Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120012559
Original file (20120012559.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

		IN THE CASE OF:	  

		BOARD DATE:	  5 February 2013

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20120012559 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, the entries "SEPARATION PAY - - $9761.40" and "MEMBER IS ENTITLED TO HALF INVOLUNTARY SEPARATION PAY" be removed from item 18 (Remarks) of her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty).  

2.  The applicant states:

* Her Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) orders were rescinded after her discharge and she never received any separation pay nor did she obtain a copy of the rescinded orders
* She called Hawaii to find out what happened and was told due to her pregnancy her orders were rescinded and she was not going to receive the separation pay
* This error on her DD Form 214 is preventing full payment of her Department of Veterans Affairs disability payment

3.  The applicant provides:

* W-2 Wage and Tax Statement for 2009
* Leave and Earnings Statement (LES)
* DD Form 214




CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so.  While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.  In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing.

2.  The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 21 February 2002.  She completed her training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 35F (intelligence analyst) and MOS 35P (cryptologic linguist).  She served in Korea and Iraq.  On 1 May 2009, she was honorably discharged for pregnancy or childbirth.  

3.  Item 18 of her DD Form 214 shows, among other entries, the following entries:

* SEPARATION PAY- - $9761.40
* MEMBER IS ENTITLED TO HALF INVOLUNTARY SEPARATION PAY

4.  Her LES covering the period 1-31 May 2009 does not show she received separation pay in the amount of $9761.40.

5.  The Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) confirmed she did not receive separation pay.

6.  The Department of Defense Financial Management Regulation shows to be eligible for separation pay, a Soldier must have:

* completed at least 6 years but fewer than 20 years of active service
* received a service characterization of honorable or under honorable conditions (general)
* signed a written agreement to serve 3 years in the Ready Reserve
* completed an initial term of enlistment
* been involuntarily separated or denied reenlistment

7.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic policy for the separation of enlisted personnel.  It shows that a pregnancy separation is a voluntary discharge.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's DD Form 214 shows she received separation pay in the amount of $9761.40 and that she is entitled to half involuntary separation pay.

2.  Her contention she never received any separation pay appears to have merit.

3.  In order to be eligible for separation pay a Soldier must have been involuntarily separated and signed a written agreement to serve 3 years in the Ready Reserve.  Evidence shows she was honorably discharged for pregnancy or childbirth.  A pregnancy separation is a voluntary discharge.  

4.  Since DFAS records confirm she did not receive separation pay, and her LES covering the period 1-31 May 2009 does not show she received separation pay, it would be equitable to remove the entries "SEPARATION PAY - - $9761.40" and "MEMBER IS ENTITLED TO HALF INVOLUNTARY SEPARATION PAY" from item 18 of her DD Form 214. 

BOARD VOTE:

____X____  ___X_____  ___X_____  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief.  As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by deleting the entries "SEPARATION PAY - - $9761.40" and "MEMBER IS 


ENTITLED TO HALF INVOLUNTARY SEPARATION PAY" from item 18 of her DD Form 214. 



      _______ _   _X______   ___
               CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.


ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120012559





3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20120012559



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090015119

    Original file (20090015119.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 6 January 2009, she requested separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 8-1, by reason of pregnancy with a desired separation date of 1 April 2009. She may request a specific separation date; however, the separation authority and her military physician will determine the separation date. With respect to medical disability, the evidence of record shows she suffered some illnesses during her military service and was seen by medical personnel.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090004068

    Original file (20090004068.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 August 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090004068 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant's request for separation based on pregnancy was not initiated until 17 October 2007, 5 full weeks after her son's birth. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. showing on her DD Form 214 her narrative reason for her separation as dependency; b. showing the authority for her...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110023162

    Original file (20110023162.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests payment of her enlistment bonus. On 12 January 2009, prior to her release from active duty, she submitted a DA Form 5691-R wherein she indicated she was enlisting for the USAR for assignment into the 841st Engineer Battalion, in MOS 92Y, vacancy control number "4XXXXX9." She also completed a DA Form 5261-5-R (USAR Prior Service Enlistment Bonus (PSEB) Addendum) wherein she indicated she was enlisting/reenlisting for 3 years with a bonus amount of $7,500.00 in...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120009950

    Original file (20120009950.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests change of her reentry eligibility (RE) code on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Service) from a 3 to a 1. She voluntarily requested separation from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 8, for pregnancy. Army regulations state that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes based on their...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140004803

    Original file (20140004803.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her: * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 12 May 2008 to show she completed her first term of service * discharge orders from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR), dated 23 November 2011, to show she was medically retired vice medically disqualified * records to show she was separated/discharged/retired in the rank/grade of sergeant (SGT)/E-5 vice specialist (SPC)/E-4 2. The applicant provides: * her DD Form...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090009141

    Original file (20090009141.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 23 July 2008, the applicant requested separation under the provisions of paragraph 8-1 of Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of pregnancy. The "MDF" SPD code is the correct code for Soldiers separating (voluntary) under chapter 8 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of pregnancy or childbirth and the SPD "MDB" is the correct code for Soldier's separating (voluntary) under chapter 6 of Army Regulation 635-200 by reason of hardship. The evidence of record shows that the applicant became...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00398-02

    Original file (00398-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To : Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy filed an application with this Board requesting that her record be corrected to show that she was separated by reason of hardship vice pregnancy or childbirth. e. The Board is aware that Petitioner is not eligible for the MGIB because she did not complete 30 months of active duty, and there is no provision in the law...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01045-02

    Original file (01045-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an 1. enlisted member of the Naval Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that the reason for her discharge from the Navy be changed to hardship so that she will be eligible to receive Montgomery G.I. discharge, it appears that had she been properly advised and remained on active duty until the birth of her child, on 5 June 1994, she would be...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100019960

    Original file (20100019960.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests change of her reentry (RE) code on her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Service) from a "3" to a "1." She voluntarily requested separation from active duty under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations - Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 8, for pregnancy. Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the service at the time and are required to process requests...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100011805

    Original file (20100011805.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    She states she served as an active duty Soldier for 1 year and was honorably discharged with a RE-3C (pregnancy discharge). The applicant was discharged on 10 May 1988 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 8. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing an RE Code of "2" in Item 27 of the applicant's DD Form 214 with an ending date of 10 May 1988 and providing her a corrected separation document.