Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120013248
Original file (20120013248.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

		
		BOARD DATE:	  22 January 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120013248 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart (PH).  

2.  The applicant states he should be awarded the PH for injuries he sustained in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN) which resulted in him spending several months in the hospital.  

3.  The applicant provides the documents identified in item 9 (In support of this application, I submit as evidence the following attached documents) in support of his request.  

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  On 16 September 1966, the applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States.  He was trained in and awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 26L (Microwave Radio Repairman) and specialist five (SP5)/E-5 is the highest rank he attained and held on active duty.  

3.  The applicant’s DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows he served in the RVN from 26 June to 31 December 1967.  Item 40 (Wounds) is blank and the PH is not included in the list of awards entered in item 41 (Awards and Decorations).  His record is void of orders or other documents indicating he was awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty.  

4.  The record contains a Standard Form 502 (Clinical Record-Narrative Summary) that indicates the applicant was injured in a truck accident in the RVN on 10 December 1967.  This document does not indicate the accident was the result of or caused by enemy action.  

5.  On 13 September 1968, the applicant was honorably released from active duty, in the rank of SP5/E-5 after completing 1 year, 11 months, and 28 days of active military service.  The DD Form 214 he was issued shows that during his active duty tenure he earned the following awards: 

* National Defense Service Medal
* Vietnam Service Medal 
* Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award)
* Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge (Rifle M-14) Bar

6.  The applicant provides medical documents showing he was hospitalized and treated for injuries received in a truck accident in the RVN on 10 December 1967.  None of these documents indicate the accident was the result of or caused by enemy action. 

7.  A review of The Adjutant General's Office, Casualty Division's Vietnam casualty listing does not show the applicant's name as a casualty.

8.  A review of the Awards and Decorations Computer-Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS), an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973 maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the U.S. Army Human Resources Command, failed to reveal an award of the PH pertaining to the applicant.



9.  Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) contains the Army’s awards policy.  Paragraph 2-8 contains guidance on the PH.  It states in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action; that it required treatment by military medical personnel; and a record of the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record.  

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant’s request for award of the PH has been carefully considered.  However, there is insufficient evidence to support his request.  By regulation, in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action, the wound required treatment by medical personnel, and a record of the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. 

2.  The applicant's record is void of any entries or documents indicating he was ever wounded or injured as a result of enemy action.  Item 40 of his DA Form 20 is blank which indicates he was not wounded in action.  

3.  Further, there is no entry on the Vietnam casualty listing, the official DA list of RVN casualties, pertaining to the applicant.  Absent any evidence corroborating the applicant's claim or documentary evidence that shows the truck accident that resulted in the applicant's injuries was the result of or caused by enemy action, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the PH has not been satisfied in this case.  

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

__X___  ____X____  ___X_____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case 


are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      _______ _  X _______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120013248



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120013248



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090000595

    Original file (20090000595.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). In order to support award of the PH there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action; that the wound required treatment by medical personnel; and a record of this medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record and accidents not . Item 40 of the applicant's DA Form 20 is blank, which indicates he was never wounded in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009703C070205

    Original file (20060009703C070205.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states, in pertinent part, that the PH is awarded to any member who has been wounded or killed in action. However, by regulation in order to support award of the PH there must be evidence confirming that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a result of enemy action. Further, Item 40 of the applicant's DA Form 20 is blank, which indicates he was never wounded in action, and Item 41 does not include the PH in the list of authorized awards.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050007835C070206

    Original file (20050007835C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, that he was never awarded the PH for the shrapnel wound he sustained to his right hand while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). The applicant’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no orders or other documents that indicate he was ever wounded in action, or awarded the PH. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show his entitlement to the Meritorious...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004105171C070208

    Original file (2004105171C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant states, in effect, he was wounded in action while serving in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). He claims that he was awarded the PH, but it was not included in the list of awards on his separation document (DD Form 214). It states, in pertinent part, that the PH is awarded to any member who has been wounded or killed in action.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019983

    Original file (20100019983.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record fails to show the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty. In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust. ___________X____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090017072

    Original file (20090017072.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's military service records were not made available to the Board. It states in order to support award of the PH, there must be evidence that the wound for which the award is being made was received as a direct result of enemy action, that it required treatment by military medical personnel, and a record of the treatment must have been made a matter of official record. In this case, contrary to the entry on the VA Form 21-0781, the medical treatment records confirm his injuries...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110019215

    Original file (20110019215.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). Absent any evidence of record or independent evidence submitted by the applicant that shows he was ever wounded in action, the regulatory burden of proof necessary to support award of the PH has not been satisfied in this case. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. deleting from his DD Form 214 the Vietnam Service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088930C070403

    Original file (2003088930C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant states, in effect, that he is entitled to the PH for an injury he received while serving on active duty in the Republic of Vietnam (RVN). His Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no orders or other documents showing that he was ever wounded or injured in action, or that he was ever recommended for or awarded the PH. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned is entitled to 1 silver...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130017486

    Original file (20130017486.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart (PH). Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) states the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained while in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Although the applicant provided an SF 600 which indicated he sustained a hand injury while serving on active duty in the RVN, this evidence does not conclusively show...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2007 | 20070005928C071029

    Original file (20070005928C071029.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Qawiy A. Sabree | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant's Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ) contains no orders or other documents that indicate the applicant was ever recommended for or awarded the PH by proper authority while serving on active duty. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show his entitlement to...