bonus addendum * his supporting documents were turned in on time * he didn't know if his documentation had any administrative errors and the errors were not made intentionally 6. The official denied the request for an ETP based on the following discrepancies and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110017413

    Original file (20110017413.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    b. Annex R, section VIII (Authentication) of Annex R reflects the applicant acknowledged a BCN (BCN RxxxxxxxxTN) had been verified, approved, and recorded on the incentive addendum by the State Incentive Manager. On 13 October 2010, by memorandum to the State Incentive Manager, the applicant's immediate commander requested the applicant be paid the extension bonus. As a result, the Board recommends that all State Army National Guard records and the Department of the Army records of the...